Skip to main content

Precautionary Principle

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management
  • 255 Accesses

Synonyms

“Vorsorgeprinzip”

Definition

The Precautionary Principle is an environmental policy principle used in legislation, policy, and risk management. New technologies like climate engineering, genetically modified crops, nanotechnology, or artificial intelligence are often linked to risks, which are difficult to predict. The Precautionary Principle is applied in decision-making about uncertain but plausible threats to human health or the environment, e.g., as a consequence of using new technologies. In situations which lack scientific certainty, it can be challenging to find the right measures to protect human health or the environment from harm. Put simply, the Precautionary Principle states that lack of certainty shall not be a reason to refrain from taking action to tackle a threat. In other words, it says that in a situation of uncertainty, regulatory action might be a good option (even if scientific data are incomplete or controversial). The Precautionary Principle should be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2000). Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52000DC0001. Accessed 20 May 2019.

  • Frisch, M. (2018). Modeling climate policies: The social cost of carbon and uncertainties in climate predictions. In E. A. Lloyd & E. Winsberg (Eds.), Climate modelling (pp. 413–448). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, K., & Parsons, J. D. (2016). Multi-case review of the application of the Precautionary Principle in European Union law and case law. Risk Analysis, 37(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassl, H., & Metz, B. (2013). 14 climate change: Science and the Precautionary Principle. In EEA – European Environment Agency (Ed.), Late lessons from early warnings: Science, precaution, innovation. (EEA Report No 1/2013, pp. 308–346). http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/late-lessons-2. Accessed 20 May 2019.

  • Holdway, A. (2009). Reducing uncertainty: The need to clarify the key elements of the Precautionary Principle. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development. https://consiliencejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2016/10/5-27-1-PB.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In R. K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Core writing team. Geneva: IPCC, 104 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/. Accessed 20 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, S.I. (2004). Institutionalized knowledge challenges in pesticide governance: The end of knowledge and beginning of values in governing globalized environmental issues. In S. A. Ebbin (Ed.), International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics, 4(2), 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., & Ellis, J. (2003). The Precautionary Principle and global chemical risk management: Some insights from the case of persistent organic pollutants. Greener Management International, 41, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariqueo-Russell A. (2017). Rights of nature and the Precautionary Principle. In A. L. Tabios Hillebrecht & M. V. Berros (Eds.), Can nature have rights? Legal and political insights (RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society, Vol. 6, pp. 21–27). München: Rachel Carson Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgera, E. (2017). The ecosystem approach and the Precautionary Principle. In E. Morgera & J. Razzaque (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental law: Biodiversity and nature protection (Elgar Encyclopedia of environmental law series, Vol. III, pp. 70–80). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, J. (2007). Sustainable development, sustainable decisions and the Precautionary Principle. Natural Hazards, 42(3), 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proelss, A. (2016). Principles of EU environmental law: An appraisal. In Y. Nakanishi (Ed.), Contemporary issues in environmental law. Environmental protection in the European Union (Vol. 5, pp. 29–45). Tokyo: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. L., & Fleurke, F. (2013). Climate engineering research: A precautionary response to climate change? (Carbon and Climate Law Review 2/2013; Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 025/2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2340906. Accessed 30 May 2019.

  • Ricci, P. F. (2006). Environmental and health risk assessment and management. Environmental pollution (Vol. 9, pp. 1–38). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin, P., Peterson, M., Ove Hansson, S., Rudén, C., & Juthé, A. (2002). Five charges against the Precautionary Principle. Journal of Risk Research, 5(4), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science for Environment Policy. (2017). The Precautionary Principle: Decision making under uncertainty (Future Brief 18). Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/precautionary_principle_decision_making_under_uncertainty_FB18_en.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2019.

  • Stewart, R. (2002). Environmental regulatory decision making under uncertainty. In T. Swanson (Ed.), An introduction to the law and economics of environmental policy: Issues in institutional design (pp. 71–126). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J. (2013). Risk regulation in Europe assessing the application of the Precautionary Principle (SpringerBriefs in political science, Vol. 3, pp. 39–50). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst, A. (2009). Prevention, precaution, logic and law: The relationship between the Precautionary Principle and the preventative principle in international law and associated questions. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 18(1), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (1992). Rio declaration on environment and development. http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/environmental.development.rio.declaration.1992/portrait.a4.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2019.

  • von Schomberg, R. (2006). The Precautionary Principle and its normative challenges. In E. Fisher, J. Jones, & R. von Schomberg (Eds.), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 19–42). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, J. (2010). The application of the Precautionary Principle in practice: Comparative dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Lud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lud, D. (2020). Precautionary Principle. In: Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Del Baldo, M., Abreu, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_168-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_168-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics