Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Possibilities and Limits of Life Cycle Assessment in Sustainability Reviews

  • Petra SchneiderEmail author
  • Andreas Meyer
  • Christoph Dobler
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_288

Abstract

The contribution discusses the methodology of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with its performance steps Life Cycle Inventory Assessment (LCIA), Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCI), as well as the Life Cycle interpretation and illustrates the practical application using the LCA for aluminum foil. Further, the contribution discusses the possibilities and limits of LCA in sustainability reviews. For this purpose, the method of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) was developed (Zamagni et al. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637, 2013; Guinée, Life cycle sustainability assessment: what is it and what are its challenges? In: Clift R, Druckman A (eds) Taking stock of industrial ecology. Springer, Cham, 2016), where the life cycle approach is applied to all dimensions of sustainability (environmental, economic, and social) in order to achieve more reliable and robust results. Even the conventional LCA methodology according to ISO 14040:2006 does not consider social aspects, it is a valuable tool to contribute to the assessment of the sustainability of value chains of products. Further, the differences between LCA and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) are discussed. It is important to be noted, that LCA does not replace EIA, even it can contribute to an EIA. As such, LCA, EIA and LCSA must be part of teaching programs in higher education in order to create awareness of the environmental and sustainability assessment tools, as well as their possibilities and limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Boustead I (1996) LCA – how it came about – the beginning in the U.K. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:147–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bringezu S, Bleischwitz R (2009) Sustainable resource management: global trends, visions and policies. Greenleaf Publishing, ISBN-13: 978-1906093266Google Scholar
  3. Bringezu S, Schütz H (2001a) Total material resource flows of the United Kingdom. A study of the Wuppertal Institute for the Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Final report 6 JanGoogle Scholar
  4. Bringezu S, Schütz H (2001b) Material use indicators for the European Union, 1980–1997, economy-wide material flow accounts and balances and derived indicators of resource use, Eurostat working papers 2/2001/B/2, 29 June 2001, 111 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Caruso MC, Menna C, Asprone D, Prota A, Manfredi G (2017) Methodology for life-cycle sustainability assessment of building structures. ACI Struct J 114-S27:323–336.  https://doi.org/10.14359/51689426
  6. Chayer J-A, Kicak K (2015) Life cycle assessment of coffee consumption: comparison of single-serve coffee and bulk coffee brewing. Quantis Canada study for PAC, Packaging Consortium. http://www.pac.ca/assets/pac0680-full-lca.pdf
  7. Directive 2011/92/EU. of the European Parliament and of the council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment text with EEA relevanceGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobler C (2017) Beispielhafte Erarbeitung einer Wertschöpfungskette und einer Ökobilanz von Aluminium. Semesterarbeit Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (2017) Environmental impact assessment of projects. Guidance on the preparation of the environmental impact assessment report. European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. Guinée JB (2012) Life cycle assessment: past, present and future. In: International symposium on life cycle assessment and construction, pp 9–11. Nantes. 10–12 JulyGoogle Scholar
  11. Guinée JB (2016) Life cycle sustainability assessment: what is it and what are its challenges? In: Clift R, Druckman A (eds) Taking stock of industrial ecology. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  12. Helsinki University of Technologie (2017) The application of LCA in the aluminium industry. CASE STUDY for LCA in aluminium industry. Hg. v. Helsinki University of Technologie. http://emrtk.uni-miskolc.hu/projektek/adveng/home/kurzus/kornyezetvede-lem/3_konzultacio_elemei/1/sec13_2.htm. 9 July 2017
  13. Huijbregts MAJ et al (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138–147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humbert S et al (2012) IMPACT 2002+: user guide. Quantis, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt RG, Franklin WE (1996) LCA – how it came about – personal reflections on the origin and the development of LCA in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:4–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2013a) Working group I contribution of the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013. The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 53Google Scholar
  17. IPCC (2013b) Working group I contribution of the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climate change 2013 the physical science basis. Appendix 8.A. Cambridge University Press. New York, pp 731–737Google Scholar
  18. ISO 14001:2015 (ISO 14001). Environmental management systems – requirements with guidance for useGoogle Scholar
  19. ISO 14040:2006 (ISO 14040). Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and frameworkGoogle Scholar
  20. ISO 14044:2006 (ISO 14044). Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  21. Joint Research Center European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment (EPLCA). http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ResourceDirectory/faces/databases/databaseList.xhtml. 18 Dec 2017
  22. Klöppfer W, Grahl B (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) a guide to best practice. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 127–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira VG, Torregrosa-López JI, Capuz-Rizo SF (2017) Organizational life cycle assessment: suitability for higher education institutions with environmental management systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1928.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1289-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Environmental Agency (2012) Prozessorientierte Basisdaten für Umweltmanagementinstrumente (ProBas) – Umweltprofil Kalkstein. http://www.probas.umweltbundesamt.de/php/prozessdetails.php?id={7D146B3C-EEAF-4EF4-B212-795CF9004CAD}. 20 Dec 2017
  25. National Environmental Agency (2016) Prüfung und Aktualisierung der Ökobilanzen für Getränkeverpackungen. Dessau-Roßlau. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/texte_19_2016_pruefung_und_aktualisierung_der_oekobilanzen_fuer_gertaenkeverpackungen_0.pdf
  26. Oberbacher B, Nikodem H, Klöpffer W (1996) LCA – how it came about – an early system analysis of packaging for liquids. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:62–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978644
  27. Perriman RJ (1993) A summary of SETAC guidelines for life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 1:209–212. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959652693900235
  28. ProBas (2004) Aluminium, sekundär. Hg. v. umweltbundesamt. http://www.probas.umweltbundesamt.de/php/prozessdetails.php?id={3492B409-0B8D-4CF1-B421-66547769222B}. 10 July
  29. ProBas (2017) ProBas– Glossar. Hg. v. Umweltbundesamt. http://www.probas.umweltbundesamt.de/php/glossar.php. 9 July 2017
  30. Schneider P, Lüderitz V (2018) Integration of ecosystem services as part of the nexus approach into the applied teaching of ecological engineering. In: Leal W (eds) Handbook of sustainability science and research. World sustainability series, pp 369–387.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_22, ISBN: 978-3-319-63006-9 (online first)
  31. The Aluminium Association (2013) The environmental footprint of semi-finished Aluminium products in North America. A life cycle assessment report. http://www.alumi-num.org/sites/default/files/LCA_Report_Aluminium_Association_12_13.pdf. 9 July 2017
  32. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, United Nations – Sustainable Development knowledge platform. 25 Sept 2015Google Scholar
  33. University of Leiden (2017) CML-IA characterisation factors. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-output/science/cml-ia-characterisation-factors. 3 Aug 2018
  34. Zamagni A, Pesonen HL, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0648-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Schneider
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas Meyer
    • 1
  • Christoph Dobler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Water, Environment, Civil Engineering and SafetyUniversity of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-StendalMagdeburgGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Madhavi Venkatesan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA