Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Economics Imperialism in Law and Economics

  • Magdalena MałeckaEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_741

Definition

Economics imperialism is a type of an interdisciplinary relation between the scientific discipline of economics and other disciplines of the social sciences. The disciplines that are often claimed to be “imperialized” by economics are sociology (see Granovetter and Swedberg 2001; Swedberg 1990), political science (see Hodgson 1994; Sigelman and Goldfarb 2012; Kuorikoski and Lehtinen 2010), anthropology (see Marchionatti and Cedrini 2016), geography (see Mäki and Marchionni 2010), and law (see Medema 2018; Davies 2010; Fink 2003). Hence, the law and economics movement is seen by some as one of the manifestations of the imperialism of economics in the social sciences (in this case – in legal scholarship). Below, I review the general debate on economics imperialism, and then I discuss the attempts to analyze law and economics as a case of economics imperialism.

Introduction

Recently, in the philosophy of science literature there is a discussion on scientific imperialism, of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amadae SM (2018) Economics imperialism reconsidered. In: Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. Routledge, p 4Google Scholar
  2. Becker GS (1971) Economic theory. Alfred A. Knopt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Chassonnery-Zaïgouche C (2018) Crossing boundaries, displacing previous knowledge and claiming superiority. In: Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. Routledge, p 31Google Scholar
  4. Clarke S, Walsh A (2009) Scientific imperialism and the proper relations between the sciences. Int Stud Philos Sci 23(2):195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke S, Walsh A (2013) Imperialism, progress, developmental teleology, and interdisciplinary unification. Inter Stud Philos Sci 27(3):341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooter RD (1981) Law and the imperialism of economics: an introduction to the economic analysis of law and a review of the major books. UCLA Law Rev 29:1260Google Scholar
  7. Cooter R (1995) Law and unified social theory. J Law Soc 22(1):50–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies W (2010) Economics and the ‘nonsense’of law: the case of the Chicago antitrust revolution. Econ Soc 39(1):64–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis JB (2012) Mäki on economics imperialism. In: Economics for real: Uskali Mäki and the place of truth in economics. Routledge, pp 203–219Google Scholar
  10. Davis JB (2015) Economics imperialism versus multidisciplinarityGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupré J (1994) Against scientific imperialism. In PSA: proceedings of the Biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, Philosophy of Science Association, vol 1994, no 2, pp 374–381Google Scholar
  12. Dupré J (2001) Human nature and the limits of science. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fine B, Milonakis D (2009) From economics imperialism to freakonomics: the shifting boundaries between economics and other social sciences. Routledge, London/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fink EM (2003) Post-realism, or the jurisprudential logic of late capitalism: a socio-legal analysis of the rise and diffusion of law and economics. Hastings LJ, 55, 931Google Scholar
  15. Granovetter M, Swedberg R (2001) The sociology of economic life, 2nd edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  16. Guilhot N, Marciano A (2018) Rational choice as neo-decisionism. In: Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Harnay S, Marciano A (2009) Posner, economics and the law: from “law and economics” to an economic analysis of law. J Hist Econ Thought 31(2):215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirshleifer J (1985) The expanding domain of economics. Am Econ Rev 75(6):53–68Google Scholar
  19. Hodgson GM (1994) Some remarks on ‘economic imperialism’and international political economy. Rev Int Polit Econ 1(1):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson N (1984) The economic explanation of legal phenomena. Int Rev Law Econ 4(2):163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kidd JI (2013) Historical contingency and the impact of scientific imperialism. Int Stud Philos Sci 27(3):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuorikoski J, Lehtinen A (2010) Economics imperialism and solution concepts in political science. Philos Soc Sci 40(3):347–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazear EP (2000) Economic imperialism. Q J Econ 115(1):99–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mäki U (2009) Economics imperialism: concept and constraints. Philos Soc Sci 39(3):351–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mäki U (2013) Scientific imperialism: difficulties in definition, identification, and assessment. Int Stud Philos Sci 27(3):325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mäki U, Marchionni C (2010) Is geographical economics imperializing economic geography? J Econ Geogr 11(4):645–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mäki U, Walsh A, Pinto MF (eds) (2018) Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  28. Małecka M, Lepenies R (2018) Is the behavioral approach a form of scientific imperialism? An analysis of law and policy. In: Mäki U, Walsh A, Pinto MF (eds) Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  29. Marchionatti R, Cedrini M (2016) Economics as social science: economics imperialism and the challenge of interdisciplinarity. Taylor & Francis, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marino P (2018) Ethical implications of scientific imperialism. Two examples from economics. In: Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Medema SG (2015) From dismal to dominance? Law and economics: philosophical issues and fundamental questions 22: 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Medema SG (2018) Scientific imperialism or merely boundary crossing? In: Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Mercuro N, Medema SG (2006) Economics and the law: from posner to postmodernism and beyond, 2nd edn. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Nik-Khah E, Van Horn R (2012) Inland empire: economics imperialism as an imperative of Chicago neoliberalism. J Econ Methodol 19(3):259–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pearson H (1997) Origins of law and economics: the economists’ new science of law, 1830–1930. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Posner R (1989) Foreword. In: Faure M, van den Bergh R (eds) Essays in law and economics: corporations, accident prevention and compensation for losses. Maklu, AntwerpenGoogle Scholar
  37. Radnitzky G, Bernholz P (eds) (1987) Economic imperialism: the economic approach applied outside the field of economics. Paragon House Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Sigelman L, Goldfarb R (2012) The influence of economics on political science: by what pathway? J Econ Methodol 19(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stigler GJ (1984) Economics: the imperial science? Scand J Econ 86(3):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swedberg R (1990) Economics and sociology: redefining their boundaries: conversations with economists and sociologists. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  41. Tullock G (1972) Economic imperialism. In: Theory of public choice. The University of Michigan Press, pp 317–29Google Scholar
  42. Vromen JJ (2009) The booming economics-made-fun genre: more than having fun, but less than economics imperialism. Erasmus J Philos Econ 2(1):70–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TINT – Centre for Philosophy of Social ScienceUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland