Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

European Integration

  • Aurelien PortueseEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_54

Abstract

European integration is a process. It is a process of institutionalization by which the old continent is continuously transformed either through incremental changes or through across-the-board reforms. European integration designates the changing current institutional framework of the European Union (hereafter EU). The European continent experiences other institutional integration than the EU’s – mostly the European Convention on Human Rights – but the focus shall be put on the EU as this regional organization is the most significant and integrated one.

The history of the European integration has paved the way for an entire new legal order with a strong economic rationale to come to the fore (I). The emphasis of institution-building and market-building has nevertheless not been without difficulties in terms of construing a common political structure, democratically legitimate for the European national democracies (II).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bernard C (2010) The substantive law of the EU: the four freedoms, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Duchene F (1994) Jean Monnet. The first statesman of interdependence. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Haas EB (2004) Introduction: institutionalisation or constructivism? In: The uniting of Europe: political, social and economic forces 1950–1957, 3rd edn. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp xiii–lviGoogle Scholar
  4. Kant I (1992) Perpetual peace. A philosophical essay. Thoemmes Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  5. Montesquieu B (1758) Oeuvres Complètes: De l’Esprit des Lois (Complete works: spirit of the laws). Gallimard/Pléiade, Paris (1951)Google Scholar
  6. Moravcsik A (1993) Preferences and power in the European community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach. J Common Mark Stud 31:473–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pelkmans J (2006) European integration, methods and economic analysis. Pearson Education/Financial Times, Harlow/Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  8. Portuese A (2011) The principle of subsidiarity as a principle of economic efficiency. Columbia J Eur Law 17:231Google Scholar
  9. Portuese A (2012) The principle of economic efficiency in the ECJ case-law (Le Principe d’Efficience Economique dans la Jurisprudence Européenne). Thèse de l’Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas, Paris. Accessible à: https://docassas.u-paris2.fr/nuxeo/site/esupversions/c51d2b4b-4981-4c62-8531-285d0804dc05
  10. Portuese A (2013) Principle of proportionality as principle of economic efficiency. Eur Law J 19:612–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Portuese A (2014a) The principle of legal certainty as a principle of economic efficiency. Eur J Law Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-014-9435-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Portuese A (2014b) The case for a principled approach to law and economics: efficiency analysis and general principles of EU law. In: Mathis K (ed) Law and economics in Europe, Foundations and applications. Springer Books, Dordrecht, pp 275–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stone Sweet A, Fligstein N (2001) The institutionalisation of Europe. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Toth AG (2008) The Oxford encyclopaedia of European community law, vol II: The law of the internal market (2005); vol III: Competition law and policy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Turk A (2010) Judicial review in the EU. Elgar Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Weiler JHH (1991) The transformation of Europe. Yale Law J 100:2403–2483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiler JHH (2000) Epilogue The Fischer Debate In: Joerges C, Mény Y, Weiler JHH (eds) What kind of constitution for what kind of polity?: responses to Joschka Fischer. Robert Schuman Centre, EUIGoogle Scholar
  18. Weiler JHH (2003) In: Begg I, Peterson J, Weiler JHH (eds) Integration in an expanding European Union: reassessing the fundamentals. Blackwell Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Armstrong KA (2003) Governance and the single European market. In: Craig P (ed) The evolution of EU law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 745–789Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin R, Wyplosz C (2009) Economics of European integration, 3 rev edn. McGraw Hill Higher Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Cecchini P (1988) The European challenge 1992. Wildwood House, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  4. CEPR (1993) Making sense of subsidiarity: how much centralisation for Europe? London (study group Begg et al)Google Scholar
  5. CEPR (2003) Built to last: a political architecture for Europe. LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohn-Bendit D, Verhofstadt G (2012) For Europe! Manifesto for a postnational revolution in Europe. Carl Hanser Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig P, De Burca G (2011) EU Law. Text, cases and materials, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diez T, Wiener A (2004) European integration theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Eeckhout P (2005) External relations of the European Union: legal and constitutional foundations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert M (2012) European integration: a concise history. Rowman & Littlefield, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hix S (2005) The political system of the European Union, 2nd edn. Palgrave, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Holle W (2006) The economics of European integration: theory, practice, policy. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Howells G (2002) Federalism in USA and EC – the scope for harmonised legislative activity compared. ERPL 10:601–622Google Scholar
  14. Olsen JP (2001) Organizing European institutions of governance: a prelude to an institutional account of political integration. In: Wallace H (ed) Interlocking dimensions of European integration. Palgrave, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Pelkmans J (2002) Mutual recognition in goods and services: an economic perspective. College of Europe, Bruges. BEEP briefings no 2, December. www.coleurop.be
  16. Pelkmans J, Labory S, Majone G (2000) Better EU regulatory quality: assessing current initiatives and new proposals. In: Galli G, Pelkmans J (eds) Regulatory reform and competitiveness in Europe, vol 1. E. Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandholtz W, Stone-Sweet A (1998) European integration and supranational governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith A, Venables A (1991) Economic integration and market access. Eur Econ Rev 35:388–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weatherill S (1995) Law and integration in the European Union. Clarendon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Weatherhill S (2005) Harmonisation: how much, how little. EBLR 533Google Scholar
  21. Woods L (2004) Free movement of goods and services within the European community. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WestminsterLondonUK