Abstract
This essay sketches the central features of Gordon Tullock’s (1922–2014) contributions to law and economics. My reference to Tullock as a “maverick scholar” is to indicate that he stood apart from the mainstream of law and economics scholarship as this is represented by Richard Posner’s canonical statement that the common law reflects a relentless pursuit of economic efficiency. In contrast, Tullock denied efficiency claims on behalf of common law. Examination of Tullock’s contrary claim illustrates how any analytical claim necessarily rests on and is derived from some preceding set of conceptual presuppositions because such qualities as “efficiency” are not objects of direct apprehension but rather are inferences derived from particular theoretical frameworks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berlin I (1970) The hedgehog and the fox: an essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. Simon and Schuster, New York
Brady G, Tollison RD (1991) Gordon Tullock: creative maverick of public choice. Public Choice 71:141–148
Buchanan JM (1987) The qualities of a natural economist. In: Rowley CK (ed) Democracy and public choice: essays in honor of Gordon Tullock. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 9–19
Emmett RB (2006) Die gustibus est disputandum: Frank H. Knight’s response to George Stigler and Gary Becker’s ‘die gustibus non est disputandum’. J Econ Methodol 13:97–111
Goetz CJ (1987) Public choice and the law: the paradox of Tullock. In: Rowley CK (ed) Democracy and public choice: essays in honor of Gordon Tullock. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 171–180
Neyman J (1950) First course in probability and statistics. Henry Holt, New York
Posner RA (1973) Economic analysis of law. Little, Brown, Boston. (8th edn, 2011)
Reder M (1982) Chicago economics: permanence and change. J Econ Lit 20:1–38
Reder MW (1999) Economics: the culture of a controversial science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rowley CK (ed) (2004–2006) The selected works of Gordon Tullock. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis
Schmitt C (1996 [1932]) The concept of the political. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Stigler GJ, Becker GS (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum. Am Econ Rev 67:76–90
Tullock G (1965) Constitutional mythology. New Individualist Rev 3:13–17
Tullock G (1971) The logic of the law. Basic Books, New York
Tullock G (1980a) Trials on trial: the pure theory of legal procedure. Columbia University Press, New York
Tullock G (1980b) Two kinds of legal efficiency. Hofstra Law Rev 9:659–669
Tullock G (1996) Legal heresy. Econ Inq 34:1–9
Wagner RE (1987) Gordon Tullock as rhetorical economist. In: Rowley CK (ed) Democracy and public choice: essays in honor of Gordon Tullock. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 27–38
Wagner RE (2008) Finding social dilemma: West of Babel, not east of Eden. Public Choice 135:55–66
Wagner RE (2010) Mind, society, and human action: time and knowledge in a theory of social economy. Routledge, London
Zywicki TJ (2008) Spontaneous order and the common law: Gordon Tullock’s critique. Public Choice 135:35–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wagner, R.E. (2019). Gordon Tullock: A Maverick Scholar of Law and Economics. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_597
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_597
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences