Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Crime: Expressive Crime and the Law

  • Martin A. LerochEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_59

Abstract

Expressive crime contrasts with instrumental crime in that delinquents aim to “make a statement”, and not to “make a living”. This difference in motivation has important consequences for the deterrent effect of policies. Whereas policies aiming at expected material costs of perpetrators have often proven successful in deterring instrumental crime, they may fail to deter delinquents with expressive motivations. In some cases, perpetrators may even feel defied to increase their activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cameron S (1988) The economics of crime deterrence: a survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos 41:301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kirchgässner G (2011) Econometric estimates of deterrence of the death penalty: facts or ideology? Kyklos 64(3):448–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Klick J, Tabarrok A (2005) Using terror alert levels to estimate the effect of police on crime. J Law Econ 48(2):267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Leroch M (2014) Punishment as defiance: deterrence and perverse effects in the case of expressive crime. CESifo Econ Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ift009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Opp K-D (1989) The economics of crime and the sociology of deviant behaviour: a theoretical confrontation of basic propositions. Kyklos 42(3):405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robinson PH, Darley JM (2004) Does criminal law deter? A behavioural science investigation. Oxf J Leg Stud 24(2):173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and EconomyJohannes Gutenberg Universität MainzMainzGermany