Advertisement

Participatory Geographic Information System (PGIS): A Discourse Toward a Solution to Traditional GIS Challenges

  • Coli NdzabandzabaEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

The geographic information system (GIS) has influenced, as well as changed the outlook, and shaped the future of many disciplines within and outside the field of earth sciences. However, it has been criticized for its expert-centeredness as well as its inability to accommodate marginalized groups. A more accommodative form of GIS that addresses the needs of the community in relation to access of data and technology while promoting capacity building and bringing together different stakeholders through participatory approaches to achieve a common goal has been established in recent years and has successfully been applied across the globe. Many terms have been used to refer to this form of GIS and have been adopted into the literature, and they all draw back to the term “participatory GIS.” There is no consensus on the proper terminology to be used. For consistency, the term participatory GIS or PGIS will be used in this article; it emerged to address the challenges of the traditional GIS as a system, as a technique, and as a tool and emphasizes the participatory methods used in the production of GIS and the importance of participation as a process that can take many forms. This article does not attempt to discuss the critiques but intends to highlight the various concepts used in literature. It begins with laying a background of participatory geographic information systems, including the history, trends, and discourses. Secondly, it discusses the marginalization-empowerment nexus initially presented by conventional GIS that necessitated the emergence of PGIS. It also examines the approaches, practical applications, and implementation of PGIS. Lastly, it focuses at the future of PGIS based on the challenges and opportunities thereof.

Keywords

Geographic information system (GIS) Marginalization-empowerment nexus Participatory GIS Public participation GIS 

References

  1. Aberley, D., & Sieber, R. (2002). Public participation guiding principles. Presented at URISA: First International PPGIS Conference, July 20–22, 2002, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  2. Barndt, M. (2002). A model for evaluating public participation GIS. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographical information systems (pp. 346–356). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, G. (2012). An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied Geography, 34, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, G., & Webber, D. (2011). Public participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, G., Schebella, M. F., & Weber, D. (2014). Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS – A people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elwood, S. (2002). GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning A, 34, 905–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elwood, S. (2006). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10(5), 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
  14. Harries, T., & Weiner, D. (2003). Linking community participation to geospatial technologies. ARIDLANDS Newsletters No. 53 May/June: Using geospatial technologies to develop participatory tools for natural resources management.Google Scholar
  15. Harrison, C., & Haklay, M. (2010). The potential of public participation geographic information systems in UK environmental planning: Appraisals by active publics. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(6), 841–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2009). Good practices in participatory mapping: A review prepared for the International Fund for Agricultural Development. Rome: IFAD.Google Scholar
  17. Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: Putting people before the technology. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232–245). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Kyem, P. A. K. (2004). Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: The search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kyem, P. A. K. (2006). Finding common ground in land use conflicts using PGIS. Lessons from Ghana. Special Issue of PLA Notes, 54, 36–40.Google Scholar
  20. Kyem, P. A. K., & Saku, J. C. (2009). Web-based GIS and the future of participatory GIS applications within local and indigenous communities. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(7), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCall, M. K., & Minang, P. A. (2005). Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resources management: Claiming community forests in Cameroon. The Geographical Journal, 171(4), 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meredith, T. C., Yetman, G. G., & Frias, G. (2002). Mexican and Canadian case studies of community-based spatial information management for biodiversity conservation. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 205–217). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, A. (1997). Zeroing. In Geographic information systems at work in the community. Redlands: ESRI.Google Scholar
  24. Musungu, K., & Jacobs, D. (2015). A participatory web map service: The case of Theewaterskloof Dam. South African Journal of Geomatics, 4(3), 198–212.  https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v4i3.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nyerges, T., Bamdt, M., & Brooks, K. (1997). Public participation geographic information systems. In Proceedings of Auto-Carto 13, Seattle, WA (pp. 224–223). Bethesda: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.Google Scholar
  26. Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P., & Drew, C. (2002). Data gathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orban-Ferauge, F. (undated 2011). Participatory geographic information systems and land planning: Life experiences for people empowerment and community transformation. Semantic Scholar.Google Scholar
  28. Panek, J. (2013). Geographic information systems in developing countries – What are the ethical issues we need to be aware of? GeoScience Engineering LIX, 2, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quan, J., Oudwater, N., Pender, J., & Martin, A. (2001). GIS and participatory approaches in natural resources research. In Socio-economic Methodologies for natural resources research. Best practice guidelines. Chatham: Natural Resources Institute, The University of Greenwich, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  30. Rambaldi, G., Kyem, A. P. K., McCall, M., & Weiner, D. (2006). Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsai, B. W., Chang, C. Y., Lin, C. C., & Lo, Y. C. (2002). Public participation geographic information system and indigenous society: New partnership of indigenous peoples in Taiwan. Geography Research Forum, 26, 152–163.Google Scholar
  33. Tulloch, D. (2008). Public participation GIS (PPGIS). In K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geographic information science (pp. 352–355). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Tulloch, D. L., & Epstein, E. (2002). Benefits of community MPLIS: Effectiveness and equity. Transactions in GIS, 6, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weiner, D., & Levin, R. (1991). Land and agrarian transition in South Africa. Antipode, 23(1), 92–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiner, D., Warner, T., Harris, T. M., & Levin, R. M. (1995). Apartheid representations in a digital landscape: GIS, remote sensing, and local knowledge in Kiepersol, South Africa. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Water ResearchRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations