Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Digital Learning and Sustainable Development

  • Sara Becker
  • Daniel OttoEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_374

Synonyms

Definition

Digital Learning: In the literature, there is quite a variety of definitions and conceptualizations of teaching and learning with the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and the internet: E-Learning, Online-Learning, Blended Learning, and Mobile Learning – at first sight, all these notions seem to be more or less synonyms. But it is useful to differentiate between these different concepts in order to understand all the facets of digital learning:

E-Learning: The early understanding of E-Learning (nowadays called: E-Learning 1.0) is the provision of digitalized learning materials (e.g., PDFs) by teachers via a Learning Management System (e.g., Moodle or Blackboard). Learners use digitalized learning materials for their rather isolated learning process. Communication and collaboration are not constitutive for this very basic form...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnold P, Kilian L, Thillosen A, Zimmer G (2011) Handbuch E-Learning. Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien. Bertelsmann, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  2. Avgerinou M, Bertoldi P, Castellazzi L (2017) Trends in data centre energy consumption under the European Code of Conduct for data centre energy efficiency. Energies 10(1470):1–18Google Scholar
  3. Barth M, Burandt S (2013) Adding the “E-” to learning for sustainable development: challenges and innovation. Sustainability 5(6):1609–2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC (2014) Climate challenge. Why make a game about climate change? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/hottopics/climatechange/climate_challenge/aboutgame.shtml Accessed 27 Feb 2019
  5. Bell F, Keegan H, Zaitseva E (2007) Designing virtual student mobility. Paper for the Education in a changing environment conference, University of Salford, September 2007, pp 59–67Google Scholar
  6. Bernhard T, Kirchner M (2007) E-Learning 2.0 im Einsatz. Verlag Werner Hülsbusch, BoizenburgGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjørke SA (2011) E-Learning for sustainable development – rationale, strategies and actions. Int J Media Technol Lifelong Learn 7(2):79–93Google Scholar
  8. Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  9. Caird S, Lane A, Swithenby E, Roy R, Potter S (2015) Design of higher education teaching models and carbon impacts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 16(1):96–111.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0065
  10. Campbell JE, Campbell DE (2011) Distance learning is good for the environment: savings in greenhouse gas emissions. Online J Dist Learn Adm 14(4). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/76605/
  11. Davies JC, Dunk RM (2016) Flying along the supply chain: accounting for emissions from student air travel in the higher education sector. Carbon Manag 6(5–6):233–246Google Scholar
  12. de Witt C, Gloerfeld C (2018) Mobile learning and higher education. In: Kergel D, Heidkamp B, Kjærsdam Telléus P, Rachwal T, Nowakowski S (eds) The digital turn in higher education. International perspectives on learning and teaching in a changing world. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp 61–79Google Scholar
  13. Freire P (2010) Pedagogy of the opressed. New York and London: continuum. Retrieved from http://web.msu.ac.zw/elearning/material/1335344125freire_pedagogy_of_the_oppresed.pdf
  14. Graham Attwell (2007) Personal Learning Environments -the future of eLearning? Elearning Papers 2(1):1887–1542. Retrieved from http://digtechitalia.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/88358195/Atwell2007.pdf
  15. Handke J (2015) Handbuch Hochschullehre Digital. Tectum, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidkamp B, Kergel D (2018) From E-learning to eBologna in an augmented reality. In: Kergel D, Heidkamp B, Kjærsdam Telléus P, Rachwal T, Nowakowski S (eds) The digital turn in higher education. International perspectives on learning and teaching in a changing world. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp 37–45Google Scholar
  17. Ifenthaler D (2017) Designing effective digital learning environments: toward learning analytics design. Technol Knowl Learn 22(3):401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N (2013) Serious games for sustainable development. J Manag Educ 37:889–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kergel D, Heidkamp B, Kjærsdam Telléus P, Rachwal T, Nowakowski S (2018) Introduction to the book: the digital turn in higher education. Multi-disciplinary and international perspectives. In: Kergel D, Heidkamp B, Kjærsdam Telléus P, Rachwal T, Nowakowski S (eds) The digital turn in higher education. International perspectives on learning and teaching in a changing world. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  20. Kumar RA (2009) E-Learning 2.0.: learning redefined. Libr Philos Pract 2009:1–5Google Scholar
  21. Loer K, Brockmann N (2016) Was nützt Seamless Learning als neues didaktisches Konzept in der Politikwissenschaft? Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 11(4):79–91Google Scholar
  22. Lombardi MM, Oblinger DG (2007) Authentic learning for the 21st century: an overview. EDUCause Learning Initiative Paper. http://m.alicechristie.org/classes/530/EduCause.pdf. Accessed 06 Mar 2018
  23. McAuley A, Stewart B, Siemens G, Cormier D (2010) The MOOC Model for digital practice. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf. Accessed 04 Mar 2018
  24. Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M (2013) The effectiveness of online- and blended learning. Teach Coll Rec 115:1–47Google Scholar
  25. Otto D (2017) Students’ interaction for enhancing learning motivation and learning success: findings from integrating a simulation game into a university. In: Proceedings of INTED2017 conference, pp 1316–1324Google Scholar
  26. Otto D, Becker S (2016) Lernkulturen im (Klima-)Wandel. Digital Storytelling zur Kompetenzvermittlung in interkulturellen Lehr-Lernsettings. In: Dörner O, Iller C, Pätzold H, Robak S (eds) Differente Lernkulturen – regional, national, transnational. Barbara Budrich, Opladen, pp 101–112Google Scholar
  27. Ozawa-Meida L, Brockway P, Letten K, Davies J, Fleming P (2013) Measuring carbon performance in a UK University through a consumption-based carbon footprint: De Montford University case study. J Clean Prod 56:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pérez Solgado F, de Kraker J, Boon J, Van der Klink M (2012) Competences for climate change education in a virtual mobility setting. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 2012(1):53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K (2008) Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(2):116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. United Nations (UN) (2017) Sustainable Development Goal 4. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/. Accessed 06 Mar 2018
  31. Versteijlen M, Pérez Solgado F, Janssen Groesbeek M, Counotte A (2017) Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 28:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Cultural and Social SciencesFernUniversität in HagenHagenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Distance Studies of Environmental SciencesFernUniversität in HagenHagenGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Petra Molthan-Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK