Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Participative Teaching Methods for Sustainable Development

  • Eleonora ConcinaEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_411

Synonyms

Definition

Participative teaching methods are didactic methods, strategies and techniques that are focused on encouraging students to become actively involved in their learning process. They also aim to raise students’ awareness and sense of responsibility about the organization, management and evaluation of their educational experience.

Introduction

Participative teaching includes a set of didactic strategies and techniques that aim to promote a more active role of students in the learning process. This implies not only to engage students’ interest in theoretical lessons, encouraging group discussions and critical reflections, but also to involve them in more practical activities, to connect academic achievement with real-life issues and to understand the impact of the individual actions on the community.

Since participative (also participatory)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Biasutti M, Makrakis V, Concina E, Frate S (2018) Educating academic staff to reorient curricula in ESD. Int J Sustain High Educ 19(1):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake J, Sterling S, Goodson I (2013) Transformative learning for a sustainable future: an exploration of pedagogy for a change at an alternative college. Sustainability 5:5347–5372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchs A, Blanchard O (2011) Exploring the concept of sustainable development through role-playing. J Econ Educ 42(4):388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns HL (2015) Transformative sustainability pedagogy: learning from ecological system and indigenous wisdom. J Transform Educ 13(3):259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coffey M (2014) Green chemistry: classroom implementation of an educational board game illustrating environmental sustainable development in chemical manufacturing. In: Thomas KD, Muga HE (eds) Handbook of research in pedagogical innovations for sustainable development. Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 453–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey J (1916) Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey J (1938) Experience & education. Kappa Delta Pi, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dieleman H, Huising D (2006) Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. J Clean Prod 14:837–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Disterheft A, Azeiteiro UM, Leal Filho W, Caeiro S (2015) Participatory processes in sustainable universities – what to assess? Int J Sustain High Educ 16(5):748–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eyler J (2002) Reflection: linking service and learning-linking students and community. J Soc Issues 58(3):517–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fourie M (2003) Beyond the ivory tower: service learning for sustainable community development. South Africa J High Educ 17(1):31–38Google Scholar
  12. Gourmelom F, Chlous-Ducharme F, Kerbiriou K, Rouan M, Bioret F (2013) Role-playing game developed from a modelling process: a relevant participatory tool for sustainable development? A co-construction experiment in an insular biosphere reserve. Land Use Policy 32:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huckle J (1996) Realizing sustainability in changing times. In: Huckle J, Sterling S (eds) Education for sustainability. Earthscan, London, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  14. Keleş Ö (2015) Creative Drama in the teaching of education for sustainable development: sample activity about sustainability and sustainable production. J Environ Sustain 4(4):4Google Scholar
  15. Kucharčíková A, Tokarčíková E (2016) Use of participatory methods in teaching at the university. Online J Sci Technol 6(1):82–90Google Scholar
  16. Lehmann M, Christensen P, Du X, Thrane D (2008) Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. Eur J Eng Educ 33(3):281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma W (2008) Participatory dialogue and participatory learning in a discussion-based graduate seminar. J Lit Res 40:220–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mezirow J (1996) Contemporary paradigm of learning. Adult Educ Q 46(3):158–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mezirow J (2003) Transformative learning as a discourse. J Transform Educ 1(1):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Neill G, McMahon T (2005) Student-centred learning: what does it mean for students and lecturers? In: O’Neill G, Moore S, McMullin B (eds) Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching. AISHE, Dublin, pp 27–36Google Scholar
  21. Perdan S, Azapagic A, Clift R (2000) Teaching sustainable development to engineering students. Int J Sustain High Educ 1(3):267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pohl M, Rester M, Judmaier P (2009) Interactive game based learning: advantages and disadvantages. In: Stephanidis C (ed) Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction, Part III, HCII 2009, LNCS 5616. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 92–101Google Scholar
  23. Rogers C (1962) The interpersonal relationship: the core of guidance. Harv Educ Rev 32(4):416–429Google Scholar
  24. Rogers C (1969) Freedom to learn. Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  25. Romanova KA, Lyshenko MS (2012) A participative approach to teaching and learning in higher school. World Appl Sci J 20(Special Issue of Pedagogy and Psychology):84–89Google Scholar
  26. Sterling S (2001) Sustainable education. Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Sterling S (2010) Learning for resilience or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):511–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sterling S (2010–2011) Transformative learning and sustainability: sketching the conceptual ground. Learn Teach High Educ Issue 5:17–33Google Scholar
  29. Taylor E (2007) An update of transformative learning theory: a critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). Int J Lifelong Educ 26(2):173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor E (2008) Transformative learning theory. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 119:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsien TBK, Tsui M (2007) A participative learning and teaching model: the partnership of students and teachers in practice teaching. Soc Work Educ 26(4):348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ukaga O, Maser C (2004) Evaluating sustainable development. Giving people a voice in their destiny. Stylus Publishing, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  33. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO (2006) Education for sustainable development toolkit. Learning and training tools N° 1. UNESCO, Paris http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001524/152453eo.pdf. Accessed on 4 May 2018Google Scholar
  34. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO (2012) Education for sustainable development sourcebook. Learning & training tools N° 4. UNESCO, Paris http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002163/216383e.pdf. Accessed on 4 May 2018Google Scholar
  35. Vygotskij LS (1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Weimer M (2002) Learner-centered teaching. Five key changes to practice. Jossey Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA)University of PadovaPadovaItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ingrid Molderez
    • 1
  1. 1.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium