Abstract
Access to justice has both procedural and substantive components. Context matters and a society that views its members as part of a collective, for example, may perceive access to justice differently than a more individualistic society. International law documents ensuring access to justice generally take either a general human rights approach or provide specific protections for disadvantaged populations. Although substantive access to justice appears to have improved over time, procedural access to justice may not have kept pace. Money and time are very real limitations. Physical barriers have a severe impact on persons with disabilities and individuals living in poverty. Institutional barriers also limit access to justice for reasons that include ponderous or bias court systems, discriminatory police conduct, expense, and political interference. Additionally, limited education and social custom impair access to justice. When public trust is lacking, individuals may not rely on justice institutions to settle disputes and resolve problems. Challenges remain concerning which substantive rights we need to protect and what efficient and effective procedures are available.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agrast MD (2014) World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2014. Available at http://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/files/wjp_rule_of_law_index_2014_report.pdf
Bloch FS (2008) New directions in clinical legal education: access to justice and the global clinical movement. Wash Univ J Law Policy 28(1):111–139
Carmona MS (2012) Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. U.N. Doc. No. A/HRC/23/36 (11 Mar 2012). Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/117/94/PDF/G1311794.pdf?OpenElement
Francioni F (2007) Access to justice as a human right. Oxford University Press, New York
Hodges C (2001) Multi-party actions: a European approach. Duke J Comp Int Law 11(2):321–354
Krieger LH (2003) Backlash against the ADA. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
McEwen C (2014) Determining whether to initiate a mediation program and how its structure affects results – costs for parties, 1 Mediation: Law, Policy and Practice § 14:5, Cole S, McEwen C, Rogers N, Coben J, Thompson P, Thomson Reuters
Ogletree CJ Jr, Sapir Y (2004) Keeping Gideon’s promise: a comparison of the American and Israeli public defender experiences. N Y Univ Rev Law Soc Change 29(2):203–235
Ortoleva S (2011) Inaccessible justice. ILSA J Int Comp Law 17(2):281–320
Turquet L et al (2015) Progress of the world’s women: in pursuit of justice. U.N. Women. Available at http://progress.unwomen.org/pdfs/EN-Report-Progress.pdf
Watson GD (2001) Class actions: the Canadian experience. Duke J Comp Int Law 11(2):269–288
Further Reading
Friedman LM (2009) Access to justice: some historical comments. Fordham Urban Law J 37(1):3–15
Johnson E (1985) The right to counsel in civil cases: an international perspective. Loyola Law Rev 19(2):341–436
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Larson, D.A. (2019). Access to Justice. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_570
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_570
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences