Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Transdisciplinary Processes for Sustainable Development

  • Marc CrapsEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_102

Definition

Transdisciplinary processes for Sustainable Development refer to the relational characteristics of the collaboration between academic and non-academic actors that are necessary to address the complex conceptual, value-laden and action-driven challenges of sustainable development.

Introduction

Sustainable development assumes a holistic approach to the complex human-ecosystem interrelationships. Such an approach requires an intense collaborative effort between a variety of academic and nonacademic actors with different knowledge traditions, perspectives on, and interests in the way they experience and frame sustainability-related issues. This is contrary to the dominating practices in higher education based on specialization in disconnected disciplines. Higher education requires research and learning practices that stimulate specialists from different fields to engage in collaborative activities with nonacademic actors that contribute to sustainable development. Due attention...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aram JD (2004) Concepts of interdisciplinarity: configurations of knowledge and action. Hum Relat 57:379.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704043893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning II. Addisson-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of participation. J Am Plan Assoc 35(4):216–224Google Scholar
  4. Ayre M, Nettle R (2015) Doing integration in catchment management research: insights into a dynamic learning process. Environ Sci Policy. Elsevier Ltd 47:18–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bammer G (2008) Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges. Res Policy 37(5):875–887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouwen R (2001) Developing relational practices for knowledge intensive organizational contexts. Career Dev Int 6(7):361–369.  https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouwen R, Taillieu T (2004) Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14(March):137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaffin BC et al (2016) Transformative environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:399–423.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler D, Torbert B (2003) Transforming inquiry and action: interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Res 1(2):133–152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030012002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke B (1998) Participation, “process” and management: lessons for development in the history of Organization Development. J Int Dev 10(1):35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craps M et al (2004) Constructing common ground and re-creating differences between professional and indigenous communities in the Andes. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14(5):378.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craps M, Grieten S, Bouwen R (2016) Co-creating the future now. In: Achten V, Bouckaert G, Schokkaert E (eds) A truly golden handbook. The scholarly quest for Utopia. Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp 248–261Google Scholar
  13. Cundill G, Roux DJ, Parker JN (2015) Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research. Ecol Soc 20(2).  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07580-200222
  14. Dewulf A et al (2005) How indigenous farmers and university engineers create actionable knowledge for sustainable irrigation. Action Res 3(2):175–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305052141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelenbos J, Bressers N, Vandenbussche L (2017) Evolution of interdisciplinary collaboration: what are stimulating conditions? Sci Public Policy 44(July):451–463.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Folke C, Chapin FS, Olsson P (2009) Transformations in ecosystem stewardship. In: Chapin FS, Olsson P (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship. Springer, New York, pp 103–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerritsen AL, Stuiver M, Termeer CJAM (2013) Knowledge governance: an exploration of principles, impact, and barriers. Sci Public Policy 40(5):604–615.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray B (1989) Collaborating. Finding common ground for multi-party problems. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray B (2008a) Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. Am J Prev Med 35(2 Suppl):S124–S132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray B (2008b) The process of partnership construction: anticipating obstacles and enhancing the likelihood of successful partnerships for sustainable development. In: Partnerships, governance and sustainable development. Reflections on theory and practice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 29–48Google Scholar
  21. Gray B, Purdy J (2018) Collaborating for our future. Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huxham C, Vangen S (2005) Managing to collaborate. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein JT (2015) Reprint of “Discourses of transdisciplinarity: looking back to the future”. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 65:10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawrence RJ (2015) Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures 65:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Brien L, Marzano M, White RM (2013) “Participatory interdisciplinarity”: towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production. Sci Public Policy 40(1):51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polk M (2015) Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 65:110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Popa F, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 65:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scharmer O, Kaufer K (2013) Leading from the emerging future. From ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  29. Senge PM et al (2007) Collaborating for systemic change. Sloan Manag Rev 48(Winter):44Google Scholar
  30. Sips K, Craps M, Dewulf A (2013) Local participation in complex technological projects as bridging between different communities in Belgium. Knowl Manag Dev J 9(3):95–115Google Scholar
  31. Uhl-Bien M (2006) Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadersh Q 17(6):654–676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246.  https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whyte WF (1989) Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research. Sociol Forum 4(3):367–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams A et al (2017) Systems thinking: a review of sustainability management research. J Clean Prod. Elsevier Ltd 148:866–881.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Management, Centre for Corporate SustainabilityKU LeuvenBrusselsBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib
    • 1
  • Tehmina Khan
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of AccountingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia