Skip to main content

Knowledge Generation and Sustainable Development

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education
  • 69 Accesses

Introduction

This entry sketches the relation between knowledge generation (KG) and sustainable development (SD) as it appears within the realm of Higher Education for Sustainable Development (HESD). The suggestion is to distinguish three forms of appearances: The first relation can be called a passive relation. In this appearance, KG for SD is mainly undertaken by (academic) experts whose results and methods are conveyed to students in forms of canonical knowledge within HESD. The students’ role in KG processes is hence the role of passive recipients of this canonical knowledge. Opposed to this appearance is the active relation. Here, students (and other social actors) are directly included in the process of KG in order to craft applicable solutions to concrete challenges for SD. Moreover, KG is not restricted to the acquisition of explicit knowledge. It also includes the development of tacit forms of knowledge that are deemed important for the prospective professional activities of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barr RB, Tagg J (1995) From teaching to learning – a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Chang Mag High Learn 27(6):12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth M, Michelsen G, Rieckmann M, Thomas I (eds) (2015) Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgrade (1975) International workshop on environmental education. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0002/000276/027608eb.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018

  • Bettencourt LM, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. PNAS 108(49):19540–19545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme T, Geiger SM, Grossman P, Stanszus L, Schrader U (2016) Arbeitsdefinition von Achtsamkeit im Projekt BiNKA, Technical paper. Technische Universität, Berlin Available from: http://achtsamkeit-und-konsum.de/en/publications2/

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JW (1966) Theory of psychological reactance. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A (2011) Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov High Educ 36(2):107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A (2017) Beyond interpersonal competence: teaching and learning professional skills in sustainability. Educ Sci 7(39):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman CH (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):308–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 100(14):8086–8091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, Hibbert S, Smith AP (2007) Why people don‘t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: the role of neutralisation. J Bus Ethics 74:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS 100(14):8059–8061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L, Gallopin C (2016) Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development. PNAS 113(17):4570–4578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry N, Kirwan J (2014) The role of tacit knowledge in developing networks for sustainable agriculture. Sustain Agric 54(3):341–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AB (2005) Wetland sustainability and the evolution of indigenous knowledge in Ethiopia. Geogr J 171(4):306–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorjee D (2016) Defining contemplative science: the metacognitive self-regulatory capacity of the mind, context of meditation practice and modes of existential awareness. Front Psychol 7(1788):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Pisani JA (2006) Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3(2):83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank P (2017). Warum wir Tiere essen (obwohl wir sie mögen): Sozialpsychologische Erklärungsansätze für das Fleischparadox. Psychosozial 40(148):49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank P, Fischer D (2018) Introspektion und Bildung für nachhaltigen Konsum: Ein Lehr-Lern-Format zur systematischen Selbsterforschung in der Auseinandersetzung mit Argumenten zum Konsum tierischer Produkte – Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. In: Leal W (ed) Nachhaltigkeit in der Lehre: eine Herausforderung für Hochschulen. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank P, Sundermann A, Fischer D (forthcoming) Stimulating competence acquisition for sustainable consumption through cultivating introspection in mindfulness training in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research and contemporary science. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson T, Wisner B (2016) ‘Lets talk about you…’ – opening space for local experience, action and learning in disaster risk reduction. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 25(5):664–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychol Rev 108(4):814–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton MG, Nettle D, Andrews PW (2005) The evolution of cognitive bias. In: Buss DM (ed) The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 724–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (2002) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood B, Mellor M, O’Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13(1):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change. Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume T, Barry J (2015) Environmental education and education for sustainable development. Int Encycl Soc Behav Sci 7:733–739

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Universities (IAU). Kyoto declaration on sustainable development. http://www.iau-hesd.net/sites/default/files/documents/sustainable_development_policy_statement.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018

  • Johannesburg (2002) Johannesburg declaration on sustainable development. https://joburg.org.za/pdfs/johannesburgdeclaration.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2018

  • Kates R, Clark W, Corell R, Hall J, Jaeger C et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2011) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(suppl. 1):25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho W (2015) Education for sustainable development in higher education: reviewing needs. In: Transformative approaches to sustainable development at universities. Working across disciplines. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald L, Shriberg M (2016) Sustainability leadership programs in higher education: alumni outcomes and impacts. J Environ Stud Sci 6:360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marten GG (2001) Human ecology – basic concepts for sustainable development. Earthscan Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens P (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2(1):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson FA, Crawford M (1982) The defense motivation system: a theory of avoidance behavior. Behav Brain Sci 5(4):661–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMellan H (1996) Situated learning: multiple perspectives. In: McMellan (ed) Situated learning perspectives. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp 5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen G (2016) Sustainable development: Background and context. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds). (2016) Sustainability science. An introduction. Springer, Dordrecht, 5–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki, Yarime (2016) In: Barth M, Michelsen G, Rieckmann M, Thomas I (eds). (2015) Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis KR, Pekrun R, Sinatra GM, Azevedo R, Tevors G, Meier E, Heddy BC (2015) The curious case of climate change: testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learn Instr 39:168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss A (1972) Shallow and the deep. Inquiry, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation Bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H (2003) Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy 30(3):151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N (2004) The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702):1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) Higher education for sustainable development. Final report of international action research project. https://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/centreforeffectivelearningenvironmentscele/45575516.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2018

  • Pohl R (ed) (2004) Cognitive illusions: a handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory. Psychology Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Oekom, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Power N, Beattie G, McGuire L (2017) Mapping our underlying cognitions and emotions about good environmental behavior: why we fail to act despite the best of intentions. Semiotica 215:193–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain V (2011) Acting on sustainability. Res Sci Educ 4(1):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P, Aydede M (eds) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW (2001) The mutual learning sessions. In: Thompson Klein J, Häberli R, Scholz RW, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Bill A, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Springer, Basel, pp 117–129

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schütte L, Gregory-Smith D (2015) Neutralisation and mental accounting in ethical consumption: the case of sustainable holidays. Sustainability 7:7959–7972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezen-Barrie A, Shea N, Borman JH (2017) Probing into the sources of ignorance: science teachers’ practices of constructing arguments or rebuttals to denialism of climate change. Environ Educ Res 0–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1330949

  • Smith ER, Semin GR (2007) Situated social cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 16(3):132–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol J, Wals AE (2015) Strengthening ecological mindfulness through hybrid learning in vital coalitions. Cult Stud Sci Educ 10(1):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer R (2007) Consumer’s mind: Die Psychologie des Verbrauchers. Deutscher Fachverlag, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley J (2005) Knowledge and practical interests. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strube G, Wender KF (eds) (1993) The cognitive psychology of knowledge. Advances in psychology, vol 103. New Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (2004) Ethical fading: the role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Soc Justice Res 17(2):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorén H, Breian L (2016) Stepping stone or stumbling block? Mode 2 knowledge production in sustainability science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler R (2011) Socio-scientific issues, sustainability and science education. Research in Scienc Education. Res Sci Educ 42:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (1972) Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 16 June 1972. Available: http://www.unep.org/Documents/Default.asp?DocumentID¼97&ArticleID¼1503. Accessed 4 Jan 2018

  • UN (1993) Agenda 21: the United Nations programme of action from Rio: Earth Summit. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2017) General assembly 11 December 2017: sustainable development: education for sustainable development. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N17/435/17/PDF/N1743517.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 13 Feb 2018

  • UNESCO (1977) Tbilisi Declaration. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/tbilisi.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  • UNESCO (2018a) Education for sustainable development. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development. Accessed 12 Jan 2018

  • UNESCO (2018b) Global action programme on education for sustainable development. https://en.unesco.org/gap. Accessed 12 Jan 2018

  • van Dijk T (2009) Society and discourse: how social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vilsmaier U, Engbers M, Luthardt P, Maas-Deipenbrock RM, Wunderlich S, Scholz RW (2015) Case-based Mutual Learning Sessions: knowledge integration and transfer in transdisciplinary processes. Sustain Sci 10:563–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Hanscom L, Lin D (2017) Making the sustainable development goals consistent with sustainability. Front Energy Res 5:18–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler C (2018) Mind the gap: the role of mindfulness in adapting to increasing risk and climate change. Sustain Sci 13:1121–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler C, Brossmann J, Hendersson H, Kristjansdottir R, McDonald C, Scarampi P (2018) Mindfulness in sustainability science, practice, and teaching. Sustain Sci 13(1):143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Lang D (2016) Transformational sustainability research methodology. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds). (2016) Sustainability science. An introduction. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Frank .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Frank, P. (2019). Knowledge Generation and Sustainable Development. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_409

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics