Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2020 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Problem-Solving in Mathematics Education

  • Manuel Santos-TrigoEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_129
  • 25 Downloads

Introduction

Problem-solving approaches appear in all human endeavors. In mathematics, activities such as posing or defining problems and looking for different ways to solve them are central to the development of the discipline. In mathematics education, the systematic study of what the process of formulating and solving problems entails and the ways to structure problem-solving approaches to learn mathematics has been part of the research agenda in mathematics education. How have research and practicing problem-solving approaches changed and evolved in mathematics education, and what themes are currently investigated? Two communities have significantly contributed to the characterization and development of the research and practicing agenda in mathematical problem-solving: mathematicians who recognize that the process of formulating, representing, and solving problems is essential in the development of mathematical knowledge (Polya 1945; Hadamard 1945; Halmos 1980) and mathematics...

Keywords

Problem-solving Frameworks Digital technologies Reasoning Collaboration Communication Critical thinking 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Artigue M, Houdement C (2007) Problem solving in France: didactic and curricular perspectives. ZDM Int J Math Educ 39(5–6):365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai J, Nie B (2007) Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: research and practice. ZDM Int J Math Educ 39(5–6):459–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSS) (2010) Common Core State Standards initiative. http://www.corestandards.org/
  4. Devlin K (2002) The millennium problems. The seven greatest unsolved mathematical puzzles of our time. Granta Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Dick TP, Hollebrands K (2011) Focus in high school mathematics: technology to support reasoning and sense making. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, RestonGoogle Scholar
  6. Doorman M, Drijvers P, Dekker T, Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M, de Lange J, Wijers M (2007) Problem solving as a challenge for mathematics education in the Netherlands. ZDM Int J Math Educ 39(5–6):405–418Google Scholar
  7. English LD, Gainsburg J (2016) Problem solving in a 21st-century mathematics curriculum. In: English LD, Kirshner D (eds) Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Routledge, New York, pp 313–335Google Scholar
  8. Hadamard J (1945) An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Halmos PR (1980) The heart of mathematics. Am Math Mon 87(7):519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halmos PR (1994) What is teaching. Am Math Mon 101(9):848–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilbert D (1902) Mathematical problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 8:437–479Google Scholar
  12. Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B (eds) (2010) Mathematics education and technology: rethinking the terrain. The 17th ICMI study. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Krutestkii VA (1976) The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Lester FK, Kehle PE (1994) From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In: Lesh R, Doerr HM (ed) Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahawah: New Jersey, pp 501–517Google Scholar
  15. Lesh R, Zawojewski JS (2007) Problem solving and modeling. In: Lester FK Jr (ed) The second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 763–804Google Scholar
  16. Lester F, Kehle PE (2003) From problem solving to modeling: the evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In: Lesh R, Doerr H (eds) Beyond constructivism: models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 501–518Google Scholar
  17. Liljedahl P, Santos-Trigo M (2019) Mathematical problem solving. Current themes, trends and research,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6 Cham, Switzerland: Springer
  18. NCTM (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM, RestonGoogle Scholar
  19. NCTM (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, RestonGoogle Scholar
  20. NCTM (2009) Focus in high school mathematics. Reasoning and sense making. NCTM, RestonGoogle Scholar
  21. Perkins DN, Simmons R (1988) Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model of science, math, and programming. Rev of Edu Res 58(3):303–326Google Scholar
  22. Polya G (1945) How to solve it. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santos-Trigo M (2007) Mathematical problem solving: an evolving research and practice domain. ZDM Int J Math Educ 39(5, 6):523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Santos-Trigo M, Reyes-Martínez I (2018) High school prospective teachers’ problem-solving reasoning that involves the coordinated use of digital technologies. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1489075
  25. Santos-Trigo M, Reyes-Rodriguez, A (2016) The use of digital technology in finding multiple paths to solve and extend an equilateral triangle task, International. Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 47:1:58–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1049228
  26. Schoenfeld AH (1985) Mathematical problem solving. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Schoenfeld AH (1992) Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In: Grows DA (ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 334–370Google Scholar
  28. Schoenfeld AH (2015) How we think: a theory of human decision-making, with a focus on teaching. In: Cho SJ (ed) The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education. Springer, Cham, pp 229–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selden J, Mason A, Selden A (1989) Can average calculus students solve nonroutine problems? J Math Behav 8:45–50Google Scholar
  30. Wertheimer M (1945) Productive thinking. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research and Advanced Studies, Mathematics Education DepartmentCinvestav-IPNMexico CityMexico

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ruhama Even
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science TeachingThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael