Place Names as Strategic Political Communication: Analysis of Geographic Language in US Presidential Debates, 1976–2012
Televised debates between presidential candidates are expected every 4 years by the U.S. electorate. While it is arguable whether such events are truly debates, millions of potential voters watch them and they can make a significant difference in the outcome of close elections. Further, it is well established that debates play an important role in the democratic process by educating potential voters about their choice of candidates. The purpose of this chapter is to analyze the use of geographic language by presidential candidates during debates. We argue that geographic place names may be deployed as a form of strategic political discourse that communicates a specifically cultivated message about candidates to audiences. For example, candidates may use more foreign place references to emphasize their foreign relations experience, particularly incumbents running for a second term. On the other hand, candidates with limited foreign relations experience may utilize domestic references to tout their knowledge of domestic policy. Another important use of domestic place references is related to the manipulation of perception among selected portions of the electorate. Because of the U.S. Electoral College, swing states are strategically important for winning office. By referencing locations in swing states, candidates try to communicate that they empathize with citizen desires in these strategically important places.
KeywordsPresidential debates Place names Political geography Strategic political communication
- Alderman, D. H. (2008). Place, naming and the interpretation of cultural landscapes. In B. J. Graham & P. Howard (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=438418.Google Scholar
- Bakir, V. (2016). Torture, Intelligence and Sousveillance in the War on Terror: Agenda-Building Struggles. https://nls.ldls.org.uk/welcome.html?ark:/81055/vdc_100029369418.0x000001.
- Balentine, M., Frazier, J., & Webster, G. (2014). Geographic place name use in the 2012 presidential debates. In J. Clark Archer, F. Davidson, E. H. Fouberg, K. C. Martis, R. L. Morrill, F. M. Shelley, R. H. Watrel, & G. R. Webster (Eds.), Atlas of the 2012 elections (pp. 63–66). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Berg, L. D., & Vuolteenaho, J. (Eds.). (2009). Critical Toponymies: The contested politics of place naming. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Commission on Presidential Debates. (2016). Accessed 14 Aug 2016. http://www.debates.org/.
- Dionne Jr, E. J. (2016, April 19). Ted Cruz and the Revenge of New York Values. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/04/19/ted-cruz-and-the-revenge-of-new-york-values/.
- Goodey, B. R. (1969). Messages in space: Some observations on geography and communications. North Dakota Quarterly, 37(2), 34–49.Google Scholar
- Hellweg, S. A., Pfau, M., & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Jamieson, K. H., & Birdsell, D. S. (1990). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10087132.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, George. (2008). The political mind: A cognitive Scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics (Reprint ed.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Lilleker, D. (2006). Key concepts in political communication. London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Manheim, J. B. (1991). All of the people, all the time: Strategic communication and American politics. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- McCammon, S. (2016). Will Cruz’s Distaste For ‘New York Values’ Hurt Him With New York Voters? NPR.org. Accessed 29 July 2016. http://www.npr.org/2016/04/07/473328280/will-cruzs-distaste-for-new-york-values-hurt-him-with-new-york-voters.
- McKinney, M. (2008). Debates. In L. L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political communication (Vol. 2, pp. 160–165). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
- McKinney, M. S., & Carlin, D. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203–234). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2008a). http://www.people-press.org/2008/11/13/high-marks-for-the-campaign-a-high-bar-for-obama/.
- Pew Research Center. (2008b). http://www.people-press.org/2008/10/22/most-voters-say-news-media-wants-obama-to-win/.
- “Presidential Debates – C-SPAN Video Library”. (2016). Accessed 14 Aug 2016. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/topic/PresidentialDebates.
- Saenz, A. (2016, February 2). Cruz Credits Attack on Trump’s ‘NY Values’ in Iowa Win. ABC News. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ted-cruz-credits-attack-donald-trumps-york-values/story?id=36658796.
- Sutherland, C. L., & Webster, G. R. (1994). The geography of the 1992 U.S. presidential debates. The Geographical Bulletin, 36(2), 83–93.Google Scholar
- Varnum, A. (2016). ‘Hope’ Springs Eternal...Or at Least for This Election Year. International Documentary Association. Accessed 10 Apr 2016. http://www.documentary.org/magazine/hope-springs-eternalor-least-election-year.