Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2020 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Mathematical Literacy

  • Mogens NissEmail author
  • Eva Jablonka
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100
  • 18 Downloads

Definition

The neologism “mathematical literacy” belongs to an array of related terms that have been used in English language mathematics education research and policy discourses in the context of suggestions for the improvement of mathematics teaching and learning. While diagnosis of some apparent shortcomings seems to coexist with formal mathematics education since its inception in the USA, “mathematical literacy” is linked to the reform narratives of 1980s (Craig 2018). One of the first written occurrences of the term in the USA was in 1944, when a Commission of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) on Post-War Plans (NCTM 1970/2002, p. 244) required that the school should ensure mathematical literacy for all who can possibly achieve it. Shortly after (in 1950), the term was used again in the Canadian Hope Report (NCTM 1970/2002, p. 401). In more recent times, the NCTM 1989 Standards (NCTM 1989, p. 5) in the USA spoke about mathematical literacy and mathematically...

Keywords

Numeracy Quantitative literacy Critical mathematical literacy Mathemacy Matheracy Statistical literacy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brown M, Askew M, Baker D, Denvir H, Millett A (1998) Is the national numeracy strategy research-based? Br J Educ Stud 46:362–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craig J (2018) The promises of numeracy. Educ Stud Math 99:57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Ambrosio U (2003) The role of mathematics in building a democratic society. In: Madison BL, Steen LA (eds) Quantitative literacy: why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. National Council on Education and the Disciplines, Princeton, pp 235–238Google Scholar
  4. de Lange J (2003) Mathematics for literacy. In: Madison BL, Steen LA (eds) Quantitative literacy: why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. National Council on Education and the Disciplines, Princeton, pp 75–89Google Scholar
  5. Department of Basic Education (2011) Mathematical literacy. National curriculum statement. Further education and training phase. Grades 10–12. http://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/CurriculumAssessmentPolicyStatements/CAPSFETPhase/tabid/420/Default.aspx. Accessed 8 Nov 2012
  6. Department of Education and Science/Welsh Office (DES/WO), Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools (1982) Mathematics counts (“The Cockcroft Report”). HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankenstein M (2010) Developing critical mathematical numeracy through real real-life word problems. In: Gellert U, Jablonka E, Morgan C (eds) Proceedings of the sixth international mathematics education and society conference, Berlin. Mathematics education and society, vol 6. Freie Universit€at Berlin, Berlin, pp 248–257Google Scholar
  8. Geiger V, Goos M, Forgasz H (2015) A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: a survey of the state of the field. ZDM 47:531–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gellert U, Jablonka E (2009) The demathematising effect of technology: calling for critical competence. In: Ernest P, Greer B, Sriraman B (eds) Critical issues in mathematics education. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 19–24Google Scholar
  10. Jablonka E (2003) Mathematical literacy. In: Bishop A, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FSK (eds) Second international handbook of mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 75–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jablonka E (2015) The evolvement of numeracy and mathematical literacy curricula and the construction of hierarchies of numerate or mathematically literate subjects. ZDM 47:599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jahnke T, Meyerhöfer W (eds) (2007) Kritisches zu Pisa& Co, 2nd edn. Franzbecker, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Keitel C, Kotzmann E, Skovsmose O (1993) Beyond the tunnel vision: analysing the relationship between mathematics, society and technology. In: Keitel C, Ruthven K (eds) Learning from computers: mathematics education and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B (eds) (2001) Adding it up. Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Madison BL, Steen LA (eds) (2003) Quantitative literacy. Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. National Council on Education and the Disciplines, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. NCTM (1970/2002) A history of mathematics education in the United States and Canada, vol 32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. NCTM (1980) An agenda for action. Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980s. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, RestonGoogle Scholar
  18. NCTM (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, RestonGoogle Scholar
  19. Niss M, Højgaard T (eds) (2011) Competencies and mathematical learning. Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Roskilde University, Department of Science, Systems and Models, IMFUFA, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  20. North M (2010) How mathematically literate are the matriculants of 2008? A critical review of the 2008 grade 12 mathematical literacy examinations. In: de Villiers MD (ed) Proceedings of the 16th annual congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, vol 1. George Campbell School of Technology, Durban, pp 216–230Google Scholar
  21. OECD (1999) Measuring student knowledge and skills: a new framework for assessment. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD (2016) PISA 2015 mathematics framework. In: PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-5-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paulos JA (1989) Innumeracy: mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. PIAAC Numeracy Expert Group (2009) PIAAC numeracy: a conceptual framework. OECD Education working papers, no 35. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Stacey K, Turner R (eds) (2015) Assessing mathematical literacy: the PISA experience. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Venkat H, Graven M (2007) Insights into the implementation of mathematical literacy. In: Setati M, Chitera N, Essien A (eds) Proceedings of the 13th annual national congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, vol 1. Uplands College, Mpumalanga, pp 72–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMFUFA, Department of Science and EnvironmentRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Education and PsychologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Michèle Artigue
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Didactique André Revuz (EA4434)Université Paris-DiderotParisFrance