Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Living Edition
| Editors: Fred R. Volkmar

Selective Attention

Living reference work entry
First Online:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_1932-3
  • 35 Downloads
How to cite

Definition

Selective attention refers to the ability to pay attention to a limited array of all available sensory information. Selective attention, as a filter to help prioritize information according to its importance, is adaptive. If attention is too selective, however, it is maladaptive. Excessively selective attention has become known as “stimulus overselectivity,” which is prevalent in autism. Its cause or causes are assumed to be brain-organic. Because overselectivity has serious implications for impairment of learning at many levels, including social, emotional, and language learning (all key features of autism), it is suggested that an evidence-based treatment should focus on the normalization of attention patterns as early as possible to take advantage of the young brain’s plasticity. Behavior analysis can provide such evidence-based treatments. Until a true cure for autism is found, behavior analysis remains the treatment of choice.

Historical Background

The term of “stimulus...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. Brooks, P. J., & Ploog, B. O. (2013). Attention to emotional tone of voice in speech perception in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks, P. J., Gaggi, N. L., & Ploog, B. O. (2018). Generalization of content and emotional prosody across speakers varying in gender in youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 83, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Etzel, B. C., LeBlanc, J. M., Schilmoeller, K. J., & Stella, M. E. (1981). Stimulus control procedures in the education of young children. In S. W. Bijou & R. Ruiz (Eds.), Behavior modification: Contributions to education (pp. 3–37). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koegel, R. L., Schreibman, L., Good, A. B., Cerniglia, L., Murphy, C., & Koegel, L. K. (1989). How to teach pivotal behaviors to autistic children: A training manual. Santa Barbara: University of California.Google Scholar
  6. Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., & Rehm, R. (1971). Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulières, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Ploog, B. O. (2010). Stimulus overselectivity four decades later: A review of the literature and its implications for current research in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1332–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ploog, B. O., & Kim, N. (2007). Assessment of stimulus overselectivity with tactile compound stimuli in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1514–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ploog, B. O., & Williams, B. A. (1995). Two methods of stimulus fading applied to a simultaneous flicker rate discrimination in pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 26, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ploog, B. O., Banerjee, S., & Brooks, P. J. (2009). Attention to prosody (intonation) and content in children with autism and in typical children using spoken sentences in a computer game. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ploog, B. O., Brooks, P. J., Scharf, A., & Aum, S. (2014). Perception of the prosody and content of sentences in an unfamiliar language in children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Attention in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(3), 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schreibman, L. (1975). Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sidman, M., & Stoddard, L. T. (1966). Programming perception and learning for retarded children. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 2, pp. 151–208). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Center for Developmental NeuroscienceCollege of Staten Island and Graduate Center, City University of New YorkStaten IslandUSA