Skip to main content

Causation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

Causation is often said to be one of the most intricate issues in private law. This entry deals with how causation is considered from a law and economics point of view and contributes to enhance our understanding of causation requirements in the law. First, it deals with the main distinction between ex ante and ex post approach of causation. This leads to study the relationships between causation requirements and efficiency, and the concept of scope of liability is discussed. Then, this economic approach is extended to more difficult cases implying uncertainty. Last, it provides some insights on how these findings remain relevant when considering bounded rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Law Institute (2010) Restatement (third) of the law of torts: liability for physical and emotional harm

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Shahar O (2009) Causation and foreseeability. In: Faure M (ed) Tort law and economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 83–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghetti JS (2016) Causation in hepatitis B vaccination litigation in France: breaking through scientific uncertainty. Chicago Kent Law Rev 91:543–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G (1970) The costs of accidents. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G (1975) Concerning cause and the law of torts: an essay for Harry Kalven. Univ Chicago Law Rev 43:69–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JL (1992) Risks and wrongs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter RD (1987) Torts as the Union of Liberty and Efficiency: an essay on causation. Chicago Kent Law Rev 63:522–551

    Google Scholar 

  • European Group on Tort Law (2005) Principles of European tort law. Text and commentary. Springer, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferey S, G’Sell F (2013) Pour une prise en compte des parts de marché dans la détermination de la contribution à la dette de réparation. Recueil Dalloz 41:2709

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady MF (1983) A new positive theory of negligence. Yale Law J 92:799–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady MF (1989) Untaken precautions. J Leg Stud 18:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady MF (2014) Marginal causation and injurer shirking. J Tort Law 7:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA, Honoré T (1985) Causation in the law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hylon KN (2014) Information and causation in tort law: generalizing the learned hand test for causation cases. J Tort Law 7:35–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan M (1989) Causation and incentives to take care under the negligence rule. J Leg Stud 18:427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farra, Strauss & Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye D (1982) The limits of the preponderance of the evidence standard: justifiably naked statistical evidence and multiple causation. Am Bar Found Res J 7:487–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes WM, Posner RA (1983) Causation in tort law: an economic approach. J Leg Stud 12:109–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levmore S (2001) Conjunction and aggregation. Michigan Law Rev 99:723–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks SV (1994) Discontinuities, causation, and Grady’s uncertainty theorem. J Leg Stud 23:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli TJ (1997) Economics of the law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Porat A, Posner EA (2012) Aggregation and law. Yale Law J 122:2–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Porat A, Posner EA (2014) Offsetting Benefits. Virginia Law Rev 100:1165–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Porat A, Stein A (2001) Tort liability under uncertainty. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlinski JJ (1998) A positive psychological theory of judging in hindsight. Univ Chicago Law Rev 65:571–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S (1990) Market-share allocations in tort law: strengths and weaknesses. J Leg Stud 19:739–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2004) Foundations of economic analysis of law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton J (2013) Unnecessary causes. Law Q J 129:39–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW (1985a) Causation in tort law. California Law Rev 73:1735–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW (1985b) Actual causation vs. probabilistic linkage: the bane of economic analysis. J Leg Stud 14:435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW, Puppe I (2016) Causation: linguistic, philosophical, legal and economic. Chicago Kent Law Rev 91:461–506

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Ferey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ferey, S. (2019). Causation. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_633

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics