Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Image Content Modeling

  • Harald Kosch
  • Mario Döller
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_1013

Synonyms

Conceptual image data model; Image data model; Image metadata

Definition

Image Content Modeling deals with the issue of representing the content of image data, that is, designing the high- and low-level abstraction model of the raw image objects and their correlations to facilitate various operations. These operations may include media object selection, insertion, editing, indexing, browsing, querying, retrieval, and exchange. The image content model relies, therefore, on the extraction of feature vectors and their respective representations obtained during the annotation process. Several standards for representing the content of an image are known. The most prominent ones are MPEG-7 and JPSearch including low- and high-level abstractions or the EXIF data description vocabulary for the description of very specific technical attributes of an image.

Historical Background

Many models for describing the content of an image have been created in the past. Most of them rely on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Kosch H. Distributed multimedia database technologies supported by MPEG-7 and MPEG-21. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Westermann U, Klas W. An analysis of XML database solutions for the management of MPEG-7 media descriptions. ACM Comput Surv. 2003;35(4):331–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Döller M, Kosch H. The MPEG-7 Multimedia database system (MPEG-7 MMDB). J Syst Softw. 2008;81(9):1559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caliph LM, Emir. MPEG-7 photo annotation and retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Multimedia; 2009. p. 925–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Temmermans F, Döller M, Vanhamel I, Jansen B, Munteanu A, Schelkens P. JPSearch: an answer to the lack of standardization in mobile image retrieval. Sig Process Image Commun. 2013;28(4):386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu G. Multimedia database management systems. London: Artech House; 1999.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veltkamp RC, Tanase M. Content-based image retrieval systems: a survey. Technical report. The Netherlands: Utrecht University; 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deselaers T, Keysers D, Ney H. Features for image retrieval: an experimental comparison. Inf Retr. 2008;11(2):77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Y, Zhang D, Lu G, Ma WY. A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recogn. 2007;40(1):262–82.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oria V, Özsu MT, Iglinski PJ. Foundation of the DISIMA image query languages. Multimed Tools Appl J. 2004;23(3):185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jörgensen C, Jaimes A, Benitez AB, Chang S-F. A conceptual framework and empirical research for classifying visual descriptors. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2001;52(11):938–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosch H, Böszörményi L, Döller M, Kofler A, Schojer P, Libsie M. The life cycle of multimedia meta-data. IEEE Multimed. 2005;12(1):80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tseng BL, Lin C-Y, Smith JR. Using MPEG-7 and MPEG-21 for personalizing video. IEEE Multimed. 2004;11(1):42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PassauPassauGermany
  2. 2.University of Applied Science KufsteinKufsteinAustria

Section editors and affiliations

  • Vincent Oria
    • 1
  • Shin'ichi Satoh
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceNew Jersey Inst. of TechnologyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Digital Content and Media Sciences ReseaMultimedia Information Research DivisionNational Institute of InformaticsTokyoJapan