Photography and Peace

  • Frank MöllerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_14-1

Description

Peace photography is derivative, illustrative, and constitutive of peace: it is dependent on definitions of peace; it exemplifies preexisting understandings of peace; and it shapes and diversifies viewers’ understandings of peace beyond established and taken-for-granted ones. Peace photography is a pluralistic concept. Indeed, different forms of peace require different forms of visual representation just as do different positions on a social group’s trajectory from war to peace. Conversations about different peace photographs – i.e., different photographs that individuals or groups of people regard as depictions of peace – help understand underlying notions of peace as well as the political and social conditions from which these notions emerge. Given that visual images never operate on observers in isolation, it will be very difficult to establish causality between a given photograph and peace. It is, therefore, more productive to conceive of the relationship between...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allan, S. (2011). Documenting war, visualizing peace: Towards peace photography. In I. S. Shaw, J. Lynch, & R. A. Hackett (Eds.), Expanding peace journalism: Comparative and critical approaches (pp. 147–167). Sydney: University of Sidney Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, S. (Ed.). (2017). Photojournalism and citizen journalism: Co-operation, collaboration and connectivity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, S., & Mavlian, S. (Eds.). (2014). Conflict • time • photography. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bleiker, R. (Ed.). (2018). Visual Global Politics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brothers, C. (1997). War and photography: A cultural history. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. (2014). The myth of compassion fatigue. In L. Kennedy & C. Patrick (Eds.), The violence of the image: Photography and international conflict (pp. 97–124). London/New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  7. Delgado, M. (2015). Urban youth and Photovoice: Visual ethnography in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dell, S. (2010). Mediation and immediacy: The press, the popular front in France, and the Spanish civil war. In C. Young (Ed.), The Mexican suitcase: The rediscovered Spanish civil war negatives of Capa, Chim, and Taro (Vol. 1: The history, pp. 37–49). New York/Göttingen: International Center of Photography/Steidl.Google Scholar
  9. Dietrich, W. (2002). Farewell to the one peace. Peace Review, 14, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elkins, J. (2011). What photography is. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emerling, J. (2012). Photography: History and theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L. (2007). No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and Liberal democracy. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harper, D. (2012). Visual Sociology. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herschdorfer, N. (Ed.). (2018). The Thames & Hudson Dictionary of photography. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, J. (2011). ‘The arithmetic of compassion’: Rethinking the politics of photography. British Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 621–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelsey, R., & Stimson, B. (2008). Introduction: Photography’s double index (a short history in three parts). In R. Kelsey & B. Stimson (Eds.), The meaning of photography (pp. vii–xxxi). Williamstown: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, L., & Patrick, C. (Eds.). (2014). The violence of the image: Photography and international conflict. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  18. Linfield, S. (2010). The cruel radiance: Photography and political violence. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lisle, D. (2011). The surprising detritus of leisure: Encountering the Late Photography of War. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacDougall, D. (1998). Transcultural cinema. Edited and with an introduction by Lucien Taylor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mehrez, A. (Ed.). (2019). Don McCullin. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Möller, F. (2013). Visual peace: Images, spectatorship and the politics of violence. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Möller, F. (2019). Peace photography. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Möller, F., & Shim, D. (2019). Visions of peace in international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 20, 246–264.  https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, E. (2011). Believing is seeing (observations on the mysteries of photography). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Morris-Suzuki, T. (2005). The past within us: Media, memory, history. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Paglen, T. (2011). Untitled. Aperture, 204, 67–68.Google Scholar
  29. Perlmutter, D. D. (1999). Visions of war: Picturing warfare from the stone age to the cyber age. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
  30. Reinhardt, M., Edwards, H., & Duganne, E. (Eds.). (2007). Beautiful suffering: Photography and the traffic in pain. Williamsburg: Williams College Museum of Art/Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ritchin, F. (1999). In our own images. New York: Aperture.Google Scholar
  32. Ritchin, F. (2013). Bending the frame: Photojournalism, documentary, and the citizen. New York: Aperture.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, H. (2012). War photographers: A special breed? In A. Wilkes Tucker & W. Michels with N. Zelt (Eds.), War/photography: Images of armed conflict and its aftermath (pp. 8–15). Houston/New Haven/London: Museum of Fine Arts/Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Roberts, J. (2014). Photography and its violations. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saltzman, L. (2010). What remains: Photography and landscape, memory and oblivion. In J. Blessing & N. Trotman (Eds.), Haunted: Contemporary photography Ι video Ι performance (pp. 126–137). New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Sliwinski, S. (2011). Human rights in camera. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, S. M. (2013). At the edge of sight: Photography and the unseen. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solomon-Godeau, A. (1991). Photography at the dock: Essays on photographic history, institutions, and practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire: Performing cultural memory in the Americas. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thompson, J. L. (2013). Why photography matters. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vuori, J. A., & Saugmann Andersen, R. (Eds.). (2018). Visual security studies: Sights and spectacles of insecurity and war. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Wilkes Tucker, A. & Michels, W. with Zelt, N. (2012). War/photography: Images of armed conflict and its aftermath. Houston/New Haven/London: Museum of Fine Arts/Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere Peace Research InstituteTampere UniversityTampereFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Johanna Mannergren Selimovic
    • 1
  • Oliver Richmond
    • 2
  • Gëzim Visoka
    • 3
  1. 1.The Swedish Institute of International AffairsStockholmSweden
  2. 2.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland