Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Modeling the Process of Information Technology Innovation in Education

  • Arthur TatnallEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_176
  • 3 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

Change occurs in all forms of education, but particularly in relation to adoption of new information technologies. New ideas, new approaches, and new technologies frequently appear in classrooms at all levels from pre-school to university. This entry looks at the processes by which new technologies in education are adopted and used in the form they were offered, partially adopted, or rejected completely. This process is known as innovation and, rather than involving the creation of new technologies, describes the process of adopting and putting these technologies into practice (Maguire et al. 1994).

To investigate if and how new information technologies are adopted in education, it is useful to consider one of the theories of technological innovation:
  • The linear model of innovation

  • The diffusion of innovations

  • The theory of reasoned action (TRA)

  • Social cognitive...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad Manage Rev (18):487–517Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds) Action-control: from cognition to behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Ajzen I, Madden T (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:453–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonfield E (1974) Attitude, social influence, personal norm and intentions as related to brand purchase behavior. J Mark Res 11:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callon M (1986a) The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Macmillan Press, London, pp 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callon M (1986b) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action & belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 196–229Google Scholar
  10. Davis F (1986) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctor of Philosophy, MIT, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):318–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis FD, Venkatesh V (2004) Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51(1):31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  15. Godin B (2006) The linear model of innovation: the historical construction of an analytical framework. Sci Technol Hum Values 31:639–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrell G, Bennett P (1974) An evaluation of the expectancy value model of attitude measurement for physician prescribing behavior. J Mark Res 11(3):269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kripanont N (2007) Examining a technology acceptance model of internet usage by academics within Thai business schools. Doctor of Philosophy, Victoria University, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  18. Latour B (1986) The powers of association. In: Law J (ed) Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Sociological review monograph 32. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 264–280Google Scholar
  19. Latour B (1996) Aramis or the love of technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Law J (1987) Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 111–134Google Scholar
  21. Maguire C, Kazlauskas EJ, Weir AD (1994) Information services for innovative organizations. Academic, San DiegoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore G, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2(3):192–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers EM, Daley H, Wu T (1980) The Diffusion of personal computers. Retrieved from Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Tatnall A (2005) Modelling technological change in small business. In: Khosrow-Pour M (ed) Encyclopaedia of information science and technology. Idea Group Reference, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  27. Tatnall A (2007) Innovation translation in a university curriculum. Heidelberg Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  28. Tatnall A (2009) Information systems, technology adoption and innovation translation. Int J Actor Netw Theory Tech Innov 1(1):59–74.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jantti.2009010104
  29. Tatnall A (2011) Information systems research, technological innovation and actor-network theory. Heidelberg Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  30. Tatnall A, Davey W (2003) Modelling the adoption of web-based mobile learning – an innovation translation approach. In: Zhou W, Nicholson P, Corbitt B, Fong J (eds) Advances in web-based learning, vol LNCS 2783. Springer, Berlin, pp 433–441Google Scholar
  31. Taylor S, Todd P (1995a) Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q 19(4):561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor S, Todd P (1995b) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 6(2):144–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Venkatesh V, Davis F (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warshaw P, Davis F (1985) Disentangling behavior intention and behavioral expectation. J Exp Soc Psychol 21:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wikipedia (2017) Linear model of innovation. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_model_of_innovation

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Arthur Tatnall
    • 1
  1. 1.Information SystemsVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia