Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Traffic Lights Violations

  • Laurent CarnisEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_588

Abstract

Traffic light running is a violation of Highway Code that endangers the offender as well as other road users. The consequences of crash risk induced by this reckless behavior can be interpreted as a social cost and call for public intervention. Several tools are available for policy makers to enforce traffic light obedience. However, the cost of public intervention must be in line with the social cost of violations.

Although there is a sizable literature dealing with traffic light running, researchers generally focus on the predictors of such behavior and the impact of the countermeasures. This entry presents a literature overview from an economic perspective and proposes an economic analysis of traffic light violations and their regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Avineri E (2014) Nudging safer road behaviours, technical report. Afeka Center for Infrastructure, Transportation and LogisticsGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 78:168–217Google Scholar
  3. Carnis L (2010) A neo-institutional economic approach to automated speed enforcement systems. Eur Trans Res Rev 2(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnis L, Kemel E (2012) Assessing the role of context in traffic light violations. Econ Bull 32(4):3386–3393Google Scholar
  5. Carnis L, Dik R, Kemel E (2012) Should I stay or should I go? Uncovering the factors of red light runnings in a field study. In: Proceedings of the 40th European transport conference, Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. CERTU (2010) Guide de conception des carrefours à feux, technical report. Centre d’Etudes sur les Réseaux, les Transports, l’Urbanisme et les constructions publiquesGoogle Scholar
  7. Council FM, Persaud B, Eccles KA, Lyon C, Griffith MS (2005) Safety evaluation of red-light cameras, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-HRT-05-048, pp 95Google Scholar
  8. CSA (2002) Red light camera programs: Although they have contributed to a reduction in accidents, operational weaknesses exist at the local level, technical report. Bureau of State AuditGoogle Scholar
  9. Depken C, Sonora R (2009) Inadvertent red light violations: an economic analysis, Mimeo, p. 32. belkcollegeofbusiness.uncc.edu.cdepken/P/redlights.pdf
  10. Elmitiny N, Yan X, Radwan E, Russo C, Nashar D (2010) Classification analysis of driver’s stop/go decision and red-light running violation. Accid Analy Prev 42(1):101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erke A (2009) Red light for red-light cameras? A meta-analysis of the effects of red-light cameras on crashes. Accid Analy Prev 41(5):897–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fehr E, Schmidt K (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism–experimental evidence and new theories’. In: Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 615–691Google Scholar
  13. FHA (2005) Red light camera systems, operational guidelines, technical report. Federal Highway AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrett TA, Wagner GA (2009) Red ink in the rearview mirror: local fiscal conditions and the issuance of traffic tickets. J Law Econ 52(1):71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallmark S, Orellana M, McDonald T, Fitzsimmons E, Matulac D (2010) Red light running in Iowa. Trans Res Rec: J Trans Res Board 2182(1):48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Høye A (2013) Still red light for red light cameras? An update. Accid Analy Prevent 55:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Langland-Orban B, Pracht EE, Large JT, Zhang N, Tepas JT (2014) Explaining differences in crash and injury crash outcomes in red light camera studies. Eval Health Prof 1–19 (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  18. Lund AK, Kyrychenko SY, Retting RA (2009) Caution: a comment on Alena Erke’s red light for red-light cameras? A meta-analysis of the effects of red-light cameras on crashes. Accid Analy Prevent 41(4):895–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGee H, Eccles K (2003) Impact of red light camera enforcement on crash experience, a synthesis of highway practice, technical report. NCHRP synthesisGoogle Scholar
  20. Papaioannou P (2007) Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece. Accid Analy Prevent 39(1):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter BE, England KJ (2000) Predicting red-light running behavior: a traffic safety study in three urban settings. J Safety Res 31(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Retting RA, Williams AF, Greene MA (1998) Red-light running and sensible countermeasures: summary of research findings. Trans Res Record: J Trans Res Board 1640(1):23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Retting RA, Ulmer RG, Williams AF (1999) Prevalence and characteristics of red light running crashes in the united states. Accid Analy Prevent 31(6):687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Retting RA, Ferguson SA, Farmer CM (2008) Reducing red light running through longer yellow signal timing and red light camera enforcement: results of a field investigation. Accid Analy Prevent 40(1):327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Slone S (2014) Speed and red light cameras law, technical report. Capitol Research, The Council of State GovernmentsGoogle Scholar
  26. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  27. Travis M, Baxandall P (2011) Caution: red light camera ahead the risks of privatizing traffic law enforcement and how to protect the public, technical report. US PIRG Education FundGoogle Scholar
  28. Vanlaar W, Robertson R, Marcoux K (2014) An evaluation of Winnipeg’s photo enforcement safety program: results of time series analyses and an intersection camera experiment’. Accid Analy & Prevention 62:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang X, Abdel-Aty M (2006) Temporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections. Accid Analy Prevent 38(6):1137–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Paris Est and IFSTTARNoisy-le-GrandFrance