Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Computing Education, Outcomes of

  • Anita JuškevičienėEmail author
  • Don Passey
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_89
  • 1 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

In this entry, how outcomes of computing education can be conceived and considered is initially discussed. Later, returning to explore more deeply the current situation across a range of countries, identifying contemporary outcomes of computing education.

The underpinning subject area for computing education, computer science (CS), is quite a young science, which has different names worldwide. In order to demonstrate the variety of terminologies applied to this subject area, the Word Cloud of 71 (Falkner et al. 2014) shows that the words most frequently associated are computer, science, and programming. Similarly, a chart of Google Trends shows that programming and computer science terms were the most popular keywords used in the Google search engine worldwide between May 2017 and May 2018 (see Fig. 1).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Australian Curriculum (AC) Digital Technologies (DT) (2018a) Structure. http://www.victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/technologies/digital-technologies/introduction/structure. Accessed 4 June 2018
  2. Australian Curriculum (AC) Digital Technologies (DT) (2018b) Learning in digital technologies. http://www.victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/technologies/digital-technologies/introduction/learning-in-digital-technologies. Accessed 4 June 2018
  3. Australian Government Department of Education and Training (2018) Australian curriculum. ICT vs digital technologies. https://www.digitaltechnologieshub.edu.au/teachers/australian-curriculum/ict-vs-digital-technologies. Accessed 22 June 2018
  4. Baron GL, Drot-Delange B, Grandbastien M, Tort F (2014) Computer science education in French secondary schools: Historical and didactical perspectives. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 14(2):11Google Scholar
  5. Berry M (2013) Computing in the national curriculum. A guide for primary teachers. Computing At SchoolGoogle Scholar
  6. Bocconi S, Chioccariello A, Dettori G, Ferrari A, Engelhardt K, Kampylis P, Punie Y (2016) Exploring the field of computational thinking as a 21st century skill. In: Proceedings of the international conference on education and new learning technologies, Barcelona, pp 4725–4733Google Scholar
  7. Brazdeikis V (2017) Lithuania. Country Report on ICT in Education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  8. Bučková H, Dostál J (2017) Comparative research of the content of informatics as a teaching subject at basic schools in the Czech republic and Slovakia. In: EDULEARN2017.  https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.1046
  9. Cabrera-Delgado J (2017) Computational science in the educational curriculum. Las Ciencias de la Computación en el currículo educativo. Avances en Supervisión Educativa, 27.  https://doi.org/10.23824/ase.v0i27.584
  10. Choi J, An S, Lee Y (2015) Computing education in Korea – current issues and endeavors. ACM Trans Comput Educ (TOCE) 15(2):8Google Scholar
  11. Competences for Informatics Education in Primary Education (2018) Recommendations. https://www.uni-muenster.de/Grundschulinformatik/bildungsstandards.html. Accessed 2 June 2018
  12. Computer Science Education in Spain 2015 (2016) Report by Google, Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT) and EverisGoogle Scholar
  13. Connolly C (2017) Ireland. Country Report on ICT in Education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  14. Curriculum in South Australian schools (2017) Education and learning, Curriculum and learning. Government of South Australia. https://www.sa.gov.au/topics/education-and-learning/curriculum-and-learning/south-australian-curriculum. Accessed 4 June 2018
  15. Digital Technologies (DT) Australian Curriculum (2017) Governement of western Australia School Curriculum and Standards Authority. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/digital-technologies/. Accessed May 2018
  16. Ethiopia (ICT) Policy and Strategy (2016) The National Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Policy and Strategy. http://www.mcit.gov.et/documents/20181/22562/The+National+Information+and++Communication+Technology++%28ICT%29+Policy+and+Strategy/45d74e1f-6eff-4607-bba9-342462a7be13. Accessed 07 June 2018
  17. Esposito F, Ghezzi C, Hermenegildo M, Kirchner H, Ong L (2018) Informatics research evaluation. An informatics Europe report.  https://www.informatics-europe.org/news/436-research_evaluation.html. Accessed April 2018
  18. Falkner K, Vivian R, Falkner N (2014) The Australian digital technologies curriculum: challenge and opportunity. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth Australasian computing education conference-Volume 148. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  19. Fernández JS (2015) Spain. Country Report on ICT in Education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  20. Finnish National Board of Education (2016) New national core curriculum for basic education: focus on school culture and integrative approach. http://oph.fi/download/174038_new_national_core_curriculum_for_basic_education_focus_on_school_culture_and.pdf. Accessed 04 June 2018
  21. Guerra V, Kuhnt B, Blöchliger I (2012) Informatics at school-worldwide. In: An international exploratory study about informatics as a subject at different school levels. Haslerstiftung. University of ZurichGoogle Scholar
  22. Informatics Education in Europe: Are We All In The Same Boat? (2017) The Committee on European Computing Education (CECE). Joint report with ACM EuropeGoogle Scholar
  23. Informatics in Primary Education (2017) Pradinio ugdymo informatikos bendrosios programos metmenys. https://informatika.ugdome.lt/. Accessed 4 June 2018
  24. Ireland Action Plan for Education 2016–2019 (2018) Department of Education and Skills Strategy Statement. https://www.education.ie/en/The-Department/Action-Plan-for-Education-2016-2019/. Accessed 2 June 2018
  25. Italy National plan for Digital Education (2016). http://www.istruzione.it/scuola_digitale/allegati/2016/pnsd_en.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018
  26. Kabátová M, Kalaš I, Tomcsányiová M (2016) Programming in Slovak primary schools. Olympiads in Informatics 10:125–159Google Scholar
  27. Kanemune S, Shirai S, Tani S (2017) Informatics and programming education at primary and secondary schools in Japan. Olympiads Inform 11:143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kemp P (2014) Computing in the national curriculum. A guide for secondary teachers. Computing At SchoolGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimmo K (2017) Finland. Country Report on ICT in Education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  30. Kind A (2015) Computing attitudes: will teaching 2nd grade students computer science improve their self-efficacy and attitude and eliminate gender gaps. Computer science and self-efficacy. Rising Tide, vol 8, pp. 1–34Google Scholar
  31. Kuno Y, Wada BT., Nakayama Y, Tatsumi T, Uematsu E (2015) K12 IT Education in Japan: current status and future directions, The 23rd IFIP World Computer Congress, IT Education Forum (K-12), pp 37–44Google Scholar
  32. Lehner K (2017) Austria. Country Report on ICT in Education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  33. Mannila L, Dagiene V, Demo B, Grgurina N, Mirolo C, Rolandsson L, Settle A (2014) Computational thinking in K-9 education. In: Proceedings of the working group reports of the 2014 on innovation & technology in computer science education conference. ACM, New York, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  34. Martins de Sousa JM (2017) Portugal. Country Report on ICT in Education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  35. Mavroudi A, Divitini M (2017) Enabling factors and self-efficacy: the case of Norwegian computer science teachers. In: Proceedings of the 6th computer science education research conference. ACM, New York, pp 32–37Google Scholar
  36. Order No. V-598, 25-06-2018 (2018) Įsakymas dėl švietimo ir mokslo ministro 2007 m. Kovo 29 d. Įsakymo nr. Isak-555 „dėl reikalavimų mokytojų kompiuterinio raštingumo programoms patvirtinimo“ pakeitimo 2018 m. birželio 25 d. Nr. V-598. https://www.smm.lt/web/lt/teisesaktai/listing?actual=1. Accessed 4 June 2018
  37. ORDER NO. V-9, 07-01-2016 (2018) Information Technology Mature Exam programme. Informacinių technologijų brandos egzamino programa. Lietuvos Respublikos švietimo ir mokslo ministro 2016 m. sausio 7 d. įsakymo Nr. V-9 redakcija. http://www.nec.lt/failai/5817_IT_BE_programa_patvirtinta_2016_m_sausio_7_d.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018
  38. Overview of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) – Japan (2016). http://www.mext.go.jp/en/about/pablication/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/02/15/1374478_001.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018
  39. Passey D (2017) Computer science (CS) in the compulsory education curriculum: implications for future research. Educ Inf Technol 22(2):421–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Røkenes FM, Krumsvik RJ (2016) Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Comput Educ 97:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shailaja J, Sridaran R (2015) Computational thinking the intellectual thinking for the 21st century. Int J Adv Netw Appl, Special Issue:39–46Google Scholar
  42. Søby M (2018) Norway. Country report on ICT in education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  43. Spieler B, Schindler C, Slany W, Mashkina O (2017) App Creation in Schools for different Curricula Subjects - Lessons Learned, In Proceedings 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Edulearn17), 3–5. Barcelona, Spain, p. 5814–5824Google Scholar
  44. Sysło MM, Kwiatkowska AB (2015) Introducing a new computer science curriculum for all school levels in Poland. In: International conference on informatics in schools: situation, evolution, and perspectives. Springer, Cham, pp 141–154Google Scholar
  45. Terrades N, Chibani E (2018) France. Country report on ICT in education. European SchoolnetGoogle Scholar
  46. The Royal Society (2017) After the reboot: computing education in UK schools. Royal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Verger A (2014) Why do policy-makers adopt global education policies? Toward a research framework on the varying role of ideas in education reform. Curr Issues Comp Edu 16(2):14–29Google Scholar
  48. Victorian Curriculum (2017) Victorian curriculum and assessment authority. http://www.victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/overview/about. Accessed 4 June 2018
  49. Vuorikari R, Punie Y, Gomez SC, Van Den Brande G (2016) DigComp 2.0: the digital competence framework for citizens. Update Phase 1: the conceptual reference model no. JRC101254. Joint Research Centre, SevilleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Data Science and Digital TechnologiesVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Centre for Technology Enhanced Learning, Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Don Passey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK