Abstract
Whenever agents choose A instead of B, B instead of C, and C instead of A, a logical contradiction arises. This contradiction – also known as a value anomaly – characterizes genuine choices. Some organizations and firms, but also legal systems, markets, or even the human brain can be regarded as complex systems that manage the value anomaly by operating with multiple mutually incompatible ordering principles. Such a management – as opposed to a mere elimination – of these mutually incompatible values allows these systems to better cope with uncertainty, and to benefit from the recognition of complexity. One of the central implications of these heterarchical systems is that there is no single scale on which unequals can be compared and, consequently, that commensuration is an active process which involves friction and opportunities for entrepreneurship. We argue that in a world that naturally seems to be characterized by these value anomalies, heterarchical organizations and, in particular, heterarchy as a complex system of valuation might well be a good response.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baumann R, Dingwerth K (2015) Global governance vs empire: why world order moves towards heterarchy and hierarchy. J Int Relat Dev 18(1):104–128
Boltanski L, Thévenot L (2006) On justification: economies of worth. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bruni LE, Giorgi F (2015) Towards a heterarchical approach to biology and cognition. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 119(3):481–492
Crumley CL (1995) Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies. Archeol Pap Am Anthropol Assoc 6(1):1–5
Dekker E, Kuchař P (2016) Exemplary goods: the product as economic variable. Schmollers Jahr 136(3):237–256
Dekker E, Kuchař P (2017) Emergent orders of worth: must we agree on more than a price? Cosmos + Taxis 4(1):23–35
Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annu Rev Sociol 24:313–343
Girard M, Stark D (2003) Heterarchies of value in Manhattan-based new media firms. Theory Cult Soc 20(3):77–105
Halberstam D (2008) Constitutional heterarchy: the centrality of conflict in the European Union and the United States. University of Michigan Public Law working paper, no. 111. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1147769
Hedlund G (1986) The hypermodern MNC – a heterarchy? Hum Resour Manag 25(1):9–35
Hedlund G (1993) Assumptions of hierarchy and heterarchy, with applications to the Management of the Multinational Corporation. In: Ghoshal S, Eleanor Westney D (eds) Organization theory and the multinational corporation. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 211–236
Hedlund G, Dag R, Bartlett CA, Doz Y, Hedlund G (1990) Action in heterarchies: new approaches to managing the MNC. Manag Glob Firm:15–46
Hutter M, Teubner G (1993) The parasitic role of hybrids. J Inst Theor Econ (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 149(4):706–715
Joerges C, Sand I-J, Teubner G (eds) (2004) Transnational governance and constitutionalism. International studies in the theory of private law. Hart, Oxford
Kopytoff I (1988) The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective, 1st Paperback Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64–95
McCulloch WS (1945) A Heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. Bull Math Biophys 7(2):89–93
Mill JS (1863) Utilitarianism. Parker, Son & Bourn, West Strand, London
Nussbaum MC (1984) Plato on commensurability and desire. Proc Aristot Soc Suppl vol 58:55–80
Nussbaum MC (1986) The fragility of goodness: luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Ostrom E (1965) Public entrepreneurship: a case study in ground Water Basin management. University of California, Los Angeles
Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:641–672
Ostrom E, Parks RB (1973) Suburban police departments: too many and too small? In: Masotti LH, Hadden JK (eds) The urbanization of the suburbs. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 367–402
Posner RA (1973) Economic analysis of law. Aspen Publishers, New York
Shackle GLS (1979) Imagination and the nature of choice. Columbia University Press, New York
Stark D (2009) The sense of dissonance: accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Stark D (2017) For what it’s worth. Research in the sociology of organizations 52 (justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations: contributions from French pragmatist sociology)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dekker, E., Kuchař, P. (2019). Heterarchy. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_640
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_640
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences