Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Ultranet

  • Arthur TatnallEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_50
  • 2 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

Parents of schoolchildren want to be well informed and know as much as possible about their children’s school and how their children are progressing at school. In 2010 the State Government of Victoria, Australia, launched an online system, the Ultranet, for connecting and informing school communities using web-based technology. The Ultranet was launched in 2010 and, after a short life, finally abandoned in June 2013. This entry addresses the socio-technical nature of the Ultranet, its development, and the possibilities it offered and examines why they did not fully eventuate.

The Ultranet was intended to support knowledge sharing across Victorian Government Schools and to be used by over 540,000 students and their parents in 1,555 government schools along with their 40,000 teachers (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010; DEECD 2010b). It was intended to provide facilities for keeping parents informed about their children’s schooling...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) Statistics Victoria, Mar 2010. Retrieved November 2010, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1100.2Main+Features3Mar+2010
  2. Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action & belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 196–229Google Scholar
  3. Callon M (1999) Actor-network theory – the market test. In: Law J, Hassard J (eds) Actor network theory and after. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp 181–195Google Scholar
  4. Davey W, Tatnall A (2012) Using ANT to guide technological adoption: the case of school management software. Int J Actor Netw Theory Technol Innov 4(4):47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davey W, Tatnall A (2013) Social technologies in education: an actor-network analysis. In: Ley T, Ruohonen M, Laanpere M, Tatnall A (eds) Open and social technologies for networked learning. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DEECD (2005) [Technical] Ultranet. Retrieved 30 Jan 2013, from http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/tech/2005-April/000008.html
  7. DEECD (2009) Ultranet coaches 2009 handbook. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  8. DEECD (2010a) Information for parents: introducing the Ultranet to students. DEECD, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  9. DEECD (2010b) Summary statistics for victorian schools. Retrieved November 2010, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/publications/newsinfo/factsandfigures.htm
  10. DEECD (2010c) Ultranet – Students@Centre Trial. Retrieved December 2012, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/programs/learningdev/Pages/ultranettrial.aspx
  11. DEECD (2010d) Ultranet student free day in August. Retrieved 30 Jan 2013, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/news/archive/pages/studentfreeday.aspx
  12. DEECD (2011a) Ultranet. Retrieved January 2012, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/directions/ultranet/default.htm
  13. DEECD (2011b) Ultranet – login to the future. Retrieved January 2012, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/directions/Ultranet/default.htm
  14. DEECD (2012) Ultranet. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/parents/primary/Pages/ultranet.aspx
  15. EduWeb (2006) The Ultranet – research & development Initiative. DEECD. Retrieved from https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/student/04ultranetbkgrd.pdf
  16. Griffin P, Woods K (2006) Evaluation of the pilot implementation of the Student@Centre Ultranet in Victorian Schools. The University of Melbourne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  17. Grint K, Woolgar S (1997) The machine at work – technology, work and organisation. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Holden S (2010) Ultranet crashes. Teacher (214)Google Scholar
  19. Latour B (1988) The prince for machines as well as for machinations. In: Elliott B (ed) Technology and social process. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 20–43Google Scholar
  20. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour B (1996) Aramis or the love of technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Syst Pract 5(4):379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy M (2010). ‘Massive fail’: technical glitches upset Ultranet training day. The Age. Melbourne, The AgeGoogle Scholar
  24. McMaster T, Vidgen RT, Wastell DG (1997) Towards an understanding of technology in transition. Two conflicting theories. In: Information systems research in Scandinavia, IRIS20 conference. University of Oslo, HankoGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharp S (2013) Ultranet future. DEECD mail. DEECD. DEECD, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  26. Tatnall A (2000) Innovation and change in the information systems curriculum of an Australian University: a socio-technical perspective. Doctor of Philosophy, Central Queensland UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. Tatnall A (2009) Information systems, technology adoption and innovation translation. Int J Actor Netw Theory Technol Innov 1(1):59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tatnall A (2011) Information systems research, technological innovation and actor-network theory. Heidelberg Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  29. Tatnall A, Dakich E (2011) Informing parents with the Victorian education Ultranet. Informing Science and IT Education, Novi SadCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tatnall A, Gilding A (1999) Actor-network theory and information systems research. In: Proceedings of the 10th Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS). Victoria University of Wellington, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Tatnall A, Dakich E, Davey W (2011) The Ultranet as a future social network: an actor-network analysis. In: Wickramasinghe N, Lechner U, Pucihar A, Gricar J, Mamnik M (eds) 24th Bled eConference. University of Maribor, Bled, pp 348–360Google Scholar
  32. Tatnall A, Davey W, Dakich E, Wickramasinghe N (2013) The Ultranet: an eGovernment project management failure? In: Lux Wigand D, Carlsson C, Clarke R, Pucihar A, Kljajić Borštnar M (eds) 26th Bled eConference, eInnovations: challenges and impacts for individuals, organizations and society, Bled, pp 32–47Google Scholar
  33. Toomey R, EkinSmyth C, Warner C, Fraser D (2000) Case study of ICT and school improvement at Glen Waverley Secondary College, Victoria, Australia. In: OECD/CERI ICT Program ICT and the Quality of Learning. Glen Waverley Secondary College, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  34. Topsfield J (2010) Rollout of Ultranet postponed. The Age. Melbourne, Fairfax: 5Google Scholar
  35. Victorian Auditor-General’s Office (2012) Learning technologies in government schools. Victorian Auditor-General’s Office, MelbourneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Arthur Tatnall
    • 1
  1. 1.Information SystemsVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia