Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Market Definition

  • Javier ElizaldeEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_311

Abstract

The goal of this essay is to explain the role attributed to the analysis of market definition in the guidelines which rule in the United States and the European Union and to revise some of the empirical tests proposed by researchers in the fields of competition Economics and Law along with some of the critiques they received regarding their applicability for antitrust purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baker JB, Bresnahan TF (1988) Estimating the residual demand curve facing a single firm. Int J Ind Organ 6(3):283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenkers, R. and F. Verboven (2006): Market definition with differentiated products – lessons from the car market. In: Choi J.P. (ed) Recent developments in antitrust: theory and evidence. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardona M, Schwarz A, Burcin Yurtoglu B, Zulehner C (2009) Demand estimation and market definition for broadband internet services. J Regul Econ 35:70–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlton DW (2010) Revising the horizontal merger guidelines. J Compet Law Econ 6(3):619–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coate MB, Fischer JH (2008) A practical guide to the hypothetical monopolist test for market definition. J Compet Law Econ 4(4):1031–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2010). Horizontal merger guidelines. Available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/merger-review/100819hmg.pdf
  7. Ekelund R, Ford G, Jackson J (1999) Is radio advertising a distinct local market? An empirical analysis. Rev Ind Organ 14(3):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elizalde J (2013) Market definition with differentiated products. A spatial competition application. Eur J Law Econ 36(3):471–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elzinga K, Hogarty T (1972) The demand for beer. Rev Econ Stat 54(2):195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elzinga K, Hogarty T (1973) The problem of geographic market delineation in Antimerger suits. Antitrust Bull 18:45–81Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (2010): Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: an economic alternative to market definition. J Theor Econ, 10(1), Article 9Google Scholar
  12. Forni M (2004) Using stationarity tests in antitrust market definition. Am Law Econ Rev 6(2):441–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris BC, Simons JJ (1989) Focusing market definition: how much substitution is enough. Res Law Econ 12:207–226Google Scholar
  14. Horowitz I (1981) Market definition in antitrust analysis: A regression-based approach. South Econ J 48(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hosken D, Taylor CT (2004) Discussion of ‘using stationarity tests in antitrust market definition’. Am Law Econ Rev 6(2):465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivaldi M, Lörincz S (2011) Implementing relevant market tests in antitrust policy: application to computer servers. Rev Law Econ 7(1):29–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson FI (1989) Market definition under the merger guidelines: critical elasticities. Res Law Econ 12:235–246Google Scholar
  18. Kamerschen DR (1994) Testing for antitrust market definition under the Federal Government guidelines. J Leg Econ 4(1):1–10Google Scholar
  19. Kaplow L (2010) Why (Ever) define markets? Harv Law Rev 124:437–517Google Scholar
  20. Kaplow L (2011) Market definition and the merger guidelines. Rev Ind Organ 39:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, book 5. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Brien DP, Wickelgren AL (2003) A critical analysis of critical loss analysis. Antitrust Law J 71(1):161–184Google Scholar
  23. Scheffman DT, Spiller PT (1987) Geographic market definition under the U.S. Department of Justice merger guidelines. J Law Econ 30:123–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slade ME (1986) Exogeneity tests of market boundaries applied to petroleum products. J Ind Econ 34(3):291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stigler GJ, Sherwin RA (1985) The geographic extent of the market. J Law Econ 28(3):555–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uri ND, Rifkin EJ (1985) Geographic markets, causality and railroad deregulation. Rev Econ Stat 67(3):422–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Uri ND, Howell J, Rifkin EJ (1985) On defining geographic markets. Appl Econ 17(6):959–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Werden GJ (1990) The limited relevance of patient migration data in market delineation for hospital merger cases. J Health Econ 8(4):363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Werden GJ (1998) Demand elasticities in antitrust analysis. Antitrust Law J 66(2):363–414Google Scholar
  30. Werden GJ (2003) The 1982 merger guidelines and the ascent of the hypothetical monopolist test. Antitrust Law J 71(1):253–275Google Scholar
  31. Werden GJ, Froeb LM (1993) Correlation, causality and all that jazz: the inherent shortcomings of price tests for antitrust market delineation. Rev Ind Organ 8(3):329–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of NavarraPamplonaSpain