Innovative Approaches to Learning Sustainable Development
To become a good and critical learner one must acquire facility with the following three tools: the ability to doubt and to ask good questions; the willingness to imagine; and the ability to listen and engage in constructive dialogue. The goal of education is to encourage thinking – not so much what to think but, specifically, how to think. Thus, our overall goal in developing learning tools is not to reach the final state of knowledge in which everything is known, but to consistently refine and modify these tools and approaches in order to advance our understanding of the world (Reardon et al. 2018).
Sustainability learning approaches require new ways of transdisciplinary knowledge production with involvement of actors from outside of academia in order to meet the goals of sustainability science as a community-based transformational scientific field. Thus, innovative approaches to learning in sustainable development should include broad range of the communities actively...
This research was co-financed by a grant (No. S-MIP-17–122) from the Research Council of Lithuania.
- Bogt HJ, Scapens RW (2016) Performance measurement in universities. Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems. Eur Account Rev 21(3):451–497Google Scholar
- Economic Commission for Europe (2013) Empowering Education for a Sustainable Future. Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development. Geneva, p 44Google Scholar
- Editorial (2007) The University of the Future. Nature 446,949 https://doi.org/10.1038/446949a
- Nesbit ES, Cruickshank HJ, Nesbit CJ (2013) Educational principles for engineering education for sustainable development: experiences from U.K. and Canada. In: Proceedings of engineering education for sustainable development EESD13, Cambridge, 22–25 Sept 2013, Paper 69Google Scholar
- Orr DW (2011) Oberlin project. Oberlin Alumni Magazin.Google Scholar
- Orr D (2014) The Oberlin project. Solut J Earth Inc 5(1):7–12Google Scholar
- Reardon J, Madi MA, Cato MS (2018) Introducing a New Economics: Pluralist, Sustainable & Progressive. Pluto press, p. 364Google Scholar
- Roorda N (2010) Sailing on the winds of change. The odyssey to sustainability by the universities of applied sciences in the Netherlands. Ph.D. thesis, Maastricht UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Shriberg M (2000) Sustainability management in campus housing – a case study at the University of Michigan. Int J Sustain High Educ 1(2):137–153Google Scholar
- Staniškis JK (2016) Sustainable university: beyond the third mission. Environ Res Eng Manag 2(72):8–20Google Scholar
- Thomson G (2013) System integration for sustainable outcomes a proposed curriculum. In: Proceedings of engineering education for sustainable development EESD13, pp 650–660Google Scholar
- Trencher G, Yarime M, McCormick KB, Doll C N, Kraines SB (2013) Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Sci Public Policy 41(2):151–179Google Scholar
- Valderrama A, Jorgensen U, Mathiesen BV, Remmen A (2013) A how is sustainability incorporated into the engineering curriculum? The case of DTU and AAU. In: Proceedings of engineering education for sustainable development EESD13, pp 291–302Google Scholar
- Velazquez L, Munguia N, Esquer J (2011) Engineers for more sustainable industrial engineering. In: Filho WL (ed) World trends in education for sustainable development. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 173–184Google Scholar
- Wangel J, Hojer M, Pargman D, Svane O (2013) Engineers of the future: using scenarios methods in sustainable development education. In: Proceedings of education for sustainable development EESD13, Cambridge, 22–25 Sept 2013, Paper 107, 704–713Google Scholar