Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Calabresi: Heterodox Economic Analysis of Law

  • Alain MarcianoEmail author
  • Giovanni Battista Ramello
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_726

Abstract

Guido Calabresi is one of the founders of the law and economics movement. His approach, however, corresponds to a form of economic analysis of law that, we claim, is heterodox. We show why in this short notice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Benforado A, Hanson J (2005) The costs of dispositionism: the premature demise of situationist economics. Md Law Rev 64:24–84Google Scholar
  2. Blum W, Kalven H Jr (1967) The empty Cabinet of Dr. Calabresi: auto accidents and general deterrence. Univ Chic Law Rev 34(2):239–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calabresi G (1961) Some thoughts on risk distribution and the law of torts. Yale Law J 70(4):499–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calabresi G (1971) The costs of accidents: a legal and economic analysis. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  5. Calabresi G (2014) A broader view of the cathedral: the significance of the liability rule, correcting a misapprehension. Law Contemp Probl 77(2):1–14Google Scholar
  6. Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denozza, F. (2013), ‘il modello dell’analisi economica del diritto: come si spiega il tanto successo di una tanto debole teoria?’, 11(2):Ars Intepretandi, 43–67Google Scholar
  8. Kalman L (2014) Some thoughts on Yale and Guido. Law Contemp Probl 77(2):15–43Google Scholar
  9. Marciano A (2012) Guido Calabresi’s economic analysis of law, Coase and the Coase theorem. Int Rev Law Econ 32:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marciano A, Ramello GB (2014) Consent, choice and Guido Calabresi’s Heterodox economic analysis of law. Law Contemp Probl 77(2):97–116Google Scholar
  11. Mattei, U. (1994), ‘Efficiency in Legal transplants: an Essay in Comparative Law and Economics’, International Review of Law and Economics, 14:13–19Google Scholar
  12. Posner RA (1972) Economic analysis of law. Little, Brown and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Michelman F (1971) Pollution as a tort: a non-accidental perspective on Calabresi’s costs. Yale Law J 80:647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramello GB (2016) The past, present and future of comparative law and economics. In: Ramello G (ed) Comparative law and economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alain Marciano
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Giovanni Battista Ramello
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.MRE and University of MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Faculté d’EconomieUniversité de Montpellier and LAMETA-UMR CNRSMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.DiGSPESUniversity of Eastern PiedmontAlessandriaItaly
  4. 4.IELTorinoItaly