Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Trust in Blogosphere

  • Nitin Agarwal
  • Huan Liu
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_438

Synonyms

Relationship of reliance; Reputation

Definition

Trust can be defined as the relationship of reliance between two parties or individuals. Alice trusts Bob implies Alice’s reliance on the actions of Bob, based on what they know about each other. Trust is basically prediction of an otherwise unknown decision made by a party or an individual based on the actions of another party or individual. Trust is always directional and asymmetric. Alice trusts Bob does not imply Bob also trusts Alice.

From a sociological perspective, trust is the measure of belief of one party in another’s honesty, benevolence, and competence. Absence of any of these properties causes failure of trust. From a psychological perspective, trust can be defined as the ability of a party or an individual to influence the other. The more trusting someone is, the more easily he/she can be influenced.

The past couple of years witnessed significant changes in the interactions between the individuals and groups....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Agarwal N, Liu H, Tang L, Yu PS. Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golbeck J, Hendler J. Inferring binary trust relationships in web-based social networks. ACM Trans Internet Technol. 2006;6(4):497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guha R, Kumar R, Raghavan P, Tomkins A. Propagation of trust and distrust. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web; 2004. p. 403–12.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kale A, Karandikar A, Kolari P, Java A, Finin T, Joshi A. Modeling trust and influence in the blogosphere using link polarity. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pujol JM, Sangesa R, Delgado J. Extracting reputation in multi agent systems by means of social network topology. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems; 2002. p. 467–74.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sabater J, Sierra C. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems; 2002. p. 475–82.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Terveen L, McDonald DW. Social matching: a framework and research agenda. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2005;12(3):401–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu B, Singh MP. Detecting deception in reputation management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems; 2003. p. 73–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArkansasLittle RockUSA
  2. 2.Data Mining and Machine Learning Lab, School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA