Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Technological Enhancement and Sustainability

  • Adam WongEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_101


Technological enhancement and sustainability can be defined as ‘improving the results of higher education through the use of information and communication technologies in a sustainable way’.


As higher education becomes more important and affordable, and the costs of hiring teachers on the increase, there is a need to find sustainable ways that allow students in higher education to better achieving their learning outcomes, without using methods such as small-class teaching or distance learning. e-Learning can be the answer to this problem. The idea of e-learning and its applications have gotten impressive consideration lately. While many teachers at schools from primary schools to colleges know about this new learning mode, many are still dubious whether the selection of this innovation for learning would be appropriate for them. Instructors who need to embrace e-learning might not have obtained the adequate information and experience to adjust their present...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bentz M (2014) New trends in instructional design and E-learning. In: Paper presented at the Conference proceedings. The future of educationGoogle Scholar
  2. Caldwell JE (2007) Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ 6(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gikas J, Grant MM (2013) Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet High Educ 19:18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kirk JJ (2002) E-learning: an executive summary. Killian Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina (NC)Google Scholar
  5. Lin N, Chen G, Zheng K, Tang Y (2014) Clusoaf: A cluster-based semantic oriented analyzing framework for user behaviors in mobile learning environment. In International Conference on Human Centered Computing (pp. 340–351). Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  6. Lindquist D, Denning T, Kelly M, Malani R, Griswold WG, Simon B (2007) Exploring the potential of mobile phones for active learning in the classroom. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Covington. http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~wgg/Abstracts/fp142-lindquist.pdf
  7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2019) About OCW. Accessible on https://ocw.mit.edu/about/
  8. McLoone S, Villing R, O’Keeffe S (2015) A novel smart device student response system for supporting high quality active learning in the engineering and science disciplines. AISHE-J 7(2):2071Google Scholar
  9. Micheletto MJ (2011) Using audience response systems to encourage student engagement and reflection on ethical orientation and behavior. Contemp Issues Educ Res 4(10):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K (2011) E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High Educ 14(2):129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pappas C (2015) Top eLearning statistics and facts for 2015: eLearning industry. eLearning industry, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Park SY, Nam MW, Cha SB (2012) University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. Br J Educ Technol 43(4):592–605Google Scholar
  13. Şad SN, Göktaş Ö (2014) Preservice teachers’ perceptions about using mobile phones and laptops in education as mobile learning tools. Br J Educ Technol 45(4):606–618.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2016) PolyU launches online MicroMasters in international hospitality management. Media Releases. Available at https://www.polyu.edu.hk/web/en/media/media_releases/index_id_6264.html
  15. Thornton P, Houser C (2005) Using Mobile phones in English education in Japan. J Comput Assist Learn 21(3):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. van de Oudeweetering K, Agirdag O (2018) MOOCS as accelerators of social mobility? A systematic review. J Educ Technol Soc 21(1):1–11Google Scholar
  17. Wang M, Shen R, Novak D, Pan X (2009) The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviours and performance: report from a large blended classroom. Br J Educ Technol 40(4):673–695.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Withey C (2010) Engaging students through electronic voting-clickers and mobile phone systems: PollEverywhere. University of Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Yeung C (2016) Nurse trio punished over patient’s death, The Standard, p 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The School of Professional Education and Executive Development, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong

Section editors and affiliations

  • Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib
    • 1
  • Tehmina Khan
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of AccountingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia