Peacebuilding: Utopia and Reality

  • David ChandlerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_12-1

Introduction

Twenty years of international peacebuilding have demonstrated a shift from liberal internationalist hopes for new externally constructed post-conflict domestic orders to a more realist or pragmatic view of the powers of external interveners. Rather than separate case studies, this entry considers the changes in the understanding of the peacebuilding project itself: tracing the shift from the liberal internationalist assumptions of the late 1990s to the pragmatic realism of today. It does this through the lenses of EH Carr’s classic work The Twenty Years’ Crisis, UN policy thinking on the problematic assumptions of international peacebuilding, and the diagnoses in David Lake’s (2016) book The Statebuilder’s Dilemma, which sets out three pragmatic alternatives. The entry concludes that all three of these alternatives can be seen in practice today.

Twenty Year’s Crisis

The shift from “utopian” to “realist” or pragmatic approaches to peacebuilding cannot be grasped without...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Carr, E. H. (1981). The twenty years’ crisis 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Cox, M. (2001). Introduction. In E. H. Carr (Ed.), The twenty year’s crisis 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  3. De Coning, C. (2016). From peacebuilding to sustaining peace: Implications of complexity for resilience and sustainability. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 4(3), 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doyle, M., & Sambanis, N. (2006). Making war and building peace: United Nations peace operations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Duffield, M. (2019). Post-humanitarianism: Governing precarity in the digital world. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Etzione, A. (2016, March 30). Back to nation building? Huffington Post. Available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/amitai-etzioni/back-to-nation-building_b_9576390.html
  7. Lake, D. (2016). The Statebuilder’s dilemma: On the limits of foreign intervention. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lynch, C. (2016, March 23). How to crowdsource the Syrian cease-fire. Foreign Policy.Google Scholar
  10. Pugliese, D. (2016, February 9). Traditional peace-keeping not enough to maintain a Syrian deal: UN report looks to satellites, crowdsourcing. National Post.Google Scholar
  11. United Nations. (1992). An agenda for peace, preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping: Report of the secretary-general pursuant to the statement adopted by the summit meeting of the security council on 31 January 1992. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  12. United Nations. (1995). Supplement to an agenda for peace: Position paper of the secretary-general on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the United Nations. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  13. United Nations. (2000a). Millennium report of the secretary-general, “we the peoples”: The role of the United Nations in the 21st century. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  14. United Nations. (2000b). Brahimi report, report of the panel on United Nations peace operations, United Nations general assembly security council, 21 august. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  15. United Nations. (2015a). Uniting our strengths for peace: Politics, partnership and people, report of the high-level independent panel on United Nations peace operations. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  16. United Nations. (2015b). The challenge of sustaining peace, report of the advisory group of experts for the 2015 review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WestminsterLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kai Michael Kenkel
  • Oliver Richmond
    • 1
  • Gëzim Visoka
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland