Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel Idowu, René Schmidpeter, Nicholas Capaldi, Liangrong Zu, Mara Del Baldo, Rute Abreu

Shareholder Theory/Shareholder Value

  • Maeve O’Connell
  • Anne Marie WardEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_49-1
  • 9 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition/Description

Shareholder theory states that the primary objective of management is to maximize shareholder value. This objective ranks in front of the interests of other corporate stakeholders, such as employees, suppliers, customers, and society. Shareholder theory argues that shareholders are the ultimate owners of a corporate’s assets, and thus, the priority for managers and boards is to protect and grow these assets for the benefit of shareholders. Shareholder theory assumes that shareholders value corporate assets with two measurable metrics, dividends and share price. Therefore, management should make decisions that maximize the combined value of dividends and share price increases. However, shareholder theory fails to consider that shareholders and corporates may have other objectives that are not based on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, X., & Scholtens, B. (2018). The urge to act: A comparison of active and passive socially responsible investment funds in the United States. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1154–1173.Google Scholar
  4. Cioffi, J. W., & Höpner, M. (2006). The political paradox of finance capitalism: Interests, preferences, and center-left party politics in corporate governance reform. Politics and Society, 34(4), 463–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, T. (2015). Changing paradigms in corporate governance: New cycles and new responsibilities. Society and Business Review, 10(3), 306–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, C., & Friedman, H. H. (2016). Maximizing shareholder value: A theory run amok. Journal of Management, 10(4), 45–60.Google Scholar
  7. Dallas, L. L. (2017). Is there hope for change: The evolution of conceptions of good corporate governance. San Diego Law Review, 54, 491.Google Scholar
  8. De Klerk, M., de Villiers, C., & van Staden, C. (2015). The influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure on share prices. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 208–228.Google Scholar
  9. Englander, E., & Kaufman, A. (2004). The end of managerial ideology: From corporate social responsibility to corporate social indifference. Enterprise and Society, 5(3), 404–450.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, p. 17.Google Scholar
  11. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization and the corporate objective function. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, S. Rahman, & B. Husted (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory responsibility and engagement (pp. 65–84). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. KPMG. (2017a). Carrots & sticks: Global trends in sustainability reporting regulation and policy. GRI, United Nations Environment Programme, & Centre for Corporate Governance in Africa. KPMG. https://www.carrotsandsticks.net/. Accessed 9 Mar 2019.
  14. KPMG. (2017b). The KPMG Survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. KPMG. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2017/10/the-kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2019.
  15. Kyriakou, S. (2018, October 3). Advisors may lose clients if they ignore ethical investments. FTAdvisor, Financial Times Limited. https://www.ftadviser.com/investments/2018/10/03/advisers-may-lose-clients-if-they-ignore-ethical-investments/. Accessed 9 Mar 2019.
  16. Letza, S., Kirkbride, J., Sun, X., & Smallman, C. (2008). Corporate governance theorising: Limits, critics and alternatives. International Journal of Law and Management, 50(1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, J., Petty, W., & Wallace, J. (2009). Shareholder value maximization: Is there a role for corporate social responsibility? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 21(2), 110–118.Google Scholar
  18. Miralles-Quiros, M. D. M., Miralles-Quiros, J. L., & Arraiano, I. G. (2017). Are firms that contribute to sustainable development valued by investors? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  19. Pargendler, M. (2016). The corporate governance obsession. Journal of Corporation Law, 41(2), 359.Google Scholar
  20. Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 65–82.Google Scholar
  21. Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Sullivan, R., Martindale, W., Feller, E., & Bordon, A. (2015). Fiduciary Duty for the twenty-first Century. United Nations Global Compact, Finance UNEP Initiative, PRI, Inquiry. https://www.unpri.org/fiduciary-duty/fiduciary-duty-in-the-21st-century/244.article. Accessed 9 Mar 2019.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technological University DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Ulster Business SchoolUlster UniversityNewtownabbeyNorthern Ireland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Carmela Gulluscio
    • 1
  1. 1.Unitelma Sapienza UniversityRomeItaly