Introduction
Recently the World Bank reported that out of the 1 billion population (15% of world’s population) experiencing some form of disability such as one-fifth of the estimated global total, or between 110 and 190 million people experience significant disability (WHO 2018). Technology plays a vital role for Inclusion as it increases the participation of individual and community at large in all walks of life. Various revolutionary innovations such as artificial limbs, robotic assistance for feeding, Speech Generating Device (SGD), etc. enables individuals with disabilities more functional capacities.
In general, definition of assistive technology comes from the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, which was amended in 2004. The amendment defined assistive technology as “any item, a piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized that is used to increase, maintain or improve functional capabilities of individuals with...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aarts E (2006) True visions: the emergence of ambient intelligence. Springer, Berlin, p 37
Ahmed D (2015) Rights of persons with disability in India- A critical legal analysis, Chandigarh: White Falcon Publishing
Carmien S (2016) Assistive technology design for intelligence augmentation. Synth Lect Assist Rehabil Health Preserv Technol 5(2):i-171. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00709ed1v01y201603arh010
Cook AM, Polgar JM (2014) Assistive technologies: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis
de Vries MJ (2010a) Engineering science as a “discipline of the particular”? Types of generalization in engineering sciences. In: van de Poel I, Goldberg DE (eds) Philosophy and engineering: an emerging agenda. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 83–94
de Vries MJ (2010b) Introducing Van Riessen’s work in the philosophy of technology. Philos Reformata 75(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000478
Hayhoe S (2014) An enquiry into passive and active exclusion from unreachable artworks in the museum: two case studies of final-year students at California School for the Blind studying artworks through galleries and on the web. Br J Vis Impair 32(1):44–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619613514238
Hayhoe, Simon (2014) Reducing passive cultural exclusion of people with disabilities, an epistemological approach. In: The Second Annual Fulbright Scholars’ Research Symposium, 2014-05-19
Jones ML (2002) Human factors and environmental access. In: Olson DA, DeRuyter F (eds) Clinician’s guide to assistive technology. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 41–53
King TW (1999) Assistive technology: essential human factors. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights
Krug (2006) Don’t make me think. Pearson India
Krüger S, Berberian A (2014) Augmentative and alternative communication system (AAC) for social inclusion of people with complex communication needs in the industry. Assist Technol 27(2):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2014.984261
Lee H, Johnson C (2017) Perspectives of teachers on the use of assistive technology with students with disabilities. J Spec Educ Rehabil Sci 56(4):357–377. https://doi.org/10.23944/jsers.2017.12.56.4.16
Logemann J (2000) What is evidence-based practice and why should we care? ASHA Leader 5(5):3
Malcolm M, Roll M (2016) The impact of assistive technology services in post-secondary education for students with disabilities: intervention outcomes, use-profiles, and user-experiences. Assist Technol 29(2):91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1214932
Malcolm M, Roll M (2017) Self-reported assistive technology outcomes and personal characteristics in college students with less-apparent disabilities. Assist Technol:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1406414
McDonnell JJ, Hardman ML, McDonnell AP (2003) An introduction to persons with moderate and severe disabilities: Emotional and social issues, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Boston
Meijers AWM (2000) The relational ontology of technical artefacts. In: Kroes PA, Meijers AWM (eds) The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 81–96
Mitcham C (1994) Thinking through technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Quist RW, Lloyd LL (1997) Principles and uses of technology. In: Lloyd LL, Fuller DR, Arvidson HH (eds) Augmentative and alternative communication: a handbook of principles and practices. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, pp 107–126
Schlosser RW (2003) The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: toward evidence-based practice. Academic, San Diego
Schlosser RW, Raghavendra P (2004) Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 20(1):1–21
Schlosser R, Sigafoos J (2009) Navigating evidence-based information sources in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 25(4):225–235. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434610903360649
Shaffer R (2017) Cognitive load and issue engagement in congressional discourse. Cogn Syst Res 44:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.03.006
Simon H (2014) The need for inclusive accessible technologies for students with disabilities and learning difficulties. In: Burke L (ed) Learning in a digitalized age: plugged in, turned on, totally engaged? John Catt Educational Publishing, Melton, pp 257–274
The Center for Universal Design (1997) The principles of universal design, version 2.0. North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Thistle J, Wilkinson K (2015) Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: current practices and future directions. Augment Altern Commun 31(2):124–136. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1035798
Van Riessen H (1938) Philosophie der techniek. Philos Reformata 3(4):202–223. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000666
WHO | World report on disability (2018) Who.int. Retrieved 1 Mar 2018, from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/
Yu Y, Liang W (2013) Manipulability inclusive principle for hip joint assistive mechanism design optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(5–8):929–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5323-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Saha, S., Halder, S. (2020). Assistive Technology and Inclusion, Philosophical Foundation. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_142
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_142
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10575-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10576-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceReference Module Computer Science and Engineering