Content and Language Integrated Learning in Hong Kong

  • Yuen Yi LoEmail author
  • Angel M. Y. Lin
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) is characterized by using students’ additional language (L2) as the medium of instruction of non-language content subjects. In recent decades, this type of program has been gaining worldwide popularity, especially in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) contexts, because of the assumption that it can facilitate L2 learning. However, this assumption may not be realized in many classrooms in EFL contexts, where both teachers and students are often not well-prepared to cope with the heavy linguistic demands to learn content and language simultaneously. Owing to a combination of sociopolitical and socioeconomic forces, Hong Kong has a rather long history of practicing some form of CLIL in secondary schools, in the form of English-medium instruction (EMI) education. Following some recent changes in the government’s medium of instruction policies, there are different models and practices of EMI in Hong Kong schools to accommodate students with different English proficiency levels and also the expectations of different stakeholders. This chapter will illustrate these different models and practices and discuss their implications and challenges for English language learning, content learning, and teacher education.


Content and language integrated learning Bilingual education Academic literacies Teacher professional development Language across the curriculum Teacher collaboration 


  1. Andrews SJ, Lin AMY (2018) Language awareness and teacher development. In: Garrett P, Cots JM (eds) The Routledge handbook of language awareness. Routledge, Oxford, pp 57–74Google Scholar
  2. Arkoudis S (2003) Teaching English as a second language in science classes: incommensurate epistemologies? Lang Educ 17(3):161–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baecher L, Farnsworth T, Ediger A (2014) The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Lang Teach Res 18(1):118–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G (2008) Content knowledge for teaching. J Teach Educ 59(5):389–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertaux P, Coonan CM, Frigols-Martín MJ, Mehisto P (2010) The CLIL teacher’s competences grid. Available at Accessed 1 Feb 2017
  6. Borg S (2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Lang Teach 36(2):81–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruton AS (2013) CLIL: some of the reasons why … and why not. System 41(3):587–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammarata L (2016) Foreign language education and the development of inquiry-driven language programs: key challenges and curricular planning strategies. In: Cammarata L (ed) Content-based foreign language teaching: curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills. Routledge/Taylor Francis, New York, pp 123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cammarata L, Haley C (2018) Integrated content, language, and literacy instruction in a Canadian French immersion context: a professional development journey. Int J Biling Educ Biling 21(3):332–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cammarata L, Tedick D (2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: the experience of immersion teachers. Mod Lang J 96(2):251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan JYH (2014) Fine-tuning language policy in Hong Kong education: stakeholders’ perceptions, practices and challenges. Lang Educ 28(5):459–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi PK (2003) The best students will learn English: ultra-utilitarianism and linguistic imperialism in education in post-1997 Hong Kong. J Educ Policy 18(6):673–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen AD (1994) The language used to perform cognitive operations during full- immersion maths tasks. Lang Test 11(2):171–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D (2010) Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Creese A (2005) Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual classrooms. Multilingual Matters, ClevedonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Creese A (2010) Content-focused classrooms and learning English: how teachers collaborate. Theory Pract 49(2):99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crow GM, Pounder DG (2000) Interdisciplinary teacher teams: context, design, and process. Educ Adm Q 36(2):216–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cummins J (2000) Language, power, and pedagogy: bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
  19. Dalton-Puffer C (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Eur J Appl Linguis 1(2):216–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davison C (2006) Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: how do we know when we are doing it right? Int J Biling Educ Biling 9(4):454–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Graaff R, Koopman GJ, Anikina Y, Westhoff G (2007) An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Int J Biling Educ Biling 10(5):603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Education Bureau (2010a) Enriching our language environment, realising our vision. Education Bureau, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  23. Education Bureau (2010b) Circular Memorandum No. 139/2010. Available at Accessed 13 Jan 2010
  24. Education Commission (2005) Report on review of medium of instruction for secondary schools and secondary school places allocation. Government Printer, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  25. Education Department (1994) Research on change of medium of instruction in secondary schools. Government Printer, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  26. Escobar Urmeneta C (2013) Learning to become a CLIL teacher: teaching, reflection and professional development. Int J Biling Educ Biling 16(3):334–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gablasova D (2014) Issues in the assessment of bilingually educated students: expressing subject knowledge through L1 and L2. Lang Learn J 42(2):151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Genesee F, Lindholm-Leary K (2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. J Immers Content Based Lang Educ 1(1):3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Genesee F (2004) What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students? In: Bhatia TK, Ritchie W (eds) Handbook of bilingualism and multiculturalism. Blackwell, Malden, pp 547–576Google Scholar
  30. Georgiou S (2012) Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT J 66(4):495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guskey TR (2002) Professional development and teacher change. Teach Teach Theory Pract 8(3/4):381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harmer J (2015) The practice of English language teaching, 5th edn. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  33. He P, Lin AMY (2018) Becoming a ‘language-aware’ content teacher: content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teacher professional development as a collaborative, dynamic, dialogic process. J Immers Cont Based Educ 6(2):162–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ho KK (1985) The paradox of immersion in a second language. NABE J 10:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoare P (2003) Effective teaching of science through English in Hong Kong secondary schools. Dissertation, The University of Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  36. Kan V, Lai KC, Kirkpatrick A, Law A (2011) Fine-tuning Hong Kong’s medium of instruction policy. Strategic Planning Office and Research Centre into Language Education and Acquisition in Multilingual Societies, Institute of Education, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  37. Koopman GJ, Skeet J, de Graaff R (2014) Exploring content teachers’ knowledge of language pedagogy: a report on a small-scale research project in a Dutch CLIL context. Lang Learn J 42(2):123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krashen S (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Li DCS (2017) Multilingual Hong Kong: languages, literacies and identities. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin AMY (2006) Beyond linguistic purism in language-in-education policy and practice: exploring bilingual pedagogies in a Hong Kong Science classroom. Lang Educ 20(4):287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin AMY (2016) Language across the curriculum and CLIL in English-as-an-additional-language (EAL) contexts: theory and practice. Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lin AMY, He P (2017) Translanguaging as dynamic activity flows in CLIL classrooms. J Lang Identity Educ 16(4):228–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin AMY, Man EYF (2009) Bilingual education: Southeast Asian perspectives. Hong Kong University Press, Hong KongCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindahl KM, Watkins NM (2015) Creating a culture of language awareness in content-based contexts. TESOL J 6(4):777–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Little JW (1990) The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teach Coll Rec 91:509–536Google Scholar
  46. Lo LF (1991) Academic achievement, medium of instruction and teacher characteristics. New Horiz: J Educ 32:18–26Google Scholar
  47. Lo YY (2014) Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC J 45(2):181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lo YY (2015) A glimpse into the effectiveness of L2-content cross-curricular collaboration in content-based instruction programmes. Int J Biling Educ Biling 18(4):443–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lo YY (2017) Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: does professional development help? Int J Biling Educ Biling.
  50. Lo YY (forthcoming) Professional development of CLIL teachersGoogle Scholar
  51. Lo YY, Lo ESC (2014) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Rev Educ Res 84(1):47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Long MH (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie W, Bhatia T (eds) Handbook of second language acquisition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 413–468Google Scholar
  53. Luk J, Lin A (2015) Voices without words: doing critical literate talk in English as a second language. TESOL Q 49(1):67–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lyster R (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: a counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lyster R (2016) Vers une approche intégrée en immersion. Les Éditions CEC, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  56. Lyster R, Ruiz de Zarobe Y (2017) Introduction: instructional practices and teacher development in CLIL and immersion school settings. Int J Biling Educ Biling 21(3):273–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Kong CK (2000) Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: achievement growth in language and nonlanguage subjects. Harv Educ Rev 70(3):302–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Kong CK (2002) Multilevel causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: influence of language of instruction (English compared with Chinese) for Hong Kong students. Am Educ Res J 39(3):727–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marsh D, Mehisto P, Wolff D, Frigols-Martin M (2010) The European framework for CLIL teacher education. European Centre for Modern Languages (ECML), GrazGoogle Scholar
  60. Morton T (2010) Using a genre-based approach to integrating content and language in CLIL. In: Dalton-Puffer C, Nikula T, Smit U (eds) Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 81–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morton T (2016) Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. J Immers Cont Based Lang Educ 4(2):144–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morton T (2018) Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Int J Biling Educ Biling 21(3):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morton T, Llinares A (2017) Content and language integrated learning: type of programme or pedagogical model? In: Llinares A, Morton T (eds) Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  64. Musanti SI, Pence L (2010) Collaboration and teacher development: unpacking resistance, constructing knowledge, and navigating identities. Teach Educ Q 37:73–78Google Scholar
  65. Nikula T, Dalton-Puffer C, Llinares A, Lorenzo F (2016) More than content and language: the complexity of integration in CLIL and multilingual education. In: Nikula T, Dafouz E, Moore P, Smit U (eds) Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Opfer VD, Pedder DG (2011) Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Rev Educ Res 81(3):376–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pérez-Milans M (2016) Bilingual education in Hong Kong. In: García O, Lin AMY, May S (eds) Bilingual and multilingual education: encyclopedia of language and education, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 207–218Google Scholar
  68. Poon AYK (2010) Language use, language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Curr Issues in Lang Plan 11(1):1–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schleppegrell M (2004) The language of schooling: a functional linguistics perspective. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Short DJ (1994) Expanding middle school horizons: integrating language, culture, and social studies. TESOL Q 28(3):581–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Short DJ (2013) Training and sustaining effective teachers of sheltered instruction. Theory Pract 52(2):118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shulman L (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 57(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Siu PK, Chung SC, Hinton A, Cheng YN, Lo LF, Luk HK, Chung YP (1979) The effects of the medium of instruction on student cognitive development and academic achievement. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  74. Swain M (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In: Cook G, Seidlhofer B (eds) Principle and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 125–144Google Scholar
  75. Tan M (2011) Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Lang Teach Res 15(3):325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Trent J (2010) Teacher identity construction across the curriculum: promoting cross-curriculum collaboration in English-medium schools. Asia Pac J Educ 30(2):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tsang WK (2008) The effect of medium-of-instruction policy on education advancement. Available at Accessed on 15 May 2008
  78. Tsui ABM (2004) Medium of instruction in Hong Kong: one country, two systems, whose language? In: Tollefson JW, Tsui ABM (eds) Medium of instruction policies: which agenda? Whose agenda? Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 97–116Google Scholar
  79. Vollmer HJ (2007) Language across the curriculum: a way towards plurilingualism. In: Martyniuk W (ed) Towards a common European framework of reference for languages of school education. Universität Osnabrück, Krakow, pp 177–192Google Scholar
  80. Wolff D (2012) The European framework for CLIL teacher education. Synergies 8:105–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations