Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Trial: Implicit Biases

  • Goran DominioniEmail author
  • Alessandro Romano
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_668

Abstract

A large body of research in implicit social cognition indicates that implicit racial biases affect human decision-making. Building on these findings, legal scholars have explored how and under which circumstances implicit racial biases affect the functioning of trial systems. This entry reviews this literature. First, it provides an overview of the main results of, and methods employed in, studies on implicit racial biases. Second, it reviews the applications of these findings for the study of criminal and employment discrimination trials and the policies that could be implemented to reduce the effect of these biases on the decision-making of the relevant actors. It concludes with some suggestions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cameron CD, Brown-Iannuzzi JL, Payne BK (2012) Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition a meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 16(4):330–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eisenberg T, Johnson SL (2004) Implicit racial attitudes of death penalty lawyers. DePaul Law Rev 53(4):1539–1556Google Scholar
  3. Fazio RH, Olson MA (2003) Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annu Rev Psychol 54:297–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ (1995) Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? J Pers Soc Psychol 69(6):1013–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garoupa NM (2012) The economics of prosecutors. In: Harel A, Hylton K (eds) Research handbook on the economics of criminal law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 231–242Google Scholar
  6. Gertner N, Hart M (2012) Employment law: implicit bias in employment discrimination litigation. In: Levinson JD, Smith RJ (eds) Implicit racial biases across the law. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 80–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenwald AG, Krieger LH (2006) Implicit bias: scientific foundations. Calif Law Rev 94(4):945–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1464–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR (2009) Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 97(1):17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR, Nosek BA (2015) Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects. J Pers Soc Psychol 108(4):553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunt JS (2015) Race, ethnicity, and culture in jury decision making. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci 11:269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jolls C, Sunstein CR (2006) The law of implicit bias. Calif Law Rev 94(4):969–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jolls C, Sunstein CR, Thaler R (1998) A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanf Law Rev 50(5):1471–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang J, Bennett M, Carbado D, Casey P (2012) Implicit bias in the courtroom. UCLA Law Rev 59(5):1124–1187Google Scholar
  16. Kaplow L (1994) The value of accuracy in adjudication: an economic analysis. J Leg Stud 23(1):307–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kubota JT, Banaji MR, Phelps EA (2012) The neuroscience of race. Nat Neurosci 15(7):940–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levinson JD (2007) Forgotten racial equality: implicit bias, decisionmaking, and misremembering. Duke Law J 57(2):345–424Google Scholar
  19. Levinson JD, Cai H, Young D (2010) Guilty by implicit racial bias: the guilty/not guilty implicit association test. Ohio State Univ J Crim Law 8(1):187–208Google Scholar
  20. Levinson JD, Smith RJ, Young DM (2014) Devaluing death: an empirical study of implicit racial bias on jury-eligible citizens in six death penalty states. NYU Law Rev 89(2):513–581Google Scholar
  21. McAdams R, Ulen T (2009) Criminal behavioral law and economics. In: Garoupa N (ed) Criminal law and economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 403–436Google Scholar
  22. Nosek BA, Hansen JJ, Devos T, Lindner NM, Ranganath KA, Smith CT, Olson KR, Chugh D, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR (2007) Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 30(1):36–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, Jaccard J, Tetlock PE (2013) Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. J Pers Soc Psychol 105(2):171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rachlinski JJ, Johnson SL, Wistrich AJ, Guthrie C (2009) Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges? Notre Dame Law Rev 84(3):1195–1246Google Scholar
  25. Richardson LS, Goff PA (2013) Implicit racial bias in public defender triage. Yale Law J 122(8):2626–2650Google Scholar
  26. Smith RJ, Cohen GB (2012) Capital punishment: choosing life or death (implicitly). In: Levinson JD, Smith RJ (eds) Implicit racial biases across the law. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith RJ, Levinson JD (2011) Impact of implicit racial bias on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. Seattle Univ Law Rev 35(3):795–826Google Scholar
  28. Teichman D, Zamir E (2014) Judicial Decisionmaking: a behavioral perspective. In: Zamir E, Teichman D (eds) The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 664–702Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotterdam Institute of Law and EconomicsErasmus School of LawRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.China-EU School of LawChina University of Political Science and LawBeijingChina