Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Trademarks and the Economic Dimensions of Trademark Law in Europe and Beyond

  • P. Sean MorrisEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_566

Abstract

The economic analysis of trademark law continues to draw a number of commentaries, yet more and more, the courts are not factoring concrete economic analysis of trademark law and trademark protection in their decisions. In this entry I give an overview and status of trademarks from a law and economic perspective and suggest that trademark laws need to respond to the economic dimension that occurs on the market and consumer economic behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market for mechanisms. Q J Econ 84:488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes DW (2006) A new economics of trademarks. Northwest J Technol Intellect Prop Law 5:22–67Google Scholar
  3. Barnes DW (2007) Trademark externalities. Yale J Law Technol 10:1–44Google Scholar
  4. Brown R Jr (1948) Advertising and the public interest: legal protection of trade symbols. Yale Law J 57:1165–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamberlin E (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition: a re-orientation of the theory of value. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooter C, Ulen T (2012) Law and economics, 6th edn. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Director A (1964) The parity of the economic market place. J Law Econ 7:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Economides N (1988) The economics of trademarks. Trademark Rep 78:523–539Google Scholar
  10. Griffiths A (2011) An economic perspective on trade mark law. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmes O (1987) The path of law. Harv Law Rev 10:457–478Google Scholar
  12. Jordan E, Rubin P (2008) An economic analysis of the law of false advertising. In: Mialon HM, Rubin PH (eds) Economics, law and individual rights. Routledge, London, pp 18–43Google Scholar
  13. Knight F (1933) The economics of organization. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Landes W, Posner R (1987) Trademark law: an economic perspective. J Law Econ 30:265–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lunney G Jr (1999) Trademark monopolies. Emory Law J 48:367–487Google Scholar
  16. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Medema S (2010) Chicago law and economics. In: Ross E (ed) The Elgar companion to the Chicago school of economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 160–174Google Scholar
  18. Miceli T (1997) Economics of the law: torts, contracts, property, litigation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Morris PS (2012) The economics of distinctiveness: the road to monopolization in trademark law. Loyola Int Comp Law Rev 33:321–386Google Scholar
  20. Morris PS (2013) Trademarks as sources of market power. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  21. Mueller C (1968) Sources of monopoly power: a phenomenon called ‘Product Differentiation’. Am Univ Law Rev 18:1–42Google Scholar
  22. Papandreou A (1956) The economic effect of trademarks. Calif Law Rev 44:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Posner R (1973) Economic analysis of law, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramello G (2006) What is a sign? Trademark law and economic theory. J Econ Surv 20:547–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson J (1933) The economics of imperfect information. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Smirti S (1976) Trademarks as tying products: the presumption of economic power. St Johns Law Rev 50:689–724Google Scholar
  27. Stigler G (1961) The economics of information. J Pol Econ 69:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases and Legislations

  1. Blanchard v Hill, 26 Eng Rep 692 [1742]Google Scholar
  2. Case C-252/07, Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd [2008], ECR I – 8823Google Scholar
  3. Case C-383/12 P, Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM [2013], ECR I – 0000Google Scholar
  4. Case C-487/07, L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I – 05185Google Scholar
  5. Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community Trade Mark, OJ L 78/1, 24.3.2009 (CTMR)Google Scholar
  6. Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States Relating to Trade Marks, OJ L 299/25, 8.11.2008 (TMD)Google Scholar
  7. Joined Cases C-236 to C-238/08, Google France v Louis Vuitton Malletier [2010], ECR I – 02417Google Scholar
  8. Lanham (Trademark) Act, 15 U.S.C. s. 1051, 60 Stat 427 [1946]Google Scholar
  9. Plasticolor Molded Products v Ford Motor Co., 713 F. Supp 1329 [1989]Google Scholar
  10. Qualitex Co. v Jacobson Products Co., 514 US S. Ct. 159 [1995]Google Scholar
  11. Trade Marks Act (UK) [1994]Google Scholar
  12. Trademark Act (Sweden) [2010]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland