Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

XML Views

  • Murali Mani
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_781

Synonyms

XML publishing

Definition

Database applications provide an XML view of their data so that the data is available to other applications, especially web applications. Database systems provide support for the client applications to use (query and/or manipulate) the data. The operations specified by the client applications are composed with the view definitions by the database system, thus performing these actions. The internal data model used by the database application, as well as how the operations are performed are transparent to the client applications; they see only an XML view of the entire system. XML views help the database systems to maintain their legacy data, as well as utilize the optimization features present in legacy systems (especially SQL engines), and at the same time make the data accessible to a wide range of web applications.

Historical Background

Views (external schema) are a feature [12] present universally in almost all database systems. Views provide data...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Braganholo VP, Davidson SB, Heuser CA. From XML view updates to relational view updates: old solutions to a new problem. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2004. p. 276–87.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bray T, Paoli J, Sperberg-McQueen CM, Maler E, Yergeau F. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0, W3C recommendation. Available at http://www.w3.org/XML
  3. 3.
    Dayal U, Bernstein PA. On the correct translation of update operations on relational views. ACM Trans Database Syst. 1982;7(3):381–416.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Sayed M, Rundensteiner EA, Mani M. Incremental maintenance of materialized XQuery views. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering; 2006. p. 129.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez M, Kadiyska Y, Suciu D, Morishima A, Tan W-C. SilkRoute: a framework for publishing relational data in XML. ACM Trans Database Syst. 2002;27(4):438–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin T, Libkin L. Incremental maintenance of views with duplicates. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 1995. p. 328–39.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keller AM. Algorithms for translating view updates to database updates for views involving selections, projections and joins. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems; 1985. p. 154–63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee D, Mani M, Chiu F, Chu WW. NeT & CoT: translating relational schemas to XML schemas using semantic constraints. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management; 2002. p. 282–90.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palpanas T, Sidle R, Cochrane R, Pirahesh H. Incremental maintenance for non-distributive aggregate functions. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2002. p. 802–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Popa L, Velegrakis Y, Miller RJ, Hernandez MA, Fagin R. Translating web data. In: Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2002. p. 598–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quass D. Maintenance expressions for views with aggregates. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Materialized Views: Techniques and Applications; 1996. p. 110–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramakrishnan R, Gehrke J. Database management systems. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shanmugasundaram J, Kiernan J, Shekita E, Fan C, Funderburk J. Querying XML views of relational data. In: Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2001. p. 261–27.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang L, Rundensteiner EA, Mani M. Updating XML views published over relational databases: towards the existence of a correct update mapping. Data Knowl Eng. 2006;58(3):263–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W3C XQuery Working Group. Available at http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Worcester PolytechnicWorcesterUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sihem Amer-Yahia
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Informatique de GrenobleCNRS and LIGGrenobleFrance