Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Class Action and Aggregate Litigations

  • Giovanni Battista RamelloEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_553

Synonyms

Definition

Class action and other forms of aggregate litigation introduce in the legal procedure a powerful means for gathering dispersed interests and channeling them into a type of action in which the different parties concur to promote individual and social interest. They can restore the full working of the legal system, and in addition they can be a powerful device for promoting social welfare when other institutional arrangements seem to be ineffective or inefficient.

Introduction

Class action and other forms of aggregate litigation are the answer to an organizational puzzle in civil procedure dealing with reconciling enforcement of the dispersed victims’ rights, the lack of proper incentive for promoting a legal action, and the social interest of producing the public goods of deterrence and, possibly, regulatory change (Ramello 2012). The underlying problem is the twofold partial or total failure of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ALI (2010) Principle of the law of aggregate litigation. American Law Institute, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlen J (2010) Contracting over liability: medical malpractice and the cost of choice. Univ Penn Law Rev 158:957–1023Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus JG, Cassone A, Ramello GB (2012) The law and economics of class actions in Europe. Lessons from America. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner SP (2007) Class actions and group litigation in Switzerland. Northwest J Intl Law Bus 27(2):301–349Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein R (1977) Judicial economy and class action. J Legal Stud 7(2):349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CAFA 2005 is an acronm for Class Action Fairness Actas written in the text the first time. Hence it does not need referenceGoogle Scholar
  7. Calabresi G (1970) The cost of accident. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  8. Calabresi G, Schwartz KS (2011) The costs of class actions: allocation and collective redress in the US experience. Eur J Law Econom 32:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassone A, Ramello GB (2011) The simple economics of class action: private provision of club and public goods. Eur J Law Econ 32:205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dam KW (1975) Class actions: efficiency, compensation, and conflict of interest. J Legal Stud 4:47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards BK, Starr RM (1984) A note on indivisibilities, specialization, and economies of scale. Am Econom Rev 77:192–194Google Scholar
  12. Eisenberg T, Engel C (2014) Assuring civil damages adequately deter: a public good experiment. J Empir Legal Stud 11:301–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberg T, Miller GP (2004) Attorney fees in class action settlements: an empirical study. J Empir Legal Stud 1:27–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenberg T, Miller G (2013) The english vs. the American rule on attorneys fees: an empirical study of attorney fee clauses in publicly-held companies’ contracts’. Cornell Law Rev 98:327–382Google Scholar
  15. Epstein RA (2003) Class action: aggregation, amplification and distorsion. University of Chicago, Legal Forum, pp 475–518Google Scholar
  16. Harnay S, Marciano A (2011) Seeking rents through class actions and legislative lobbying: a comparison. Eur J Law Econ 32:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hensler DR, Dombey-Moore B, Giddens E, Gross J, Moller E, Pace M (eds) (2000) Class action dilemmas. Pursuing public goals for private gain. Rand Publishing, Santa Monica/ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Helland E, Klick J (2007) The trade-off between regulation and litigation: evidence from insurance class actions. J Tort Law 1:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hensler DR (2001) Revisiting the monster: new myths and realities of class action and other large scale litigation. Duke J Comp Int Law 11:179–213Google Scholar
  20. Hensler DR (2011) The future of mass litigation: global class actions and third-party litigation funding. George Wash Law Rev 79:306–323Google Scholar
  21. Hilgard MC, Kraayvanger J (2007) Class action and mass action in Germany. International Bar Association Litigation Committee Newsletter, September, pp 40–41Google Scholar
  22. Issacharoff S, Miller GP (2012) Will aggregate litigation come to Europe? In: Backhaus JG, Cassone A, Ramello GB (eds) The law and economics of class actions in Europe. Lessons from America. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  23. Klement A, Neeman Z (2004) Incentive structures for class action lawyers. J Law Econ Org 20:102–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee EG, Willging TE (2008) The impact of the class action fairness act on the federal courts: an empirical analysis of filings and removals. Univ Penn Law Rev 156:1723–1764Google Scholar
  25. Macey JR, Miller GP (1991) The plaintiffs’ Attorney’s role in class action and derivative litigation: economic analysis and recommendations for reform. Univ Chicago Law Rev 58:1–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pace NM, Carroll SJ, Vogelsang I, Zakaras L (2007) Insurance class actions in the United States. RAND, Sanata MonicaGoogle Scholar
  27. Porrini D, Ramello GB (2011) Class action and financial markets: insights from law and economics. J Fin Econ Policy 3:140–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramello GB (2012) Aggregate litigation and regulatory innovation: another view of judicial efficiency. Int Rev Law Econ 32(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodhe DL (2004) Access to justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacconi L (2011) The case against lawyers’ contingent fees and the misapplication of principal-agent models. Eur J Law Econ 32:263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ulen TS (2011) An introduction to the law and economics of class action litigation. Eur J Law Econ 32:185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yeazell SC (1987) From medieval group litigation to the modern class action. Yale University Press, New HavenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DiGSPESUniversity of Eastern PiedmontAlessandriaItaly
  2. 2.IELTorinoItaly