Skip to main content

Distributed Collaboration in Project-Based Learning and Its Assessment in Next-Generation Learning Environments

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 42 Accesses

Introduction

Distributed Collaboration in Project-Based Learning and Its AssessmentAdvances in technology historically have altered the ability of individuals to communicate with and to collaborate with one another (Hollingshead et al. 1993; Walther et al. 2015; Liao et al. 2018). The implications and opportunities for education have been and will continue to be profound (Collins and Halverson 2018). This entry introduces the nascent area of IT-mediated collaborative learning activities that focus on creating a product or an artifact and that involve virtual teams of individuals who work together, both synchronously and asynchronously, from geographically distinct locations (Hamilton 2018; Hamilton and Owens 2018; Lee et al. 2019). While contemporary society is accustomed to the anywhere/anytime nature of Internet-mediated communication, formal and informal education models have not yet substantially incorporated research-based approaches to virtual, project-based collaboration in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsharo M, Gregg D, Ramirez R (2017) Virtual team effectiveness: the role of knowledge sharing and trust. Inf Manag 54(4):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab S, Dede C (2007) Games and immersive participatory simulations for science education: an emerging type of curricula. J Sci Educ Technol 16(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab S, Thomas M, Dodge T, Carteaux R, Tuzun H (2005) Making learning fun: quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educ Technol Res Dev 1:86–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua RYJ, Morris MW, Mor S (2012) Collaborating across cultures: cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 118(2):116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Halverson R (2018) Rethinking education in the age of technology: the digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crippen K, Earl B (2007) The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Comput Educ 49(3):809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede C (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 323(5910):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg P, Tchounikine P (2007) Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. J Comput Assist Learn 23(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg P, Järvelä S, Fischer F (2009) The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In: Balacheff N, Ludvigsen S, de Jong T, Lazonder A, Barnes S (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning. Springer, Dordrech

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy M (2014) Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends 58(1):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagan B, Hamilton E (2018) Epistemic network analysis of an international digital makerspace in Africa, Europe, and the US. Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem F, Ozen J (2003) Cognitive and affective dimensions of trust in developing team performance. Team Perform Manag Int J 9(5/6):131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Failer JL, Harvey A, Hochschild J (1993) Only one oar in the water: the political failure of school desegregation in Yonkers, New York. Educ Policy 7(3):276–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F, Kollar I, Mandl H, Haake JM (2007) Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F, Kollar I, Stegmann K, Wecker C (2013) Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educ Psychol 48(1):56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontichiaro K (2016) Sustaining a makerspace. Teach Libr 43(4):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard L, Matuk C, McElhaney K, Linn MC (2015) Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education. Educ Res Rev 15:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno JG (2016) Cultural-historical activity theory/design-based research in Pasteur’s quadrant. J Learn Sci 25(4):634–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald S, Kulik A, Kunert A, Beck S, Frohlich B, Cobb S, Parsons S, Newbutt N, Gouveia C, Cook C (2017) Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality. Paper presented at Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton E (2012) SAVI: Finland-USA EAGER: Innovations in Learning and Education. NSF Award 1254189. Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton E (2015) Advancing a complex systems approach to personalized learning communities: bandwidth, sightlines, and teacher generativity. J Interact Learn Res 26(1):89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton E (2018) Synthesis and design workshop: distributed collaboration in STEM-rich project-based learning. National Science Foundation Award DRL-1824924

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton E, Culp K (2016) Research on an international network for STEM Media Making and Student-led Participatory Teaching. National Science Foundation Award DRL-161284 (Advancing Informal STEM Learning (AISL) Program). Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton E, Owens AM (2018) Computational thinking and participatory teaching as pathways to personalized learning. Digital technologies and instructional design for personalized learning. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. pp 212–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton E, Foeaman G, Foeaman L, Ramirez-Gamez I (2016) A cyberensemble of inversion, immersion, shared knowledge areas, query and digital media-making in STEM classrooms. Revolutionizing education with digital ink. T. Hammond, Springer International Publishing, pp 191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy S, Murphy P (1999) The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. Int J Technol Des Educ 9(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse F, Care E, Buder J, Sassenberg K, Griffin P (2015) A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In: Griffin P, Care E (eds) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: methods and approach. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver CE (2016) Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: how to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? AU – Jeong, Heisawn. Educ Psychol 51(2):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead AB, McGrath JE, O’Connor KM (1993) Group task performance and communication technology: a longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Res 24(3):307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme JJ, Wells AS, Revilla AT (2005) Learning through experience: what graduates gained by attending desegregated high schools. Equity Excell Educ 38(1):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immordino-Yang MH, Damasio A (2007) We feel, therefore we learn: the relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind Brain Educ 1(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä S, Kirschner PA, Panadero E, Malmberg J, Phielix C, Jaspers J, Koivuniemi M, Järvenoja H (2015) Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educ Technol Res Dev 63(1):125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeevan S, Townsend J (2015) Forging a new deal in education. Stanford Social Innovation Review. ssir.org/articles/entry/forging_a_new_deal_in_education. Accessed 17 Aug 2015

  • Jeong H, Hmelo-Silver CE (2016) Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: how to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educ Psychol 51(2):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallunki V, Hamilton E (2017) Analysis of Finnish and international students participating an international digital makerspace community. Paper presented in MEC 2017 conference, Under the Northern Lights. H. Rokamo. Rovaniemi

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann TD (1996) CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Vermeulen M (2013) Social aspects of CSCL environments: a research framework. Educ Psychol 48(4):229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Espino D, Hamilton E (2019) Exploratory research application of epistemic network analysis for examining international virtual collaborative STEM learning. American Educational Research Association, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Gui X, Manquen M, Hamilton E (2019) Use of training, validation, and test sets for developing automated classifiers in quantitative ethnography. In: Shaffer DW, Eagan B (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference for quantitative ethnography. Springer, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen T, Durall E, Kuikkaniemi K, Mikkonen T, Nelimarkka M, Syvänen A, Toikkanen T (2014) Design for learning: enhancing participation in learning through design thinking. In: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao W, Bazarova NN, Yuan YC (2018) Unpacking medium effects on social psychological processes in computer-mediated communication using the social relations model. J Comput-Mediat Commun 23(2): 90–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka J, King A, Bennett KB (2013) Solving problems with design thinking: 10 stories of what works. Columbia Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren R (2009) Perspective-based learning in virtual environments. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney J, Resnick M, Rusk N, Silverman B, Eastmond E (2010) The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Trans Comput Educ 10(4):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marope M (2017) Reconceptualizing and repositioning curriculum in the 21st century: a global paradigm shift. Retrieved 22 Apr 2018 from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/news/document-reconceptualizing-and-repositioning-curriculum-21st-century

  • McKeown J, Hmelo-Silver CE, Jeong H, Hartley K, Faulkner R, Emmanuel N (2017) A meta-synthesis of CSCL literature in STEM education. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell N (2009) Learning through self-explanation of mathematics examples: effects of cognitive load. Education resource information clearinghouse (ERIC). Number ID: ED372095

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller S, Kapadia M, Frey S, Klinger S, Mann RP, Solenthaler B, Sumner RW, Gross M (2015) HeapCraft social tools: understanding and improving player collaboration in minecraft. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the foundations of digital games (FDG 2015). Foundations of Digital Games 2015:22–25. Pacific Grove, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Multisilta J (2014) Mobile panoramic video applications for learning. Educ Inf Technol 19(3):655–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer DJ, Gerber HR (2015) Maker culture and minecraft: implications for the future of learning. Educ Media Int 52(3):216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi H, Multisilta J (2016) Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25(4):451–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokes-Malach TJ, VanLehn K, Belenky DM, Lichtenstein M, Cox G (2013) Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. Eur J Psychol Educ 28(4):1237–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero E, Kirschner PA, Järvelä S, Malmberg J, Järvenoja H (2015) How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: a shared regulation intervention. Small Group Res 46(4): 431–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul AM (2016) The coding revolution. Sci Am 315(2):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola S, Hakkarainen K (2014) Trialogical Approach for Knowledge Creation. In: Tan S, So H, Yeo J (eds) Knowledge Creation in Education. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea R, Lindgren R (2008) Video collaboratories for research and education: an analysis of collaboration design patterns. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 1(4): 235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle J (2013) Special issue on CSCL: discussion. Educ Psychol 48(1):67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouvrais S, Ormrod J, Landrac G, Mallet J, Gilliot JM, Thepaut A, Tremenbert P (2006) A mixed project-based learning framework: preparing and developing student competencies in a French Grande Ecole. Eur J Eng Educ 31(1):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe E, Shernoff D (2014) The Finnish-US Network (FUN): Studying Flow in Educational Games & Gamified Learning Environments in World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer D (2017) Quantitative ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer DW, Svarovsky D, Navoa G, Nash P, Nulty A, Bagley E, Frank K, Rupp AA, Mislevy R (2009) Epistemic network analysis: a prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. Int J Learn Media 1(2):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples M (2015) Seamless learning: using location-aware technology to support art education. Computer 48(11):6–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan K, Halverson ER, Litts B, Brahms L, Jacobs-Priebe L, Owens T (2014) Learning in the making: a comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harv Educ Rev 84(4):505–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soegaard M, Dam RF (2012) The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. In: The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Idea Reference Group, Hershey PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector JM (2014) Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learn Environ 1(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl G, Koschmann T, Suthers D (2006) Computer-supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. In: Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos J-W, Weinberger A (2010) Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput Hum Behav 26(4):491–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers DD (2006) Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: a research agenda for CSCL. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 1(3):315–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasley SD, Roschelle J (1993) Constructing a joint problem space: the computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. Computers as cognitive tools. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 229–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C-W, Shen P-D, Lin R-A (2015) Exploring the effects of student-centered project-based learning with initiation on students’ computing skills: a quasi-experimental study of digital storytelling. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ 11(1):27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden S (2015) Intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Nat Clim Chang 5(7): 612–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Kotze A, Cooper L (2000) Exploring the transformative potential of project-based learning in university adult education. Studies in the Education of Adults 32(2):212–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C (2008) Learning experience with virtual worlds. J Inf Syst Educ 19(3):263–266

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB, Van Der Heide B, Ramirez A Jr, Burgoon JK, Peña J (2015) Interpersonal and hyperpersonal dimensions of computer-mediated communication. In: The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, vol 1. Wiley, Chichester, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Mu J (2017) Introduction to collaboration scripts. Flexible scripting to facilitate knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer, Singapore. pp 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells AS, Holme JJ, Atanda AK, Revilla AT (2005) Tackling racial segregation one policy at a time: why school desegregation only went so far. Teach Coll Rec 107(9):2141–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West KC (1994) A desegregation tool that backfired: magnet schools and classroom segregation. Yale Law J 103(8):2567–2592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson B (2017) Who owns educational theory? Big data, algorithms and the expert power of education data science. E-Learning Digital Media 14(3):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong RMF, Lawson MJ, Keeves J (2002) The effects of self-explanation training on students’ problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learn Instr 12(2):233–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2017) World development report: learning to realize education’s promise. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Hamilton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hamilton, E., Kallunki, V. (2020). Distributed Collaboration in Project-Based Learning and Its Assessment in Next-Generation Learning Environments. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics