Advertisement

Eco-queering US K-12 Environmental Curricula

An Epistemic Conceptual Investigation into Queer Pessimisms Serving as a Pragmatics to Navigate Current Environmental Castrations
  • Peter ScaramuzzoEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

In his 2015 State of the Union, President Barack Obama called climate change the “greatest threat to future generations.” Conversely, President Donald Trump has cast doubt on the very existence of human-induced global climate change, thereby dismissing decades of empirically collected data by scientists around the world which, when aggregated, portray a warming world at and past the brink. Fierce global competition for dwindling resources is certain to increase as a result of the steady, irrevocable, and dramatic shifts in weather patterns which continue in causing catastrophic macro- and micro-[global] consequences, including consummately a loss of human life. While recommendations have been provided toward a mitigation of anthropogenic climate change through a re-envisioning of education standards, the United States’ panoptic, neoliberal educational behemoth has not kept pace with the necessary standards and curricular changes that might substantively and authentically address the realities of a rapidly changing global climate for those who inevitably will act as this world’s future stewards. Notable academic and recently deceased Chet Bowers has written extensively on this subject, suggesting in sum that such education is ostensibly a moral imperative requiring broad, interdisciplinary content inclusive of revised and radically upended modes of thinking, approach, and authentic feeling. An investigation into the burgeoning field of queer ecology offers an intersectional, discursive conceptual foundation toward the construction of such neo-curricula, which inherently and intentionally elides various disaggregated epistemological and ontological schools in unique, timely, and critical ways. The pessimistic epistemic postulations of queer scholars, such as Lee Edelman, provide insight catalyzing a dynamic and urgent thesis in curricular rethinking inclusive of queer eco-environmentalism as an integral, tenable tenet. This investigation seeks to negate optimistic, heteronormative conventions onto the urgent creation of eco-curricula and pedagogical practices in K-12 schools; the author contends that it is through a pedagogical recognition and embrace of discordant and othered ontological notions informed by queerness as a blurring space that an inspired salvation is possible. In this way, environmental optimism, as it is presented in current K-12 educational contexts, is a limited portrayal of current realities and, as such, assumes the position of a destructive pathology of deniability.

Keywords

Education Curriculum development Curriculum instruction Queer theory Queer ecology 

References

  1. Allen, L. (2018). Sexuality education and new materialism: Queer things. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beeler, C. (2018, Dec 11). UN compact recognizes climate change as driver of migration for first time. PRI: Public Radio International. Retrieved from https://www.pri.org/stories/2018-12-11/un-compact-recognizes-climate-change-driver-migration-first-time
  3. Berlak, A. (2004). Confrontation and pedagogy: Cultural secrets and emotion in antioppressive pedagogies. In M. Boler (Ed.), Democratic dialogue in education: Troubling speech, disturbing silence (pp. 123–144). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Bersani, L. (2018). Receptive bodies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boler, M. (2004). All speech is not free: The ethics of ‘affirmative action pedagogy’. In M. Boler (Ed.), Democratic dialogue in education: Troubling speech, disturbing silence (pp. 3–14). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Boler, M., & Zembylas, M. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding differences In: P. Trifonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social justice (pp. 110–136). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bowers, C. A. (1995). Educating for an ecologically sustainable culture: Rethinking moral education, creativity, intelligence, and other modern orthodoxies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. (n.p.): Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Domonoske, C. (2019). David Attenborough warns of ‘collapse of civilizations’ at U.N. climate meeting. NPR: National Public Radio. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2018/12/03/672893695/david-attenborough-warns-of-collapse-of-civilizations-at-u-n-climate-meeting
  11. Edelman, L. (1998). The future is kid stuff: Queer theory, disidentification, and the death drive. Narrative, 6(1), 18–30.Google Scholar
  12. Faulkner, J., & Crowhurst, M. (2014). So far multicultural that she is racist to Australians: Discomfort as a pedagogy for change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(3): 389–403.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.910251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1971, 2014). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (D. Macedo, Trans.). New York: Bloomsbury. (Original work published in 1968)Google Scholar
  14. Goldenberg, S. (2015, Jan 22). US Senate refuses to accept humanity’s role in global climate change, again. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  15. Holden, E. (2018, Oct 3). Trump races against clock to roll back major Obama-era environment rules. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/03/trump-administration-roll-back-major-obama-era-environment-policies
  16. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kishimoto, K., & Mwangi, M. (2009). Critiquing the rhetoric of ‘safety’ in feminist pedagogy: Women of color offering an account of ourselves. Feminist Teacher, 19(2), 87–102.  https://doi.org/10.1353/ftr.0.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mintz, A. (2013). Helping by hurting: the paradox of suffering in social justice education. Theory and Research in Education, 11(3), 215–230.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513498179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mufson, S. (2018, Dec 4). ‘A kind of dark realism’: Why the climate change problem is starting to look too big to solve. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/a-kind-of-dark-realism-why-the-climate-change-problem-is-starting-to-look-too-big-tosolve/2018/12/03/378e49e4-e75d-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html?utm_term=.e44940af1f5e
  21. Munoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ruti, M. (2017). The ethics of opting out: Queer Theory’s defiant subjects. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seymour, N. (2018). Bad environmentalism: Irony and irreverence in the ecological age. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slattery, P. (2013). Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. von Trier, L. (Director). (2011). Melancholia [Motion picture]. Denmark: Zentropa.Google Scholar
  26. Zembylas, M. (2015). ‘Pedagogy of discomfort’ and its ethical implications: the tensions of ethical violence in social justice education. Ethics and Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2015.1039274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zembylas, M., & Boler, M. (2002). On the spirit of patriotism: Challenges of a ‘pedagogy of discomfort’. Special issue on Education and September 11. Teachers College Record On-Line.Google Scholar
  28. Zembylas, M., & McGlynn, C. (2012). Discomforting pedagogies: Emotional tensions, ethical dilemmas and transformative possibilities. British Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 41–59.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.523779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations