Skip to main content

Positional Goods and Legal Orderings

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Abstract

People consume because others consume, maintained Veblen in 1899. More recently, theoretical, empirical, and experimental articles have argued that people constantly compare themselves to their environments and care greatly about their relative positions.

Given that competition for positions may produce social costs, we adopt a Law and Economics approach (i) to suggest legal remedies for positional competition and (ii) to argue that, because legal relations are characterized in turn by positional characteristics, such legal remedies do not represent “free lunches.

Upon passing by a small village of barbarians,

Julius Caesar asserted

“[f]or my part, I had rather be the first man among these fellows than the second man in Rome”.

(Plutarch)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O, Martinsson P (2007) Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica 74:586–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Frijters P, Shields MA (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J Econ Lit 74(2):425–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Dari-Mattiacci G, Plisecka AE (2012) Luxury in ancient Rome. An economic analysis of the scope, timing and enforcement of sumptuary laws. Leg Roots, Int J Roman Law, Leg Hist Comp Law 1:189–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito L, Vatiero M (2011) Beyond legal relations: Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld’s influence on American institutionalism. J Econ Issues 45(1):199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito L, Vatiero M (2013) A joint reading of positional and relational goods. Econ Politica – J Anal Inst Econ 30(1):87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (1985a) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Am Econ Rev 75(1):101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (1985b) Choosing the right pond: human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (2008) Should public policy respond to positional externalities? J Public Econ 92:1777–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (2012) The Darwin economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40:402–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grillo M (1995) Introduzione. In: Grillo M (ed) Impresa, Mercato e Diritto. Bologna, Mulino

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch F (1976) The social limits to growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins E, Kornienko T (2004) Running to keep in the same place: consumer choice as a game of status. Am Econ Rev 94(4):1085–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams RH (1992) Relative preferences. Yale Law J 102(1):1–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano U (1999) Is power an economic good? Notes on social scarcity and the economics of positional goods. In: Bowles S, Franzini M, Pagano U (eds) The politics and the economics of power. Routledge, London, pp 116–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano U (2000) Public markets, private orderings and corporate governance. Int Rev Law Econ 20(4):453–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano U (2012) No institution is a free lunch: a reconstruction of Ronald Coase. Int Rev Econ 59(2):189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano U, Vatiero M (2015) Costly institutions as substitutes: novelty and limits of the Coasian approach. J Inst Econ 11(2):265–281. Coase memorial issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M (2007) The nature, history and significance of the concept of positional goods. Hist Econ Rev 45:60–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick SJ, Hemenway D (1998) Is more always better? A survey on positional concerns. J Econ Behav Organ 37(3):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick SJ, Hemenway D (2005) Are positional concerns stronger in some domains than in others? Am Econ Rev 95(2):147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatiero M (2009) Understanding power. A law and economics’ approach. VDM-Verlag, Saarbrucken

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatiero M (2010) From W. N. Hohfeld to J. R. Commons, and beyond? Am J Econ Sociol 69(2):840–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatiero M (2013a) Positional goods and Robert Lee Hale’s legal economics. J Inst Econ 9(3):351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatiero M (2013b) Alla ricerca di regole (e istituzioni) efficienti. Riv Crit Dirit Priv 31(1):123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1899) The theory of the leisure class. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Pagano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pagano, U., Vatiero, M. (2019). Positional Goods and Legal Orderings. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_730

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics