Abstract
A growing body of work in economics has pointed towards the crucial importance of government quality for economic development. A major issue emerging in related empirical work has been the need to account for the confounding influence of other factors as well as the presence of reverse causality or the likelihood that development itself may facilitate governance. The potentially key role of government quality in explaining international differences in economic development has led many scholars to try and identify those factors that determine it. This research effort has brought forth the role of numerous variables including social heterogeneity, cultural heritage, and constitutional design. The lion’s share of empirical work has employed measures of government quality based on perceptions. A debate exists about the convenience of conflating government quality with institutional quality. To measure institutional quality, it may be more advisable to generate measures or indicators which capture the extent to which institutions actually constrain governments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91:1369–1401
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2002) Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Q J Econ 117:1231–1294
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2005) Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 385–472
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2012) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation: reply. Am Econ Rev 102(6):3077–3110
Albouy D (2012) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation: comment. Am Econ Rev 102(6):3059–3076
Alesina A, Zhuravskaya E (2011) Segregation and the quality of government in a cross-section of countries. Am Econ Rev 101:1872–1911
Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W (1999) Public goods and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ 114(4):1243–1284
Baldwin K, Huber J (2010) Economic versus cultural differences: forms of ethnic diversity and public good provision. Am Polit Sci Rev 104(4):644–662
Enikolopov R, Zhuravskaya E (2007) Decentralization and political institutions. J Public Econ 91:2261–2290
Fisman R, Gatti R (2002) Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. J Public Econ 83:325–345
Fisman R, Miguel E (2007) Corruption, norms and legal enforcement. Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. J Polit Econ 115(6):1020–1048
Glaeser E, Saks R (2006) Corruption in America. J Public Econ 90:1053–1072
Glaeser E, Scheinkman J, Shleifer A (2003) The injustice of inequality. J Monet Econ 50:199–222
Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004) Do institutions cause growth? J Econ Growth 9:271–303
Hall R, Jones C (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1):83–116
Islam R, Montenegro C (2002) What determines the quality of institutions? Background paper for the World Development Report 2002, Building Institutions for Markets, Washington DC
Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastrutzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy research paper no 5430, Washington DC
Kunicová J, Rose-Ackerman S (2005) Electoral rules and constitutional structures as constraints on corruption. Br J Polit Sci 35(4):573–606
Kyriacou A (2013) Ethnic group inequalities and governance: evidence from developing countries. Kyklos 66(1):78–101
La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15(1):222–279
Langbein L, Knack S (2010) The worldwide World Governance Indicators: Six, one, or none? J Dev Stud 46(2):350–370
Licht A, Goldsmith C, Schwartz S (2007) Culture rules: the foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. J Comp Econ 35:659–688
North D (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5:97–112
North D, Thomas R (1973) The rise of the western world. A new economic history. W.W. Norton, New York
North C, Orman W, Gwin C (2013) Religion, corruption, and the rule of law. J Money Credit Bank 45(5):757–779
Persson T, Tabellini G, Trebbi F (2003) Electoral rules and corruption. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):958–989
Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F (2004) Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J Econ Growth 9:131–165
Sokoloff K, Engerman S (2000) History lessons: institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the new world. J Econ Perspect 14:217–232
Sonin K (2003) Why the rich may prefer poor protection of property rights. J Comp Econ 31:715–731
Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Public Econ 76:399–457
Voigt S (2013) How (not) to measure institutions. J Inst Econ 9(1):1–26
You J, Khagram S (2005) A comparative study of inequality and corruption. Am Sociol Rev 70:136–157
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kyriacou, A.P. (2019). Government Quality. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences