Communicating Invention, Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

  • Magdalena Bielenia-GrajewskaEmail author
  • Elias G. Carayannis
  • David F. J. Campbell
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200091-1

Synonyms

Introduction

The organizations of the twenty-first century should be creative, inventive, innovative, and entrepreneurial if they want to be successful on the modern market (Carayannis and Chanaron 2007). The mentioned organizational approach is shaped, performed, and sustained by communication. As Bielenia-Grajewska (2017) discusses, it is difficult to imagine individual or organizational performance without any communicative interaction since it determines...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersson AE, Beckmann MJ. Economics of knowledge. Theory, models and measurements. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Barbaroux P, Attour A, Schenk E. Knowledge management and innovation: interaction, collaboration, openness. London: Wiley; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessant J, Tidd J. Innovation and entrepreneurship. Chichester: Wiley; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Linguistics. In: Bainbridge WS, editor. Leadership in science and technology. A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2012. p. 41–8.Google Scholar
  5. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Attention crash. In: Harvey K, editor. Encyclopedia of social media and politics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2014. p. 89–90.Google Scholar
  6. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Knowledge poverty. In: Odekon M, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of world poverty. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2015a. p. 882–4.Google Scholar
  7. Bielenia-Grajewska M. The role of figurative language in knowledge management. In: Khosrow-Pour M, editor. Encyclopedia of information science and technology. 3rd ed. Hershey: IGI Global; 2015b. p. 4728–35.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Rola języka symbolicznego w edukacji ekonomicznej na przykładzie nazw metaforycznych wykorzystujących domenę złota. Edukacja ekonomistów i menadżerów. 2015c;3(37):57–70.Google Scholar
  9. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Intellectual property rights. In: Boslaugh SE, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of pharmacology and society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2016. p. 780–3.Google Scholar
  10. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Communication networks. In: Lowry LL, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of travel and tourism. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2017. p. 287–92.Google Scholar
  11. Bielenia-Grajewska M. Knowledge management from the metaphorical perspective. In: Khosrow-Pour M, editor. Encyclopedia of information science and technology. 4th ed. Hershey: IGI Global; 2018. p. 5085–92.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bielenia-Grajewska M, Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Linguistic dimension of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. In: Carayannis EG, editor. Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 1206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell DFJ. Global quality of democracy as innovation enabler. Measuring democracy for success. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. https://www.palgrave.com/de/book/9783319725284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72529-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. Quality of democracy and innovation, 1527–1534. In: Carayannis EG (Editor-in-Chief), Dubina IN, Seel N, Campbell DFJ, Uzunidis D (Associate Editors), editors. Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer; 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3′ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol. 2009;46(3/4):201–34.Google Scholar
  16. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge production in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. SpringerBriefs in Business. New York: Springer; 2012. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/book/978-1-4614-2061-3.Google Scholar
  17. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple Helix innovation systems. J Innov Entrep. 2014;3(12):1–23. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/3/1/12.Google Scholar
  18. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Smart Quintuple Helix innovation systems: how social ecology and environmental protection are driving innovation, sustainable development and economic growth. SpringerBriefs in Business. New York: Springer; 2019. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783030015169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carayannis EG, Chanaron JJ. Leading and managing creators, inventors, and innovators: the art, science and craft of fostering creativity, triggering invention, and catalyzing innovation. Westport: Praeger; 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ, Efthymiopoulos MP, editors. Handbook of cyber-development, cyber-democracy, and cyber-defense. New York: Springer; 2018. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319090689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Bono E. Atlas of management thinking. Aldershot: Gower Publishing; 1981.Google Scholar
  22. Evans C. Managing for knowledge. HR’s strategic role. Amsterdam: Butterworth –Heinemann; 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Ferreira JJ, Dana L-P, Ratten V. Knowledge spillover-based strategic entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge; 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Grant R. Contemporary strategy analysis and cases: text and cases. Chichester: Wiley; 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Helms R, Cranefield J, van Rejsen J. Social media and knowledge management. A perfect couple. Social knowledge management in action: applications and challenges. Cham: Springer; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hisrich R. Advanced introduction to entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014.Google Scholar
  27. Holsapple CW, Hsiao SH, Oh JY. Parameters of knowledge management success. In: Liebowitz J, editor. Successes and failures of knowledge management. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1–12.Google Scholar
  28. Jashapara A. Knowledge management: an integrated approach. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 2004.Google Scholar
  29. McClosey D. The rhetoric of economics. Brighton: The Harvester Press Publishing Group; 1985.Google Scholar
  30. Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. The knowing-doing gap: how smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  31. Robbins SP. Skuteczne podejmowanie decyzji. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne; 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Swann P. The economics of innovation. An introduction. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar; 2009.Google Scholar
  33. Syrett M, Lammiman J. Creativity. Oxford: Capstone Publishing; 2002.Google Scholar
  34. Thorsby D. Economics and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  35. Van de Ven AH. Central problems in the management of innovation. Manag Sci. 1986;32(5):590–607. Organization DesignCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. West MA. Developing creativity in organizations. Leicester: Wiley-Blackwell; 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magdalena Bielenia-Grajewska
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elias G. Carayannis
    • 2
  • David F. J. Campbell
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Translation Studies, Institute of EnglishUniversity of GdanskGdanskPoland
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems & Technology Management, School of BusinessThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department for Continuing Education Research and Educational Technologies, Center for Educational Management and Higher Education DevelopmentDanube University KremsKremsAustria

Section editors and affiliations

  • David F. J. Campbell
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Unit for Quality Enhancement (UQE)University of Applied Arts ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Faculty for Interdisciplinary Studies (iff), Institute of Science Communication and Higher Education Research (WIHO)Alpen-Adria-University KlagenfurtViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Department for Continuing Education Research and Educational Management, Centre for Educational Management and Higher Education DevelopmentDanube University KremsKremsAustria