Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Model Management

  • Christoph QuixEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_911


Model management comprises technologies and mechanisms to support the integration, transformation, evolution, and matching of models. It aims at supporting metadata-intensive applications such as database design, data integration, and data warehousing. To achieve this goal, a model management system has to provide definitions for models (i.e., schemas represented in some metamodel), mappings (i.e., relationships between different models), and operators (i.e., operations that manipulate models and mappings). Model management has become more and more important, since the interoperability and/or integration of heterogeneous information systems is a frequent requirement of organizations. Some important operations in model management are Merge (integration of two models), Match (creating a mapping between two models), and ModelGen (transforming a model given in one modeling language into a corresponding model in a different modeling language).

The current understanding of model...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Atzeni P, Torlone R. Management of multiple models in an extensible database design tool. In: Advances in Database Technology, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Extending Database Technology; 1996. p. 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aumueller D, Do HH, Massmann S, Rahm E. Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2005. p. 906–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batini C, Lenzerini M, Navathe SB. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput Surv. 1986;18(4):323–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernstein PA, Halevy AY, Pottinger R. A vision for management of complex models. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 2000;29(4):55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernstein PA, Melnik S. Model management 2.0: Manipulating richer mappings. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2007. p. 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernstein PA, Rahm E. Data warehousing scenarios for model management. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling; 2000. p. 1–15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dolk DR. Model management and structured modeling: the role of an information resource dictionary system. Commun ACM. 1988; 31(6); 704–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fagin R, Kolaitis PG, Popa L, Tan WC. Composing schema mappings: second-order dependencies to the rescue. ACM Trans Database Syst. 2005;30(4):994–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hernández MA, Miller RJ, Haas LM. Clio: a semi-automatic tool for schema mapping. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2001. p. 607.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kensche D, Quix C, Chatti MA, Jarke M. GeRoMe: a generic role based metamodel for model management. J Data Semant. 2007; VIII:82–117.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kensche D, Quix C, Li X, Li Y. GeRoMeSuite: a system for holistic generic model management. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2007. p. 1322–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lenzerini M. Data integration: a theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems; 2002. p. 233–46.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Melnik S, Rahm E, Bernstein PA. Rondo: a programming platform for generic model management. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2003. p. 193–204.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rahm E, Bernstein PA. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB J. 2001;10(4):334–50.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spaccapietra S, Parent C. View integration: a step forward in solving structural conflicts. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 1994;6(2):258–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Manfred Jeusfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.IITUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden