Skip to main content

Counterfeiting Models: Mathematical/Economic

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Abstract

Counterfeiting and piracy are illicit activities infringing IPR (intellectual property rights). The market for counterfeit can be divided into two important submarkets. In the primary market, consumers purchase counterfeit products believing they have purchased genuine articles (deceptive counterfeiting). In the secondary market, consumers knowingly buy counterfeit products (nondeceptive counterfeiting).

Counterfeiting has, obviously, consequences on genuine producers and consumers; nevertheless, it can have general socioeconomic effects.

There is a considerable body of theoretical and empirical literature on the mechanisms of counterfeit trade and on the economic and social effects of counterfeiting. A number of the methodological papers are undertaken within the framework of operations research and game theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abalos RJ (1985) Commercial trademark counterfeiting in the United States, the third world and beyond: American and international attempts to stem the tide. Boston Coll Third World Law J 5:151–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian X, Kai-Yu W, Smith A, Yannopoulou N (2016) New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. J Bus Res 69:4249–4258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buratto A, Grosset L, Zaccour G (2015) Strategic pricing and advertising in the presence of a counterfeiter. IMA J Manag Math 27:397–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesareo L (2016) Counterfeiting and piracy. A comprehensive literature review. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chacharkar DY (2013) Brand imitation, counterfeiting and consumers. Centre for Consumer Studies Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry PE, Zimmerman A (2013) Protecting your intellectual property rights. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cho SH, Fang X, Tayur S (2015) Combating strategic counterfeiters in licit and illicit supply chains. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 17:273–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Liddo A (2015) Does counterfeiting benefit genuine manufacturer? The role of production costs. Eur J Law Econ 3:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend M, Schuchert-Güler P (2006) Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Acad Mark Sci Rev 10:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry JW, Putrevu S, Shultz CJ II (2006) The effects of counterfeiting on consumer search. J Consum Behav 5:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1988a) Counterfeit-product trade. Am Econ Rev 78:59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1988b) Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Q J Econ 103:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICC (2017.) https://cdn.iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/02/ICC-BASCAP-Frontier-report-2016.pdf. Last accessed 30 Mar 2017

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2008) The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/EUIPO (2016) Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods: mapping the economic impact. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y (2014) Brand management and strategies against counterfeits. J Econ Manag Strateg 23:317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staake T, Thiesse T, Fleisch E (2009) The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review. Eur J Mark 43:320–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao JT (2005) How a luxury monopolist might benefit from a stringent counterfeit monitoring regime. Int J Bus Econ 4:177–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao JT (2015) The impact of counterfeit-purchase penalties on anti-counterfeiting under deceptive counterfeiting. J Econ Bus 80:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang RQ (2015) Supply chain structure in a market with deceptive counterfeits. Eur J Oper Res 240:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Di Liddo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Di Liddo, A. (2019). Counterfeiting Models: Mathematical/Economic. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_705

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics