Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Exploratory Study Using Self-Regulated Self-Development (SRSD) and Technology in the Context of the Classroom

  • Catarina Liane AraújoEmail author
  • António José Osório
  • Ana Paula Loução Martins
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_230

Synonyms

Introduction

The use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the context of writing is increasingly natural, and as a result, this interaction has caused changes in the nature and contexts of communicational processes (interpersonal, virtual, digital, and textual). This use of ICT has also changed the writing process making it more diverse and integrating with new writing formats (e.g., linear, multimodal), which may occur in different contexts (e.g., synchronous or asynchronous, individual, collective, or collaborative), and enforces the integration of digital literacy by the school (Lacina and Griffith 2012).

The integration of technologies in the classroom context is a necessity and a potential for the learning processes involving several teachers and students, with different characteristics, knowledge, and experiences....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a PhD Grant SFRH/BD/86175/2012, which was awarded to Araújo, C.L. by the Technology and Science Foundation (FCT), Portugal, and developed at the Research Center in Education of Institute of Education – University of Minho (Portugal).

References

  1. Akbiyik C, Seferoglu SS (2012) Instructing ICT lessons in primary schools: teachers’ opinions and applications. Educ Sci: Theory Pract 12(1):417–424Google Scholar
  2. Anderson L, Krathwohl DA (2001) Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education Group, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo CL (2017) Dificuldades de Aprendizagens Específicas na escrita de textos argumentativos de opinião: O papel das estratégias de autorregulação no contexto das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação. Dissertação de Doutoramento em Estudos da Criança – área de Educação Especial, Universidade do Minho, Braga. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1822/48602
  4. Berninger VW, Nagy W, Tanomoto S, Thompson R Abbott R (2015) Computer Instruction in Handwriting, Spelling, and Composing for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Grades 4 to 9. Computers & Education 81:154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.005
  5. Boyle JR, Forchelli GA, Cariss K (2015) Note-taking interventions to assist students with disabilities in content area classes. Prev Sch Fail 59(3):186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckingham D (2007) Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the internet. Res Comp Int Educ 2(1):43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CAST (2011) Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines
  8. Cope B, Kalantzis M (2000) Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. Macmillan, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz V (2009) Dificuldades de Aprendizagem Específicas. Lidel, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuban L (2001) Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Culter L, Graham S (2008) Primary grade writing instruction: a national survey. J Educ Psychol 100:907–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Smedt F, Van Keer H (2014) A research synthesis on effective writing instruction in primary education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 112:693–701. Presented at the international conference on education and educational psychology (ICEEPSY)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flewitt R, Flewitt R, Messer D, Kucirkova N (2014) New directions for early literacy in a digital age: the iPad. J Early Child Lit 15(3):289–310.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414533560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuchs D, Fuchs L, Vaughn S (2008) Response to intervention: a framework for reading educators. International Reading Association, NewarkGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham CR (2011) Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Comput Educ 57:1953–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham S, Hall TE (2016) Writing and writing difficulties from primary grades to college: introduction to the special issue. Learn Disabil Q 39(1):3–4.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715592154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham S, Harris KR (2013) Designing an effective writing program. In: Graham S, MacArthur C, Fitzgerald J (eds) Best practices in writing instruction. Guilford, New York, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  18. Graham S, McKeown D, Kiuhara S, Harris KR (2012) A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. J Educ Psychol 104(4):879–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris KR, Graham S, Mason LH, Friedlander B (2008) Powerful writing strategies for all students. Brookes, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  20. Hattie J (2009) Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  21. Kellogg RT (2008) Training writing skills: a cognitive developmental perspective. J Writ Res 1(1):1–26.  https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lacina J, Griffith R (2012) Blogging as a means of crafting writing. Read Teach 66(4):316–320.  https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacArthur CA (2009) Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learn Disabil Res Pract 24(2):93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morphy P, Graham S (2012) Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findings. Read Writ Interdiscip J 25(3):641–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson SS, McClay JK (2012) Assumptions and practices in using digital technologies to teach writing in middle-level classrooms across Canada. Literacy 46:140–146.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00665.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson-Karlan GR (2011) Technology to support writing by students with learning and academic disabilities: recent research trends and findings. Assist Technol Outcomes Benefits 7(1):39–62. ISSN: ISSN-1938-727XGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose D, Meyer A (2002) Teaching every student in the digital age: universal design for learning. ASCD, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  28. Tavares CF, Barbeiro LF (2011) As Implicações das TIC no Ensino da Língua. Ministério da Educação: Direcção-Geral de Inovação e de Desenvolvimento Curricular, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson R, Tanimoto S, Abbott R, Nielsen K, Lyman RD, Geselowitz K, … Berninger V (2016) Relationships between language input and letter output modes in writing notes and summaries for students in grades 4 to 9 with persisting writing disabilities. Assist Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1199066
  30. Troia GA, Shankland RK, Wolbers KA (2012) Motivation research in writing: theoretical and empirical considerations. Read Writ Q 28:5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolf B, Berninger V, Abbott R (2016) Effective beginning handwriting instruction: multimodal, consistent format for 2 years, and linked to spelling and composing. Read Writ 30:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Virginia W. Berninger, William Nagy, Steve Tanimoto, Rob Thompson, Robert D. Abbott, (2015) Computer instruction in handwriting, spelling, and composing for students with specific learning disabilities in grades 4–9. Computers & Education 81:154-168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catarina Liane Araújo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • António José Osório
    • 1
  • Ana Paula Loução Martins
    • 1
  1. 1.Education Research Centre (CIEd), Institute of EducationUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Centre for Psychological Research and Social Intervention (CIS)ISCTE-University Institute of LisbonLisbonPortugal