Skip to main content

Assistive Technology and Inclusion, Philosophical Foundation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 63 Accesses

Introduction

Recently the World Bank reported that out of the 1 billion population (15% of world’s population) experiencing some form of disability such as one-fifth of the estimated global total, or between 110 and 190 million people experience significant disability (WHO 2018). Technology plays a vital role for Inclusion as it increases the participation of individual and community at large in all walks of life. Various revolutionary innovations such as artificial limbs, robotic assistance for feeding, Speech Generating Device (SGD), etc. enables individuals with disabilities more functional capacities.

In general, definition of assistive technology comes from the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, which was amended in 2004. The amendment defined assistive technology as “any item, a piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized that is used to increase, maintain or improve functional capabilities of individuals with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts E (2006) True visions: the emergence of ambient intelligence. Springer, Berlin, p 37

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed D (2015) Rights of persons with disability in India- A critical legal analysis, Chandigarh: White Falcon Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmien S (2016) Assistive technology design for intelligence augmentation. Synth Lect Assist Rehabil Health Preserv Technol 5(2):i-171. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00709ed1v01y201603arh010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook AM, Polgar JM (2014) Assistive technologies: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries MJ (2010a) Engineering science as a “discipline of the particular”? Types of generalization in engineering sciences. In: van de Poel I, Goldberg DE (eds) Philosophy and engineering: an emerging agenda. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries MJ (2010b) Introducing Van Riessen’s work in the philosophy of technology. Philos Reformata 75(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe S (2014) An enquiry into passive and active exclusion from unreachable artworks in the museum: two case studies of final-year students at California School for the Blind studying artworks through galleries and on the web. Br J Vis Impair 32(1):44–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619613514238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, Simon (2014) Reducing passive cultural exclusion of people with disabilities, an epistemological approach. In: The Second Annual Fulbright Scholars’ Research Symposium, 2014-05-19

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones ML (2002) Human factors and environmental access. In: Olson DA, DeRuyter F (eds) Clinician’s guide to assistive technology. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • King TW (1999) Assistive technology: essential human factors. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug (2006) Don’t make me think. Pearson India

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger S, Berberian A (2014) Augmentative and alternative communication system (AAC) for social inclusion of people with complex communication needs in the industry. Assist Technol 27(2):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2014.984261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Johnson C (2017) Perspectives of teachers on the use of assistive technology with students with disabilities. J Spec Educ Rehabil Sci 56(4):357–377. https://doi.org/10.23944/jsers.2017.12.56.4.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logemann J (2000) What is evidence-based practice and why should we care? ASHA Leader 5(5):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm M, Roll M (2016) The impact of assistive technology services in post-secondary education for students with disabilities: intervention outcomes, use-profiles, and user-experiences. Assist Technol 29(2):91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1214932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm M, Roll M (2017) Self-reported assistive technology outcomes and personal characteristics in college students with less-apparent disabilities. Assist Technol:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1406414

  • McDonnell JJ, Hardman ML, McDonnell AP (2003) An introduction to persons with moderate and severe disabilities: Emotional and social issues, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers AWM (2000) The relational ontology of technical artefacts. In: Kroes PA, Meijers AWM (eds) The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham C (1994) Thinking through technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist RW, Lloyd LL (1997) Principles and uses of technology. In: Lloyd LL, Fuller DR, Arvidson HH (eds) Augmentative and alternative communication: a handbook of principles and practices. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, pp 107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser RW (2003) The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: toward evidence-based practice. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser RW, Raghavendra P (2004) Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 20(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser R, Sigafoos J (2009) Navigating evidence-based information sources in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 25(4):225–235. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434610903360649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer R (2017) Cognitive load and issue engagement in congressional discourse. Cogn Syst Res 44:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (2014) The need for inclusive accessible technologies for students with disabilities and learning difficulties. In: Burke L (ed) Learning in a digitalized age: plugged in, turned on, totally engaged? John Catt Educational Publishing, Melton, pp 257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • The Center for Universal Design (1997) The principles of universal design, version 2.0. North Carolina State University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistle J, Wilkinson K (2015) Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: current practices and future directions. Augment Altern Commun 31(2):124–136. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1035798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riessen H (1938) Philosophie der techniek. Philos Reformata 3(4):202–223. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO | World report on disability (2018) Who.int. Retrieved 1 Mar 2018, from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/

  • Yu Y, Liang W (2013) Manipulability inclusive principle for hip joint assistive mechanism design optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(5–8):929–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5323-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santoshi Halder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Saha, S., Halder, S. (2020). Assistive Technology and Inclusion, Philosophical Foundation. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_142

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics