Skip to main content

MOOCs, Teacher Professional Learning and Deep Learning Conversations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 79 Accesses

This entry describes an innovative model of teacher professional learning that has evolved over a decade (2006 to 2016). In particular, it explores how this face-to-face model of professional learning can be successfully reconfigured in an online environment to help scale up the initiative. Designed as a school-focused, job-embedded teacher professional learning framework that meets teachers’ expressed needs, the model helps to shift teachers’ pedagogical orientations and challenge more traditional instructional environments by embedding digital technologies and other elements of twenty-first-century skills into the teaching and learning experience. Building on the experiences of implementing this framework, this entry reports the most recent phase which attempts to harness the emergence of a 4th wave of online learning. This initiative involves the design and development of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) that potentially enables the massive scaling up of access to this already...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Bures EM, Borokhovski E, Tamim RM (2011) Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice. J Comput High Educ 23:82–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ananiadou K, Claro M (2009) 21st century skills and competences for New Millennium learners in OECD countries. Organization for economic cooperation and development. EDU working paper no 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Garrison DR (1998) Learning in a networked world: new roles and responsibilities. In: Gibson C (ed) Learners in higher education. Atwood Publishing, Madison, pp 97–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Avalos B (2011) Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education 27(1):10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji MS, Chakrabarti D (2010) Student interactions in online discussion forum: empirical research from ‘Media richness theory’ perspective. J Interact Online Learn 9(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannan-Ritland B (2002) Computer-mediated communication, elearning and interactivity: a review of the research. Q Rev Dist Learn 3(2):161–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley M, Erstad O, Herman J, Raizen S, Ripley M, Miller-Ricci M, Rumble M (2012) Defining twenty-first century skills. In: Griffin P, McGaw B, Care E (eds) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer, New York, pp 17–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette J (2011) Participant interaction in asynchronous learning environments: evaluating interaction analysis methods. [Online]. Linguist and Education. www.elsevier.com/locate/linged

  • Blayone T, van Oostveen R, Barber W, DiGiuseppe M, Childs E (2017) Democratizing digital learning: theorizing the fully online learning community model. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14(13):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower M, Dalgarno B, Kennedy G, Lee M, Kenney J (2014) Blended synchronous learning handbook. Australian Office for Learning and Teaching. https://blendsync.org/handbook

  • Brookfield S, Preskill S (2005) Discussion as a way of teaching, vol 2. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D (2004) Self-determined teacher learning in a digital context: fundamental change in thinking and practice. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Dublin City University

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Leahy M (2010) Job-embedded professional development: Moving traditional education toward innovation in Ireland. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, Colarado

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Leahy M (2011) Sharing classroom practices: a scalable, sustainable model of teacher professional development for learning in the 21st century. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1788–1794). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Leahy M (2015) Moving towards innovation: the development of a sustainable framework for teacher professional learning. In: Shaping the future: how technology can lead to educational transformation. Liffey Press, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond L (1993) Reframing the school reform agenda: developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan 74(12):752–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond L, Hyler M, Gardner M (2017) Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report

  • DES (2015) Digital strategy for schools – 2015–2020. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/Digital-Strategy-for-Schools-2015-2020.pdf

  • Downes S (2012) Massively open online courses are here to stay, Stephen’s Web, July 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebben M, Murphy JS (2014) Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learn Media Technol 39(3):328–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ETA (European Training Agency) (2010) Key Competences. [Online]. Retrieved May 05 2019 at https://www.etf.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/etf-key-indicators-2010

  • Garrison RD, Cleveland-Innes M (2005) Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: interaction is not enough. Am J Dist Educ 19(3):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JA, Oswald CA, Pomerantz J (2015) Predictors of retention and achievement in a massive open online course. Am Educ Res J 52(5):925–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati S (2004) Constructivism and emerging online learning pedagogy: a discussion for formal to acknowledge and promote the informal. In: Annual conference of the universities association for continuing education – regional futures: formal and informal learning perspectives, Centre for Lifelong Learning, University of Glamorgan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallissy M (2014) Building teacher professionalism in teaching-learning interactions between online tutors and learners during synchronous tutorials – a case study from Hibernia College. EdD, Institute of Education [Online]. https://www.academia.edu/9427758/Building_teacher_professionalism_in_teaching-learning_ interactions_between_online_tutors_and_learners_during_synchronous_tutorials_a_case_study_from_Hibernia_College)

  • Henderikx M, Kreijns K, Kalz M (2017) Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Dist Educ 38(3):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirumi A (2002) Student-centered, technology-rich learning environments (SCenTRLE): Operationalizing constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10(4):497–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges C, Lowenthal P, Grant M (2016) Teacher professional development in the digital age: design considerations for MOOCs for teachers. In: Society for information technology & teacher education international conference, pp 2075–2081. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Savannah, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • ICEF Monitor (2016) MOOC enrolment surpassed 35 million in 2015. http://monitor.icef.com/2016/01/mooc-enrolment-surpassed-35-million-in-2015

  • Jobe W, Östlund C, Svensson L (2014) MOOCs for professional teacher development. In: Society for information technology & teacher education international conference, 17 March 2014 in Jacksonville, AACE, pp 1580–1586

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard D (2002) Rethinking University Teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2nd edn. Routledge Falmer, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard D (2016) The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Res Learn Technol. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369

  • Law N, Chow A (2008) Pedagogical orientation in mathematics and science and the use of ICT. In: Law N, Pelgrum J, Plomp T (eds) Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. The Comparative Education Research Centre, Hong Kong

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J, Tar U (2018) Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educ Media Int 55(1):79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin F, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Bunhrani K (2018) Systematic review of two decades (1995–2014) of research on synchronous online learning. Am J Dist Educ 31(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra PK (2018) MOOCs for teacher professional development: reflections and suggested actions. Open Praxis 10(1):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Foundation for the Improvement of Education (1996) Teachers take charge of learning: transferring professional development for student success. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED401251.pdf

  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment) (2009) Senior cycle key skills framework. Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2005) The definition and selection of key competencies. Paris: Author. Retrieved May 05 2019 at http://www.oecd.org/document/17/0,3343,en_2649_39263238_2669073_1_1_1_1,00.html

  • Picciano A (2014) A critical reflection of the current research in online and blended learning. ELM magazine, theme issue, issue 4/2014. http://www.elmmagazine.eu/articles/a-critical-reflection-of-the-current-research-in-online-and-blended-learning

  • Rovai AP (2004) A constructivist approach to online college learning. Internet High Educ 7(2):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon G (2000) E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. Kogan Pagan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear L, Means B, Gorges T, Toyama Y, Gallagher L, Estrella G, Lundh P (2009) The Microsoft Innovative Schools Program year 1 evaluation report. Microsoft, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear L, Gallagher L, Patel D (2011) ITL research: evolving educational ecosystems. Microsoft, Redmond

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavredes T (2011) Effective online teaching: foundations and strategies for student success. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian R, Falkner K, Falkner N (2014) Addressing the challenges of a new digital technologies curriculum: MOOCs as a scalable solution for teacher professional development. Res Learn Technol 22(1):24691

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1980) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warren Little J (2003) Inside teacher community: representations of classroom practice. Teach Coll Rec 105(6):913–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deirdre Butler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Butler, D., Leahy, M., Hallissy, M., Brown, M. (2020). MOOCs, Teacher Professional Learning and Deep Learning Conversations. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_166

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics