Advertisement

Survey Methods in Health Services Research

  • Steven B. CohenEmail author
Reference work entry
Part of the Health Services Research book series (HEALTHSR)

Abstract

Health-care surveys serve as a critical source of essential information on trends in health-care costs, coverage, access, and health-care quality. The findings derived from these surveys often facilitate the development, implementation and evaluation of policies and practices addressing health care and health behaviors at the national level. This chapter serves to illustrate several survey methods that enhance the performance and utility of health services research efforts. Attention has been given to the topics of sample and survey designs, nonresponse and attrition, estimation, precision, sample size determination, and analytical techniques to control for survey design complexities in analysis. Several of the topics that are featured in this chapter are further connected by their substantive focus on the measurement of trends in health-care costs, coverage, access, and health-care utilization. In addition to highlighting underlying survey operations, estimates, and outputs, the topics that have been covered also serve to identify potential enhancements that facilitate improvements in design, data collection, estimation strategies, and ultimately analytical capacity for health services research efforts.

References

  1. Botman S, Moore T, Moriarity C, Parsons V. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2000;2(130)Google Scholar
  2. Chromy J. Variance estimators for a sequential sample selection procedure. In: Krewski D, Rao J, Platek R, editors. Current topics in survey sampling. New York: Academic Press; 1981. p. 329–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cochran W. Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley; 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen S. Methodology report #11: sample design of the 1997 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey household component. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2000. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/mr11/mr11.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen S. Design strategies and innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Med Care. 2003;4(7):5–12.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen S, Yu W. The utility of prediction models to oversample the long term uninsured. Med Care. 2009;47(1):80–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen S, DiGaetano R, Goksel H. Methodology report #5: estimation procedures in the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey household component. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 1999. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/mr5/mr5.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen SB, Machlin S, Branscome J. Patterns of attrition and reluctant response in the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. J Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2000;1(2):131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen S, Ezzati-Rice T, Yu W. Integrated survey designs: a framework for nonresponse bias reduction. J Econ Soc Meas. 2005;30(2-3):101–14.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen SB, Ezzati-Rice T, Yu W. The utility of extended longitudinal profiles in predicting future health care expenditures. Med Care. 2006a;44(5):45–53.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen S, Ezzati-Rice T, Yu W. The impact of survey attrition on health insurance coverage estimates in a National Longitudinal Health Care Survey. J Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2006b;6:111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen J, Cohen S, Banthin J. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice. Med Care. 2009;47(7):S1:44–50.Google Scholar
  13. Cox B, Cohen, S. Methodological issues for health care surveys. New York/Basel: 1985: Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
  14. Groves R, Heeringa S. Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 2006;169:439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groves R, Fowler F, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Tourangeau R. Survey methodology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen M, Hurwitz W. The problem of nonresponse in sample surveys. J Am Stat Assoc. 1946;41:517–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korn E, Graubard B. Analysis of health surveys. New York: Wiley; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynn P. Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madans J, Cohen S. Health surveys: a resource to inform health policy and practice. In: Health statistics in the 21st century: implications for health policy and practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  20. Rubin D. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Selden T, Hudson J. Access to care and utilization among children: estimating the effects of public and private coverage. Med Care. 2006;44(5):19–26.Google Scholar
  22. Short P, Graefe D. Battery-powered health insurance? Stability in coverage of the uninsured. Health Aff. 2003;22(6):244–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stinchcombe A, Jones C, Sheatsley P. Nonresponse bias for attitude questions. Public Opin Q. 1981;45:359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stoop I, Billiet J, Koch A, et al. Improving survey response. Chichester: Wiley; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vartivarian S, Jang S, Salvucci S, Kasprzyk D. Subsampling nonrespondents: Issue of calculating response rates. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods. Alexandria: American Statistical Association; 2006. p. 3796–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Statistical and Data SciencesRTI InternationalWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations