Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Sustainability and Life Cycle Cost Analysis

  • Tanja SrebotnjakEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_391

Definition

Sustainability is the goal to create and maintain conditions suitable for human life and well-being. Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis is a method for calculating the total cost of ownership of an asset (e.g., a building) over its entire useful life span. It is also referred to as “cradle to grave” cost analysis and is related to life cycle assessment (LCA). Costs included in LCC are the financial costs to design, build, operate, and dispose of the asset as well as the environmental and social costs associated with it, for which LCA can provide estimates. Designing assets with low LCC and LCA impacts thus serves the overarching goal of sustainability.

Introduction

Sustainability is broadly defined as the goal to “create and maintain the conditions under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony to support present and future generations” (EPA 2018). Closely related to sustainability is the paradigm of sustainable development, which the 1987 Brundtland Commission...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brundtlandt Commission (1987) Our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 06 June 2018
  2. Ciroth A (2009) Cost data quality considerations for eco-efficiency measures. ECOL ECON, 68(6):1583–1590Google Scholar
  3. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice & Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  4. EPA (2018) Learn about sustainability. https://www.epa.gov/sustainability/learn-about-sustainability#what. Accessed 06 June 2018
  5. Gluch P, Baumann H (2004) The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Build Environ 39(5):571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. GSA (2018) Life cycle costing. https://www.gsa.gov/node/81412
  7. Harvey G (1976) Life-cycle costing: a review of the technique. Manag Account 15:343–347Google Scholar
  8. Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (2008) Environmental life cycle costing. CRC Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ISO (International Standards Organization) (2006a) International standard ISO 14040: environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and framework. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. ISO (International Standards Organization) (2006b) International standard ISO 14044: environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  11. ISO (International Standards Organization) (2017) Buildings and constructed assets – service life planning – part 5: life-cycle costing. https://www.iso.org/standard/61148.html
  12. Kaufman RJ (1970) Life cycle costing: a decision-making tool for capital equipment acquisition. Cost Manag 2:21–28Google Scholar
  13. Lélé S, Norgaard RB (1996) Sustainability and the scientist’s burden. Conserv Biol 10(2):354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G, Huppes G, Ciroth A, Seuring S, Schmidt WP, Günther E, Hoppe H, Swarr T, Hunkeler D (2008) Introduction: history of life cycle costing, its categorization, and its basic framework. In: Environmental life cycle costing. pp 30–45. CRC Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  15. Neumayer E (2003) Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  16. Okano K (2001) Life cycle costing-an approach to life cycle cost management: a consideration from historical development. Asia Pac Manag Rev 6(3):317–341Google Scholar
  17. Pré (2012) Life cycle costing in more detail. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/news/life-cycle-costing-in-more-detail. Accessed 06 June 2018
  18. Pré (2013) ReCiPe report. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/news/recipe-report. Accessed 06 June 2018
  19. Rebitzer G, Hunkeler D (2003) Life cycle costing in LCM: ambitions, opportunities, and limitations. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(5):253–256Google Scholar
  20. Stanford University. Land and Buildings (2005) Guidelines for life cycle cost analysis. https://sustainable.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Guidelines_for_Life_Cycle_Cost_Analysis.pdf. Accessed 06 July 2018
  21. Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen H-L, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. Society of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology (SETAC), PensacolaGoogle Scholar
  22. UNEP (2018) Life cycle initiative. Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/starting-life-cycle-thinking/life-cycle-approaches/social-lca/. Accessed 06 June 2018
  23. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Earthprint, StevenageGoogle Scholar
  24. Woodward DG (1997) Life cycle costing – theory, information acquisition and application. Int J Proj Manag 15(6):335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hixon Center for Sustainable Environmental DesignHarvey Mudd CollegeClaremontUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Pinar Gökçin Özuyar
    • 1
  1. 1.Istinye UniversityIstanbulTurkey