Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Interdisciplinarity and Sustainable Development

  • Ann CrabbéEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_215

Synonyms

Introduction

Interdisciplinarity is an umbrella term that is used to designate the collaboration between disciplines.

The term discipline is adapted from the Latin word disciplina, meaning “a branch of instruction or education; a department of learning or knowledge” (Aram 2004). While the term discipline has been used since the early Middle Ages to signify a way of ordering knowledge for teaching and learning, the idea and practice of knowledge exchange between disciplines are used since the mid-1920s. However, the rise of interdisciplinarity on the science policy agenda only started at the end of the twentieth century, fitting into a wider context of cultural changes that took place in the western world in the late 1960s (Wernli et al. 2016). In 1970, a conference of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) identified interdisciplinary research as a means to respond to both changing societal and scientific challenges (Apostel et...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ackers A, De Vries N (2004) Evaluatie NWO/Novem stimuleringsprogramma energieonderzoek. Bosch en DuinGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A, Michaud G (1972) Interdisciplinarity: problems of teaching and research in universities. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Aram JD (2004) Concepts of interdisciplinarity: configurations of knowledge and action. Hum Relat 57:379–412.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704043893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darbellay F (2015) Rethinking inter- and transdisciplinarity: undisciplined knowledge and the emergence of a new thought style. Futures 65:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darbellay F, Moody Z, Sedooka A, Steffen G (2014) Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creat Res J 26:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Boer Y, de Gier A, Verschuur M, de Wit B (2006) Building bridges. Researchers on their experiences with interdisciplinary research in the Netherlands. RMNO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  7. Filemyr A (1999) Interdisciplinarity as commitment to social change. Netw: Issues Ideas 16:8–13Google Scholar
  8. Fiore S (2008) Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: how the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Res 39:251–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franks D, Dale P, Hindmarsh R, Fellows C, Buckridge M, Cybinski P (2007) Interdisciplinary foundations: reflecting on interdisciplinarity and three decades of teaching and research at Griffith University, Australia. Stud High Educ 32:167–185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701267228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein JT (2008) Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. Am J Prev Med 35:S116–S123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larivière V, Haustein S, Börner K (2015) Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact. PLoS One 10:e0122565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lattuca LR (2003) Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded definitions from college and university faculty. History of Intellectual Culture 3:1–20Google Scholar
  13. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) Limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Nissani M (1995) Fruits, salads, and smoothies: a working definition of interdisciplinarity. J Educ Thought 29:121–128Google Scholar
  15. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Piaget J (1972) L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In: L’interdisciplinarité Problèmes d’enseignement et de Recherche Dans Les Université. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosenfield PL (1992) The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 35: 1343–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stokols D, Misra S, Moser RP, Hall KL, Taylor BK (2008) The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prev Med 35:S96–S115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342: 468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. WCED (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Wernli D, Darbellay F, Maes K (2016) Interdisciplinarity and the 21st century research-intensive university. LERU position paperGoogle Scholar
  22. Yegros-Yegros A, Rafols I, D’Este P (2015) Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity. PLoS One 10:e0135095CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences, Research Group Environment and SocietyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ingrid Molderez
    • 1
  1. 1.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium