Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2020 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Single-Sex Mathematics Classrooms

  • Gilah LederEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_139
  • 3 Downloads

Introduction

In recent years it has become popular to replace the word “sex” in single-sex classrooms and single-sex schools with the word “gender.” This substitution warrants some attention for “(p)recision is essential in scientific writing” (American Psychological Association [APA] 2010, p. 71).

The APA (2010) advocates the use of the term “Gender …when referring to women and men as social groups. Sex is biological; use it when the biological distinction is predominant” (p. 71). A similar distinction is made by the World Health Organization (WHO) (2012): “‘Sex’ refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women. ‘Gender’ … to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women.” Given that the division of students into same-sex classrooms is invariably based on biological characteristics, it is appropriate to retain the term sex in the heading of this contribution....

Keywords

Single-sex classroom Single-sex school Single-gender classroom Single-gender school 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Psychological Association (2010) Publication manual of the american psychological association, 6th edn. Author, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown CS (2011) Legal issues surrounding single-sex schools in the U.S.: trends, court cases, and conflicting laws. Sex Roles, Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0001-x
  3. Forgasz HJ, Leder GC (2011) Equity and quality of mathematics education: research and media portrayals. In: Atweh B, Graven M, Secada W, Valero P (eds) Mapping quality and equity in mathematics education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 205–222Google Scholar
  4. Halpern DF, Eliot L, Bigler RS, Fabes RA, Hanish LD, Hyde J, Liben LS, Martin CL (2011) The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science 333:1706–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halpern DF, Eliot L, Bigler RS, Fabes RA, Hanish LD, Hyde J, Liben LS, Martin CL (2012) Response. Science 335:166–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leder GC (1992) Mathematics and gender: changing perspectives. In: Grouws DA (ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 597–622Google Scholar
  7. OECD [The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] (2009) PISA equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2006/equallypreparedforlifehow15-year-oldboysandgirlsperforminschool.htm
  8. Sullivan A, Joshi H, Leonard D (2011) Single-sex schooling and labour market outcomes. Oxford Rev Educ 37(3):311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Thompson T, Ungerleider C (2004) Single sex schooling. Final report. Canadian centre for knowledge mobilisation. Retrieved from http://www.cckm.ca/pdf/SSS%20Final%20Report.pdf
  10. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service (2005) Single-sex versus secondary schooling: a systematic review, Washington, D.C., 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/reports.html
  11. World Health Organization (2012) What do we mean by “sex” and “gender? Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia